{"id":2246,"date":"2021-05-01T13:52:24","date_gmt":"2021-05-01T18:52:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/?p=2246"},"modified":"2021-05-03T15:48:16","modified_gmt":"2021-05-03T20:48:16","slug":"dusting-off-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/2021\/05\/01\/dusting-off-history\/","title":{"rendered":"Dusting off history"},"content":{"rendered":"\n(Da 8:3, 20.) El Imperio medo qued\u00f3 as\u00ed bajo el control de los persas.\n\n\n\nUn nieto de Astiages, Ciro II el Grande, revolucion\u00f3 el mundo pol\u00edtico de Oriente Medio y Pr\u00f3ximo, al sublevarse contra su abuelo y fundar el Imperio persa aquem\u00e9nida.\n\n\n\n\nConvince Me There\u2019s A God \u2013 Archaeology 28\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDI NO A “marchas” QUE USAN SECTORES POLITICOS PARA VANDALIZAR Y DEBILITAR LA ECONOMIA DE UN PAIS\n\n\n\nThe narrative of Bel and the Dragon is incorporated as chapter 14 of the extended Book of Daniel. The original Septuagint text in Greek survives in a single manuscript, Codex Chisianus, while the standard text is due to Theodotion, the 2nd-century AD revisor.\n\n\n\nThe work may date to the Persian period.[2]\n\n\n\n[2] Levine 2010:1552.\n\n\n\nRabbinic Judaism (Hebrew: \u05d9\u05d4\u05d3\u05d5\u05ea \u05e8\u05d1\u05e0\u05d9\u05ea\u200e, romanized: Yahadut Rabanit), also called Rabbinism, Rabbinicism, or Judaism espoused by the Rabbanites, has been the mainstream form of Judaism since the 6th century CE, after the codificat[...x]<\/span>
ion of the Babylonian Talmud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The most important sources for the time of Belshazzar are the Nabonidus Chronicle, the Cyrus Cylinder, and the Verse Account of Nabonidus\u2014which, despite its name, was commissioned by the Persian conqueror Cyrus the Great.[9]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Belshazzar was the son of Nabonidus, the last king of the Neo-Babylonian Empire.[10] The Nabonidus Chronicle describes him as a grandson of Nebuchadnezzar, but this may have been propaganda to justify the reign of his father, who was not of the royal line.[2] He played a pivotal role in the coup d’etat<\/em> that overthrew King Labashi-Marduk and brought Nabonidus to power in 556 BCE, although unlike his co-conspirators he was not a member of the old Babylonian aristocracy.[11] Nabonidus spent the years c. 553\u2013543 BCE in the oasis of Teima in the northern areas of the Arabian Peninsula, leaving Belshazzar to govern Babylon.[9] During his father’s prolonged absence Belshazzar ruled as regent or co-regent, but was never called King and never took part in the Babylonian New Year Festival, at which the king’s presence was essential.[2] His duties as Crown Prince (the title that appears in documents) included overseeing temple estates and leasing out temple land,[2] and he worked at restoring the Babylonian god Marduk, demoted by Nabonidus in favor of the moon god Sin.[12]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nabonidus returned to Babylon about 543 BCE, and the status of Belshazzar thereafter is unclear.[13][14] The king’s return may have been connected with the increasing threat posed by the Persian conqueror Cyrus the Great, who ruled a huge empire to the north and east of Babylon. Open hostilities commenced in late 539 BCE, and on 12 October “Ugbaru, governor of the district of Gutium, and the army of Cyrus entered Babylon without a battle” (Babylonian Chronicle)\u2014this is presumably the same individual as Gobryas, a Babylonian provincial governor who switched to the Persian side, mentioned by the Greek historian Xenophon.[13] Nabonidus was captured and his life apparently spared, but Belshazzar may have died during the fall of the city.[15]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, if \u201cAhasuerus\u201d was just a common \u201ctitle\u201d for Persian kings generally, what would be the point of mentioning it if the intent of Esther 1:1 was to clarify exactly which king was being discussed? It does not help to identify the exact king if \u201cAhasuerus\u201d was simply a generic title. If instead it was a personal name or perhaps a throne name, though, it has real value in narrowing down the options. Thus, I believe it makes better sense to view \u201cAhasuerus\u201d as either a throne name taken by two Medo-Persian kings or as an example of papponymic name repetition. The further observation that the intended king was fabulously wealthy, because he inherited an expansive empire from his father Darius the Great\u2014who is never<\/em> called either Ahasuerus or Artaxerxes anywhere in any historical records\u2014is used to narrow the options down to only one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cyaxares II figures prominently in Xenophon\u2019s Cyropaedia<\/em>. In contrast, he is absent from the Histories<\/em> of Herodotus<\/em>, which leaves no place for Cyaxares II. Herodotus says the Median king Astyages had no son, and that his successor as king of both Media and Persia was Cyrus the Great. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Xenophon’s Cyropaedia<\/em> (1.5.2), Cyaxares II followed king Astyages to the throne of the Median Empire, and he was also the brother of Mandane, Cyrus the Great’s mother (1.2.1, 1.4.7).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This Gobryas is mentioned in the Cyropedia of Xenophon as a general who helped in the conquering of Babylon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The A.K. Grayson translation of the Nabonidus Chronicle based on that of T.G. Pinches, considers both the names Ugbaru<\/em> and Gubaru<\/em> found in the latter to be references to this Gobryas. However the names are distinct in the text and refer to two different individuals, the one called Gubaru<\/em> being the ruler placed over Babylon thus corresponding to Cyaxares of the Cyropedia, not Gobryas. Ugbaru<\/em> remains a candidate for Gobryas being described as the ruler of the region of Gutium dying soon after the conquest of Babylon similarly to Xenophon’s portrayal of Gobryas as an elderly “Assyrian” ruler. According to William H. Shea Ugbaru and Gubaru is the same person, being the ruler placed over Babylon, dying soon after the conquest of Babylon.[2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[2] The Search for Darius the Mede; Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 12\/1 (Spring 2001)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

REVIEW
Claudius Ptolemy\u2014still producing much \u2018secular history smoke\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A number of chronological theories \u2018hang\u2019 their convictions on the \u2018peg\u2019 of secular history and floating traditions, especially the king list of Claudius Ptolemy\u2019s Canon<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A number of chronological theories \u2018hang\u2019 their convictions on the \u2018peg\u2019 of secular history and floating traditions, especially the king list of Claudius Ptolemy\u2019s Canon. This king list has been taken as one piece of evidence for a \u2018gap\u2019 of approximately 80 years between the return from captivity and the commencement of the 483 years of Daniel 9:24\u201325. This Canon is merely a list of supposed<\/s> kings with the number of years of their reigns. There is no indication or allowances for any co-regencies, no explanatory text, and no reference to any contemporary historical records for authority. Notwithstanding all this we find,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Yet despite the fact that he [Ptolemy] is merely a late second century compiler writing nearly a hundred years after Christ Jesus, he is our only authority<\/em>, for no other system bridges the gulf from 747 BC to AD 137 [emphasis added].\u201934<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jones, ref. 2, p. 243.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We are uncertain as to whether there is a mistaken identity of Persian Kings, where one king is the same person as another but with a different title. Amel-Marduk REF? View more on History report<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“PTOLEMY’S CANON” DEBUNKED?
JULIA NEUFFER
Berrien Springs, Michigan<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In his recent book, The Crime of Claudius Ptolemy,~ Robert R. Newton of Johns Hopkins University not only credits Ptolemy with compiling the Canon; he accuses him of fabricating regnal dates, in the absence of records, to suit his own purposes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neuffer, Julia. “”Ptolemy’s Canon” Debunked?.” Andrews University Seminary Studies (AUSS)<\/em> 17.2 (1979): .
Available at:
Andrews University Seminary Studies (AUSS) is a semi-annual, refereed print journal of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Julia Neuffer is the author of The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 La salida de la orden para restaurar y edificar a Jerusal\u00e9n por orden de Artajerjes I (Esdras 7:7)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ezra<\/strong> (\/\u02c8\u025bzr\u0259\/; Hebrew: \u05e2\u05b6\u05d6\u05b0\u05e8\u05b8\u05d0\u200e, ‘Ezr\u0101<\/em>;[1] fl. 480\u2013440 BCE), also called Ezra the Scribe<\/strong> (\u05e2\u05b6\u05d6\u05b0\u05e8\u05b8\u05d0 \u05d4\u05b7\u05e1\u05bc\u05d5\u05b9\u05e4\u05b5\u05e8\u200e, Ezra ha-Sofer<\/em>) and Ezra the Priest<\/strong> in the Book of Ezra, was a Jewish scribe (sofer<\/em>) and priest (kohen<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jeremiah wrote his own book, and the book of Kings, and Lamentations. Hezekiah and his colleagues wrote<\/strong> the following, and a mnemonic<\/strong> to remember which books they wrote is yod<\/strong><\/em>, <\/strong>mem<\/strong><\/em>, <\/strong>shin<\/strong><\/em>, <\/strong>kuf<\/strong><\/em>: Isaiah [<\/strong>Yeshaya<\/strong><\/em>], Proverbs [<\/strong>Mishlei<\/strong><\/em>], Song of Songs [<\/strong>Shir HaShirim<\/strong><\/em>], and Ecclesiastes [<\/strong>Kohelet<\/strong><\/em>]. The members of the Great Assembly wrote<\/strong> the following, and a mnemonic<\/strong> to remember these books is kuf<\/strong><\/em>, <\/strong>nun<\/strong><\/em>, <\/strong>dalet<\/strong><\/em>, <\/strong>gimmel<\/strong><\/em>: Ezekiel [<\/strong>Ye\u1e25ezkel<\/strong><\/em> ], and the Twelve Prophets [<\/strong>Sheneim Asar<\/strong><\/em>], Daniel<\/strong> [Daniel<\/strong><\/em> ], and the Scroll of Esther [<\/strong>Megillat Ester<\/strong><\/em>]. Ezra wrote his own book and the genealogy of<\/strong> the book of Chronicles until his<\/strong> period.
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Baba Bathra<\/em> 15a
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Esther 2:5\u20136 (“Mordecai son of Jair, the son of Shimei, the son of Kish, who had been carried into exile from Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, among those taken captive with Jeconiah king of Judah”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Based on that bible verse and daniel 9:25 Esther xerxes was either xerxes or artaxerxes i. Some say Darius father of xerxes but nothing outside those three<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“(Ctesias’s) unreliability makes Herodotus seem a model of accuracy.”[3] Ctesias’s account of the Assyrian kings does not reconcile with the cuneiform evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[3] Burn A.R. Persia and the Greeks. Duckworth. London. 1984. As quoted by Peter Frederick Barker, FROM THE SCAMANDER TO SYRACUSE. STUDIES IN ANCIENT LOGISTICS, page 9, chapter 1. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

I would say The Crime of Claudius Ptolemy was to keep kings outside and portraying them with an importance they share<\/strong>
Ctesias Persica XIII (24) His son Xerxes became king and Artapanos, the son of Artasyras, became as powerful
as his father was during the reign of Darius and the elder Mardonius was equally influential; the most powerful of the eunuchs was Natakas. Xerxes married Amestris, the daughter of Onaphas, with whom he had a son named Dariaios and two years later another named Hystaspes and later a third named Artaxerxes; they had two daughters named Amytis, after her grandmother, and Rhodogyne. (23) reads his reign was 31 but Herodotus, The Histories 7.4 (A. D. Godley, Ed.) reads his was 36<\/p>\n\n\n\n

—
The Encyclopaedia Britannica, for example,
directs the reader to the article on the Greco-Persian Wars, said to have lasted 100 years.
As for dating, the traditional date for the
accession of Xerxes (485 BC) is based on one source only, namely Ptolemy’s Canon (no connection with the Ptolemy kings!), and this is eventually aligned with General Egyptian dating, which over recent years has been revised again and again. Thus, to the extent that Egyptian dating is unreliable, so is our dating of the Mesopotamian and Persian histories.
This raises a very serious problem. Since the
Achaemenid period is so late in ancient history, any date adjustment of this period throws all the earlier dates out. For this reason, many scholars are not game to attack the traditional dating, lest they incur the wrath of the main body of scholars whose
chronology depends on that dating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Los reyes de la dinast\u00eda caldea fueron:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 Nabopolasar: 626 a. C.-605 a. C.
\u2022 Nabucodonosor II: 605 a. C.-562 a. C.
\u2022 Evilmerodac: 562 a. C.-560 a. C.
\u2022 Neriglisar: 560 a. C.-556 a. C.
\u2022 Labashi-Marduk: 556 a. C.
\u2022 Nabonido: 556 a. C.-539 a. C.
\u2022 Belsasar:(Hijo de Nabonido, asum\u00eda el mando cuando su padre estaba ausente) 539 a. C.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

REVIEW
De acuerdo con Dan 5:2, 30, 31, el \u00faltimo rey de los caldeos<\/strong>. Durante mucho tiempo, Belsasar<\/strong> era desconocido fuera de la Biblia<\/strong> y de los escritos jud\u00edos o cristianos basados en Dan_5 Todas las fuentes seculares que trataban del fin del Imperio Babil\u00f3nico se\u00f1alaban a Nabonido como el \u00faltimo rey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aristotle, Politics<\/strong>
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Review the rowley<\/p>\n\n\n\n



<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Charles V. Taylor<\/strong> (30 November 1918 \u2013 2009) was an Australian linguist and the author of at least 19 books on topics ranging from African linguistics to ecclesiastical history.[1]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[1] inauthor:”Charles V. Taylor” – Google Books<\/em>. Retrieved 8 December 2009.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times of the ‘Great Kings’ of Persia
DR CHARLES V. TAYLOR<\/p>\n\n\n\n

REVIEW SECULAR Ptolemy: on trial for fraud<\/p>\n\n\n\n

REVIEWJohn J. Collins<\/strong> (born 1946) is the Holmes Professor of Old Testament Criticism and Interpretation at Yale Divinity School.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

REVIEW <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Seraiah Assumption: Wrapping Up Some Loose Ends<\/strong>
Author: Rick Lanser MDiv Category: The Daniel 9:24-27 Project Created: 10 June 2019
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How Nazis destroyed books in a quest to destroy European culture <\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\u2019s the point of the pyramids? by Gavin Cox  There is evidence from the Great Pyramids of Egypt that may well be testimony to the events of creation and the Flood.
There is evidence from the Great Pyramids of Egypt that may well be testimony to the events of creation and the Flood. It is literally the point of the pyramid, the so-called \u2018benben\u2019, which points towards this evidence. The benben, or the primeval mound, represented in the minds of the ancient Egyptians the first land that appeared from the primeval ocean, called the \u2018Nun\u2019. It was upon this land that the first eight \u2018gods\u2019 sprang into being; four males and their wives, headed by the chief god, called \u2018Nu\u2019. This all sounds remarkably evocative of Noah\u2019s family stepping onto the land after the Flood.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Egyptologist James Allen explains the ancient Egyptian ideas of creation: \u201cThe benben was a pyramid-shaped mound symbolizing the first land that appeared from Nu at the creation.\u201d3 The Nu (or Nun) was the Egyptian idea of a primeval ocean, or flood. The benben stone was a central feature of the more ancient solar temples, which Egyptologist David Silverman states<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201c \u2026 were constructed, in addition to the pyramids, by six Fifth-Dynasty kings and based on the sun temple of Heliopolis. The focus of each temple was an altar before a benben, a squat obelisk with a pyramid point representing the hill over which the sun rose at the beginning of creation.\u201d4<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Allen, J.P., The ancient Egyptian pyramid texts, <\/em>Society of Biblical Literature, Atlanta, GA, p. 427, 2005.
Silverman, D.P., Ancient Egypt<\/em>, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 188, 1997.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The idea of the primeval mound rising up from the primeval ocean occurs in two versions, one from Heliopolis (which is now a suburb of modern Cairo), and the other from Hermopolis (located 322 km south of Cairo, at the modern city of El Ashmunein).5 These ideas are evocative of the accounts of both creation and the Flood in Genesis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another later creation myth was engraved on the Shabako stone, termed the Memphite theology, which refers to the rising primal mound as a deity in its own right, Ta-tanen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read Jiang Zemin<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00bfPor qu\u00e9 Hitler se consideraba el aut\u00e9ntico socialista y hoy lo tildan de extrema derecha?<\/strong>
Emmanuel Rinc\u00f3n 1 abril, 2020
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read The Nazi book burnings<\/strong> were a campaign conducted by the German Student Union (the Deutsche Studentenschaft<\/em> or DSt<\/em>) to ceremonially burn books in Nazi Germany and Austria in the 1930s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ancient Egyptian creation myths<\/strong> are the ancient Egyptian accounts of the creation of the world. The Pyramid Texts, tomb wall decorations and writings, dating back to the Old Kingdom (2780\u20132250 BC) have given us most of the information regarding early Egyptian creation myths.[1] These myths also form the earliest religious compilations in the world.[2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The sun rises over the circular mound of creation as goddesses pour out the primeval waters around it<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the creation myth of the Heliopolitan form of ancient Egyptian religion, Benben<\/strong> was the mound that arose from the primordial waters Nu upon which the creator deity Atum settled. The Benben stone (also known as a pyramidion) is the top stone of the pyramid. It is also related to the obelisk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

August 31, 2020
The Vatican and the post-pandemic world order<\/strong>
Massimo Faggioli looks at the Holy See’s changing relationship with Europe, the United States and China
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La Croix<\/strong> (La Cruz<\/em>, en espa\u00f1ol) es un peri\u00f3dico cat\u00f3lico franc\u00e9s, propiedad del grupo Bayard Presse<\/em> desde 1880.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pope calls for a new world order<\/strong>
UN’s failure to halt US war on Iraq leads to new initiative
John Hooper in Rome
Thu 1 Jan 2004 20.05 EST

Pope John Paul II launched one of the most important diplomatic initiatives of his long papacy yesterday when he called for a new international order to replace the one that emerged from the second world war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

El Papa reclama un nuevo orden mundial<\/strong>
25.12.2005<\/strong>
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Francisco arremete contra el “dogma de fe neoliberal” y proclama un nuevo orden mundial para el mundo postpandemia<\/strong>
\u2022 El Papa reclama en su nueva enc\u00edclica la memoria hist\u00f3rica frente a las dictaduras, y condena con dureza el terrorismo de Estado
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

REVIEW
How an Orthodox Rabbi Became an Unlikely Ally of the Christian Right<\/strong>
By Michael Schulson | February 14, 2017
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

List of converts to Christianity from Judaism<\/strong>
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Crucificaron a la verdad. Pq aceptar\u00edan la veracidad y autoridad hist\u00f3rica de la biblia? Crucificaron a la vida. Pq usar\u00edan el conocimiento sin sesgos ideologicos? Crucificaron el camino a Dios. Pq dir\u00edan hay Dios?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Siloam inscription<\/strong> or Shiloah inscription<\/strong> (Hebrew: \u05db\u05ea\u05d5\u05d1\u05ea \u05d4\u05e9\u05d9\u05dc\u05d5\u05d7\u200e, or Silwan inscription<\/strong>,) known as KAI 189, is a Hebrew inscription found in the Siloam tunnel which brings water from the Gihon Spring to the Pool of Siloam, located in the City of David in East Jerusalem neighborhood of Shiloah or Silwan. The inscription records the construction of the tunnel, which has been dated to the 8th century BCE on the basis of the writing style.[1]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[1] Lemche 1998, p. 47; quote: “A good case can be made on the basis of the paleography to date the inscription in the Iron Age. The inscription itself, on the other hand, does not tell us this. It is only a secondary source, which in this case may be right but which can also be wrong, because nobody can really say on the basis of this anonymous inscription whether it was Hezekiah or some other Judean king from the eighth or seventh century who constructed the tunnel. As it stands, it is the only clear example of an inscription from either Israel or Judah commemorating a public construction work. As such it is a poor companion to similar inscriptions not least from Egypt and Mesopotamia.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hechos 11:28
Y levant\u00e1ndose uno de ellos, llamado Agabo,(A) daba a entender por el Esp\u00edritu, que vendr\u00eda una gran hambre en toda la tierra habitada; la cual sucedi\u00f3 en tiempo de Claudio.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Josephus, in his annals refers to it:
Her arrival (Queen Helena of Adiabene) was very advantageous to the people of Jerusalem; for a famine oppressed them at that time, and many people died for want of money to procure food. Queen Helena sent some of her servants to Alexandria with money to buy a great quantity of grain, and others of them to Cyprus to bring back a cargo of dried figs. They quickly returned with the provisions, which she immediately distributed to those that need. She has thus left a most excellent memorial by the beneficence which she bestowed upon our nation. And when her son Izates was informed of this famine, he sent great sums of money to the principal men in Jerusalem.
Antiquities 20.2.5 49-53
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Helena<\/strong> de Adiabene<\/strong> fue reina de Adiabene<\/strong> y esposa de Monobaz I. Con \u00e9l tuvo a Izates II y Monobaz II. Muri\u00f3 alrededor del 56 d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Historical sources from the time indicate \u201cIn the days (time\/reign) of Claudius” there was famine in Rome, Greece and West Asia<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The absence of a mention of the famine in specific areas of the known world at that time in writing does not mean it didn’t happen. The vast, vast experience of humans over the eons has gone unrecorded. That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n<\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Martin “Moishe” Rosen,<\/strong> in Hebrew: \u05de\u05d5\u05d9\u05e9\u05d4 \u05e8\u05d5\u05d6\u05df<\/strong> (April 12, 1932 \u2013 May 19, 2010)[1] was an American minister and the founder and former Executive Director of Jews for Jesus, a Christian missionary organization that focuses on evangelism to Jewish people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rosen was born in Kansas City, Missouri,[2] the son of Ben Rosen and Rose Baker. He was raised in Denver, Colorado. According to Rosen, his mother’s parents were “Reform Jews from Austria” and his paternal grandfather was an Orthodox Jew. Although his father regularly attended an Orthodox synagogue,[3] Rosen describes him as irreligious and viewing religion as a “racket”.[4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n<\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Pol\u00e9mica en la TV de EEUU: un empleado de CNN revel\u00f3 en una cita falsa de Tinder la estrategia para el rating<\/strong>
La cadena Fox public\u00f3 los dichos de un t\u00e9cnico del canal de noticias rival, que relata c\u00f3mo destacaban permanentemente la cifra de muertes diarias por COVID-19 por pedido del director<\/strong>
15 de Abril de 2021
Un empleado de la cadena CNN cre\u00eda estar en una cita rom\u00e1ntica y, sin saber que estaba siendo filmado, revel\u00f3 pol\u00e9micos detalles sobre la cobertura del canal estadounidense con referencia a la pandemia de coronavirus.<\/strong>
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CNN staffer boasts to Project Veritas that network peddled anti-Trump \u2018propaganda\u2019<\/strong>
By Mark Moore
April 13, 2021 | 5:53pm
Charlie Chester, a technical Director at CNN, claims “if it wasn’t for CNN, I don’t know that Trump would have got voted out,” during a series of fake Tinder dates filmed by Project Veritas.

\u201cLook what we did, we [CNN] got Trump out. I am 100\u200b percent going to say it, and I 100\u200b percent believe that if it wasn\u2019t for CNN, I don\u2019t know that Trump would have got voted out,\u201d Chester said, adding that he came to work at CNN because he \u200b\u200b\u201dwanted to be a part of that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOur focus was to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that\u2019s what it was.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La organizaci\u00f3n Project Veritas defiende con fervor al ex presidente republicano y su ret\u00f3rica contra los grandes medios. En 2017, <\/strong>intentaron enga\u00f1ar a una periodista del <\/strong>Washington Post<\/em><\/strong> con supuestas informaciones perjudiciales sobre un republicano,<\/strong> pero la reportera contactada no cay\u00f3 en la trampa.

Los videos de Project Veritas han provocado algunos despidos y acciones penales, aunque su l\u00edder, james O\u2019Keefe, tambi\u00e9n se ha involucrado en problemas con la justicia. En 2010 se declar\u00f3 culpable de entrar en la oficina de la entonces senadora Mary Landrieu, dem\u00f3crata de Los \u00c1ngeles, bajo falsos pretextos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

James O’Keefe on Twitter: “UPDATE: Charlie Chester’s @LinkedIn account …
13 abr. 2021 \u2014 UPDATE: Charlie Chester’s @ LinkedIn account has been DELETED The @CNN Technical Director was featured in the #ExposeCNN<\/p>\n\n\n\n

‘Our focus was to get Trump out of office’: CNN technical director makes candid admission to undercover Project Veritas reporter after listing his employer on TINDER<\/strong>
By Keith Griffith For Dailymail.com 22:49 13 Apr 2021, updated 06:53 14 Apr 2021
\u2022 CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester was caught on hidden camera video<\/strong>
\u2022 Project Veritas released the clips on Tuesday showing Chester on several ‘dates’<\/strong>
\u2022 Conservative group found Chester through Tinder, where he listed his employer<\/strong>
\u2022 Video shows Chester boasting of ‘propaganda’ tactics used by the network<\/strong>
\u2022 ‘We would always show shots of him jogging’ Chester said of Biden<\/strong>
\u2022 Chester has no editorial input at CNN, but would witness daily decisions there <\/strong>

As a technical director, Chester operates video editing equipment for the cable network, where he has worked since 2018, according to his now-deleted LinkedIn bio.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is unlikely that he would have had editorial input at CNN, or participated in the network’s daily editorial calls. But Project Veritas argues that he has unique insights on the editorial culture at CNN, in which he would be immersed daily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Though the video clips of Chester only provide snippets of his remarks, they do provide enough context to make it clear that the general thrust of his comments hasn’t been concocted through editing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

WATCH: CNN Staffer Goes on Five Tinder Dates With Project Veritas Spy Recording the Whole Thing<\/strong>
By Rudy Takala Apr 13th, 2021, 12:00 pm
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

MEDIA Published<\/strong> April 13, 2021 Last Update<\/strong> April 14
CNN staffer admits network’s focus was to ‘get Trump out of office,’ calls its coverage ‘propaganda’<\/strong>
‘I 100% believe it that if it wasn’t for CNN, I don’t know that Trump would have got voted out’<\/strong>
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn , Brian Flood | Fox News

According to Chester’s LinkedIn page, Chester has been working with the network since 2018 and has worked on several programs, including “New Day,” “Cuomo Prime Time,” and “CNN Tonight.” 
<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(Da 8:3, 20.) El Imperio medo qued\u00f3 as\u00ed bajo el control de los persas. Un nieto de Astiages, Ciro II el Grande, revolucion\u00f3 el mundo pol\u00edtico de Oriente Medio y Pr\u00f3ximo, al sublevarse contra su abuelo y fundar el Imperio persa aquem\u00e9nida. DI NO A “marchas” QUE USAN SECTORES POLITICOS PARA VANDALIZAR Y DEBILITAR LA ECONOMIA DE UN PAIS The narrative … Leer m\u00e1s<\/a><\/p>\n\n

\n Sharing is caring<\/span><\/strong> \n <\/i> Share<\/span><\/a>\n <\/i> +1<\/span><\/a>\n <\/i> Tweet<\/span><\/a>\n <\/i> Share<\/span><\/a>\n <\/i> Share<\/span><\/a>\n 4342 words 151 views<\/w>\n <\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2246","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sin-categoria"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2246"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2246\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2268,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2246\/revisions\/2268"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}