{"id":5,"date":"2020-12-05T13:55:54","date_gmt":"2020-12-05T18:55:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/?p=5"},"modified":"2022-01-15T18:17:48","modified_gmt":"2022-01-15T23:17:48","slug":"budismo-y-ocultismo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/2020\/12\/05\/budismo-y-ocultismo\/","title":{"rendered":"Budismo y ocultismo"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

ADVICES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

ENAMORADOS DE EL ETERNO, RENDIDOS ANTE EL, ANTE LA MAGNIFICENCIA DE SU PRESENCIA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NO HAY OTRO COMO EL!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NO ALEJES DE MI TU SANTO ESPIRITU! VACIO Y DESERTICO SIN TI!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DANZAD ANTE SU PRESENCIA! DELICIAS A SU DIESTRA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DEJARLO TODO EN ESTE MUNDO PARA SER DIGNO DE TI!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NO TODO POR LO QUE SIENTAS ATRACCION PROVIENE DE DIOS! DEPENDE TU SABIDURIA DE TU TEMOR A DIOS!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LEE ENTRE LINEAS!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AUN SATANAS SE VISTE COMO ANGEL DE LUZ!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

POR SOBRE TODAS LAS COSAS GUARDA TU CORAZON!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LLAMADOS CRISTIANOS PREDICAN MENTIRA POR EL CONOCIMEINTO ADQUIRIDO SECULARMENTE, MAL CORAZON (LOBOS VESTIDOS DE OVEJAS) Y UNA VIDA EN PECADO PERMITIENDO QUE SU CARNE HABLE, SIENDO INFLUENCIADOS POR ELLA Y ALGUNAS VECES POR ANGELES CAIDOS!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EN ALGUNOS CASOS LA VERDAD NO ES VALORADA A CAUSA DE LA IGNORACIA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LA VERDAD ES DISTORCIONADA APROVECHANDOSE DE LA IGNORACIA DEL ESCUCHA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LO QUE NO CONOCES, TE AFECTA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EN NINGUN OTRO HAY SALVACION!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DESECHAR LO QUE NO PROVIENE DE DIOS PARA ALCANZAR SU MISERICORDIA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ISLAM BASADO EN RELIGION Y LAS SAGRADAS ESCRITURAS!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LA SALVACION NO ES SE GANA POR OBRAS, DE MANERA QUE NINGUNO SE GLORIE!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NUESTRA VICTORIA ESTE EN TI!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LA VERDAD NO SE LIGA CON MAS, LA VERDAD ES UNICA Y SUFICIENTE!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DESECHAD LO MALO, RETENED LO BUENO, UTILIZALO PARA QUE CREZCAS EN EL!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LAS NOTICIAS SECULARES SON UNA PORQUERIA DESDE SU FORMACION!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LAS NOTICIAS SECULARES NO SOLO CIEGAN A LAS MASAS SINO QUE PRETENDEN CEGAR A LOS QUE ESTAN EN GOBIERNO INTENTANDO HACER BIEN!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NO ES MI VOLUNTAD, ES LA VOLUNTAD DE EL ETERNO!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LOS REALIDAD NO SE MIRA ATRAVES DE LA RELIGION SINO ATRAVES DE LA VERDAD!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AMAR A MI ESPOSA COMO CRISTO AMA A SU IGLESIA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CELEBRAR POR CONOCIMIENTO ES NECEDAD, CELEBRAR POR SU GRAN MISERICORDIA PARA LOS QUE EN EL PERMANECEN ES SALVACION!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EL ANTICRISTO ES ADORADO POR LOS HINDUS, EXALTADO POR MUSULMANES Y CORONADO POR LOS QUE SE LLAMAN JUDIOS!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PARA ALGUNOS ESTUDIOSOS SECULARES, EL GRIEGO MICENICO Y LA LENGUA HITITA FUERON ANTES DE EL SANSCRITO!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DE QUIEN ES LA GLORIA?! DE QUIEN PROVIENE TODA MISERICORDIA!!! DE QUIEN NOS AMA AUN NOSOTROS SIN MERECERLE!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

QUE MI ACCIONES ADOREN A LA VIDA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DALE OTRO SIGNIFICADO A LAS COSAS ES EL PLAN DE LOS PAYASOS DE SATANAS!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LO QUE VIVIMOS ES EL RESULTADO DEL ENGA\u00d1O Y DE LA GRAN RAMERA NACIDA EN ROMA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

HABIA UNA COSTUMBRE EN LOS PRIMEROS SIGLOS DESPUES DE CRISTO DE REMOVER ALGUNOS POCOS VERSICULOS!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SATANAS, EL PADRE DE MENTIRA, EL HACEDOR DE MALDAD, OCULTA SU MALDAD, CON PRETESTOS, CON MENTIRAS, PRETENDIENDO HACERLA LUCIR BUENA Y UTIL!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LA INTERPRETACION DE LAS ESCRITURAS EN GENERAL DE CUALQUIERA DE LOS PUEBLOS EN LA TIERRA ESTA BASADA EN COMO ESTA NUESTRO CORAZON!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ABRE TUS OJOS Y SE CUIDADOSO CON LAS MENTIRAS PORQUE ELLAS SE BASAN EN LA REALIDAD Y CUANTO MAS BASADA ESTE EN ELLA MAS FACIL SERA PARA LOS INCONSTANTES Y FALTOS DE SABIDURIA CAER!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

TODA CRITICA DE SATANAS Y DE SUS PROFETAS ES PARA HACERTE RETROCEDER Y HACER QUE LO SIRVAS!
SOY CRISTIANO PORQUE SOY SEGUIDOR DE CRISTO JESUS! JUDIO PORQUE RECONOZCO QUE TODO LO QUE TENGO, TODAS LAS BENDICIONES RECIBIDAS Y ESTA VIDA PROVIENEN DE EL AMOR Y MISERICORDIA DE DIOS HACIA MI! Y SOY CATOLICO PORQUE HAGO PARTE DE TODO EL CUERPO DE CRISTO!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CADA UNO DE LOS CONCILIOS Y  DE GUERRAS UTILIZO LA VERDAD (EL EVANGELIO Y SUS PREDICADORES) PARA ESCONDER EL SATANISMO QUE AMAN! PINTANDO SU PAGANISMO DE CRISTIANISMO PARA LA AMPLIA ACEPTACION DE LAS MASAS (FELIGRESES), UTILIZANDO PARA ELLOS LA IGLESIA CATOLICA COMO NIDO DE SU PROPOSITO!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LAS PERSONAS NO RECIBEN EL UNICO EVANGELIO POR VARIAS RAZONES ENTRE LAS CUALES ESTAN LAS SIGUIENTES: AMOR AL PECADO, A\u00d1OS DE HABER ESCUCHADO UN EVANGELIO CORRUPTO EN LA BOCA DE FALSOS PROFETAS, PENSAMIENTO ENTENEBRECIDO A CAUSA DE MENTIRAS QUE A\u00d1O TRAS A\u00d1OS HAN LABADO LA MENTALIDAD DE MUCHOS INCLUYENDOLOS!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SI DECIDES MENTIR O NO QUITARLE EL CIGARRILLO (DROGA) A TUS HIJOS A TEMPRANA EDAD O EN EL MOMENTO OPORTUNO, LES ESTARAS HACIENDO DA\u00d1O. Y SI HACES SU VOLUNTAD POR NO HACERLOS LLORAR, ESTARAS ENTONCES HACIENDOLES UN DA\u00d1O PEOR!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DEBEMOS DE SER ENEMIGOS DE LA MALDAD! Y SER CRUDOS CUANDO LA REALIDAD ES CRUDA, DE MANERA QUE DIGAMOS LA VERDAD A LAS PERSONAS AUNQUE LES DUELA, PUES EL DOLOR HACE CAMBIAR EL CORAZON PARA BIEN, CUANDO TE DAS CUENTA DE LA REALIDAD!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LOS NUEVOS BUDISTAS, ZOROASTRISTAS, HINDUISTAS Y EN GENERAL TODOS LOS PRACTICANTES Y AMANTES DE LA NUEVA ERA, MAL REPRESENTAN SUS DOGAMAS, LA DISFRAZAN CON ASPECTOS DEL NACIMIENTO, PREDICACION, MUERTE Y RESURRECION DE CRISTO (DADO QUE SUS DOGMAS CARECEN DE LOGICA Y SENTIDO COMUN) PARA LOGRAR PERSUADIR A LAS PERSONAS ACERCA DEL ESPERADO MAJDI, KALKI, BUDDHA (ATRAPANDO A LAS PERSONAS). TORCIENDO LA REALIDAD A CONVENIENCIA DE LOS ANGELES CAIDOS, APOYANDOLA EN SUS DELEITES!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A TRAVES DE LA NUEVA ERA, SE LE QUIERE HACER PENSAR A EL HOMBRE DE QUE PUEDE SER DIOS Y QUE VA INNEVITABLEMENTE HACIA ESE CAMINO!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LA REALIDAD SE OCULTA, TORCIENDOLA, DANDOLE PODER A LOS HOMBRES Y A LOS ANGELES CAIDOS PARA NEGAR\/SACAR A DIOS (OTORGANDOSE PODER ELLOS MISMOS), HACIENDOSE PASAR COMO AUTORES DE LA VERDAD, DUE\u00d1OS DE LA MISMA, DISFRAZANDO LA MENTIRA CON VERDAD!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CAPAS DE MENTIRA SOBRE CAPAS DE MENTIRA! CADA UNA SOBRE UN SUCESO Y MOMENTO EN LA HISTORIA! CUANTAS CAPAS SE ENCUENTRA SOBRE LA VERDAD? DEPENDE DE TU SITUACION!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EL HOMBRE POR NATURALEZA SE AGRUPA, BUSCA A QUIENES PIENSAN DE IGUAL MANERA! ES DECISION DE CADA UNO, NO?!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UN DESORDEN MUY ORGANIZADO!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

RESPETARSE NO ES EXIGIR RESPETO SINO VALORARSE! VALORARSE NO ES GENERAR ORGULLO SINO PERMANECER EN DIOS HACIENDO SU VOLUNTAD! <\/p>\n\n\n\n

SCIENCE WITHOUT DEBATE IS PROPAGANDA!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

HIDING EVIDENCE AND MISSREPRESENTING REALITY ARE TWO WAYS TO MISSLEAD PEOPLE!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DIOS NO CAMBIA! A MAYOR DISTANCIA DE DIOS, DE SU INMUTABILIDAD, MAS SUFRIMOS, MAS CONFUNDIDOS, MAS INCONSTANTES LLEGAMOS A ESTAR!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

QUOTES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(This info needs to be checked and analyzed)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Didache<\/em> is mentioned by Eusebius<\/a> (c.<\/em> 324) as the Teachings of the Apostles<\/em> following the books recognized ascanonical<\/a>:[11]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Let there be placed among the spurious works the Acts of Paul<\/em><\/a>, the so-called Shepherd<\/em><\/a> and the Apocalypse of Peter<\/em><\/a>, and besides these the Epistle of Barnabas<\/em><\/a>, and what are called the Teachings of the Apostles<\/em>, and also the Apocalypse of John<\/em><\/a>, if this be thought proper; for as I wrote before, some reject it, and others place it in the canon.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

JEWISH GOSPELS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

1) The Gospel of the Ebionites<\/a> (“GE”) \u2013 7 quotations by Epiphanius.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2) The Gospel of the Hebrews<\/a> (“GH”) \u2013 1 quotation ascribed to Cyril of Jerusalem, plus GH 2\u20137 quotations by Clement, Origen, and Jerome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3) The Gospel of the Nazarenes<\/a> (“GN”) \u2013 GN 1 to GN 23 are mainly from Jerome; GN 24 to GN 36 are from medieval sources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebionites<\/strong>, or Ebionaioi<\/em> (Greek<\/a>: \u1f18\u03b2\u03b9\u03c9\u03bd\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03b9; derived from Hebrew<\/a> \u05d0\u05d1\u05d9\u05d5\u05e0\u05d9\u05dd<\/strong> ebyonim,<\/em> ebionim<\/em>, meaning “the poor” or “poor ones”), is a patristic<\/a> term referring to aJewish Christian<\/a> movement that existed during the middle<\/a> of the second century.[1]<\/sup><\/a> They regarded Jesus of Nazareth<\/a> as the Messiah<\/a> while rejecting his divinity[2]<\/sup><\/a> and insisted on the necessity of following Jewish law and rites<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marcion of Sinope<\/strong> (Greek: \u039c\u03b1\u03c1\u03ba\u03af\u03c9\u03bd[1]<\/sup><\/a> \u03a3\u03b9\u03bd\u03ce\u03c0\u03b7\u03c2), (c. 85 \u2013 c. 160)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Religare<\/strong>
<\/strong>To fasten, tie behind is the English equivalent of the infinitive ‘religare’. <\/strong>The verb also may be translated loosely as ‘to connect with’. One Latin language derivative word is the noun ‘religatio’, which means ‘a tying up’.     Another Latin language derivative is the noun ‘religio’, which the ancient Romans defined as a quality of mortals or of the gods. In terms of mortals, the feminine gender noun refers to ‘conscientious exactness, scrupulousness’ in respecting or observing religious ceremonials and moral scruples. In terms of the gods, it refers to ‘sanctity’ or more loosely to ‘an object, place or thing of worship, of holiness’.  To fasten, tie behind is the English equivalent of ‘religare’. The Latin infinitive is part of a regular verb conjugation whose endings therefore can be predicted accurately for all of the tenses and moods. It differs in meaning from the somewhat similar looking ‘relegare’, which means ‘to send away’ and from which the English language verb ‘relegate’ derives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The word “religion” comes from the Latin word “religio” which has a meaning influenced by the verb “religare” to bind, in the sense of “place an obligation on” (World Book Dictionary). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The World Book Dictionary defines “obligation” as “duty” which, in turn, is defined as “a thing which a person ought to do; a thing which is right to do.” <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some quotes of Robertson linking the study of the Greek New Testament to preaching:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The greatest proof that the Bible is inspired is that it has withstood so much bad preaching!”<\/em>
“God pity the poor preacher who has to hunt for something to preach \u2014 and the people who have to listen!”<\/em>
\u201cPreaching… is the most dangerous thing in the world.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Peter Gumpel repite lo dicho por la colaboradora de P\u00edo XII, Sor<\/a> Pascalina Lehnert acerca de lo que ella escuch\u00f3 decir al cardenal Pacelli sobre Hitler:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Este hombre est\u00e1 completamente exaltado; todo lo que dice y escribe lleva la marca de su egocentrismo; este hombre es capaz de pisotear cad\u00e1veres y eliminar todo lo que le sea un obst\u00e1culo. No lleg\u00f3 a comprender c\u00f3mo hay tantas personas en Alemania que no lo entienden y no saben sacar conclusiones de lo que dice o escribe. \u00bfQui\u00e9n de \u00e9stos al menos se ha le\u00eddo su espeluznanteMein Kampf<\/em><\/a>?.51<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Einstein dijo:48<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Siendo un amante de la libertad, cuando lleg\u00f3 la revoluci\u00f3n a Alemania mir\u00e9 con confianza a las universidades sabiendo que siempre se hab\u00edan vanagloriado de su devoci\u00f3n por la causa de la verdad. Pero las universidades fueron acalladas. Entonces mir\u00e9 a los grandes editores de peri\u00f3dicos que en ardientes editoriales proclamaban su amor por la libertad. Pero tambi\u00e9n ellos, como las universidades, fueron reducidos al silencio, ahogados a la vuelta de pocas semanas. S\u00f3lo la Iglesia permaneci\u00f3 de pie y firme para hacer frente a las campa\u00f1as de Hitler para suprimir la verdad. Antes no hab\u00eda sentido ning\u00fan inter\u00e9s personal en la Iglesia, pero ahora siento por ella un gran afecto y admiraci\u00f3n, porque s\u00f3lo la Iglesia ha tenido la valent\u00eda y la obstinaci\u00f3n de sostener la verdad intelectual y la libertad moral. Debo confesar que lo que antes despreciaba ahora lo alabo incondicionalmente.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Time Magazine, 23 de diciembre de 1940<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anti-Semitism<\/a> was also an integral part of the Rexist programme.[4]<\/sup><\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

TO STUDY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Johann Jakob Herzog<\/strong> (12 September 1805, Basel<\/a> \u2013 30 September 1882, Erlangen<\/a>), German<\/a> Protestant<\/a> theologian<\/a>, was born at Basel<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Valentinus_(Gnostic)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dositheos_(Samaritan) Gnostic?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Saint Augustine: Treatises on Marriage and other Subjects <\/strong>By Charles T. Wilcox, St. Augustine, Roy J. Deferrari <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

PA (pericope adulterae)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jerome<\/a> reports that the pericope adulterae<\/em> was to be found in its usual place in “many Greek and Latin manuscripts” in Rome and the Latin West in the late 4th Century. This is confirmed by some Latin Fathers of the 4th and 5th Centuries CE; including Ambrose<\/a>, and Augustine<\/a>. The latter claimed that the passage may have been improperly excluded from some manuscripts in order to avoid the impression that Christ had sanctioned adultery:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Certain persons of little faith, or rather enemies of the true faith, fearing, I suppose, lest their wives should be given impunity in sinning, removed from their manuscripts the Lord’s act of forgiveness toward the adulteress, as if he who had said, Sin no more, had granted permission to sin.”[14]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The pericope<\/a> is not found in any place in any of the earliest surviving Greek Gospel manuscripts; neither in the two 3rd century papyrus<\/a> witnesses to John – P66<\/sup><\/a> and P75<\/sup><\/a>; nor in the 4th century Codex Sinaiticus<\/a> and Vaticanus<\/a>, although all four of these manuscripts may acknowledge the existence of the passage via diacritical marks at the spot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

in 1941 a large collection of the writings of Didymus the Blind<\/a> (ca. 313- 398) was discovered in Egypt, including a reference to the pericope adulterae<\/em> as being found in “several copies”; and it is now considered established that this passage was present in its usual place in some Greek manuscripts known in Alexandria and elsewhere from the 4th Century onwards. In support of this it is noted that the 4th century Codex Vaticanus<\/a>, which was written in Egypt, marks the end of John chapter 7 with an “umlaut”, indicating that an alternative reading was known at this point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2 corinthians 5: 16 \u2192 \u1f00\u03c0\u1f78 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03bd\u1fe6\u03bd<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gospel according to the hebrews <\/strong>This info needs to be checked)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The theology of the Gospel is strongly influenced by Jewish\u2013Christian Wisdom teaching. The Holy Spirit is represented as a manifestation of Divine Wisdom<\/a> who is called “Mother”.[n 12]<\/sup><\/a> The feminine aspect of the Spirit<\/a> is an indication of Semitic influence on the language of the gospel. The Spirit takes Jesus to Mount Tabor<\/a> by a single hair, echoing Old Testament<\/a> themes in the stories of Ezekiel<\/a> (Ezk. 8.3) andHabbakuk<\/a> (Dan. 14.36 LXX<\/a>).[n 13]<\/sup><\/a> The Gospel emphasizes the fulfillment of the prophecy of Isaiah<\/a> 11.2 in Jesus’ baptism, but also adopts elements of Jewish Wisdom theology.[n 14]<\/sup><\/a> The Spirit has been gathered in one place at the moment of Jesus’ baptism, so that he has become the only Son of the Spirit in which he has found eternal “rest” and reigns forever.[23]<\/sup><\/a> The “seek\u2013find” and “rule\u2013rest” language also comes from Jewish Wisdom tradition as stages on the way to salvation during which the believer is encouraged to emulate divine Wisdom.[n 15]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Early Church Fathers <\/strong>(This info needs to be checked)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Clement of Rome<\/strong> <\/strong>His epistle, 1 Clement<\/a> (c.96),[5]<\/sup><\/a> was copied and widely read in the Early Church<\/a>.[6]<\/sup><\/a> Clement calls on the Christians of Corinth<\/a> to maintain harmony and order.[5]<\/sup><\/a> It is the earliest Christian epistle<\/a> outside theNew Testament<\/a>.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Ignatius of Antioch<\/strong> (Ancient Greek<\/a>: \u1f38\u03b3\u03bd\u03ac\u03c4\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2 \u1f08\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9\u03bf\u03c7\u03b5\u03af\u03b1\u03c2, also known as Theophorus<\/strong> from Greek<\/a> \u0398\u03b5\u03bf\u03c6\u03cc\u03c1\u03bf\u03c2 “God-bearer”) ((c. 35 or 50) – (from 98 to 117))[1]<\/sup><\/a>was among the Apostolic Fathers<\/a>, was the third Bishop of Antioch<\/a>, and was a student of John the Apostle<\/a>.[2]<\/sup><\/a>[3]<\/sup><\/a> En route to Rome, where according to Christian tradition he met his martyrdom<\/a> by being fed to wild beasts<\/a>, he wrote a series of letters which have been preserved as an example of very early Christian theology<\/a>. Important topics addressed in these letters include ecclesiology<\/a>, the sacraments<\/a>, Biblical Sabbath<\/a> and the role of bishops<\/a>. He is the second after Clement to mention Paul’s epistles.[5]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Polycarp of Smyrna<\/strong> (c.69\u2013c.155) was a Christian bishop of Smyrna<\/a> (now \u0130zmir<\/a> in Turkey). It is recorded that he had been a disciple of John. Polycarp<\/strong> (Greek<\/a>: \u03a0\u03bf\u03bb\u03cd\u03ba\u03b1\u03c1\u03c0\u03bf\u03c2 Pol\u00fdkarpos<\/em>; AD 69\u2013155) was a 2nd-century Christian<\/a> bishop of Smyrna<\/a>.[1]<\/sup><\/a> According to the Martyrdom of Polycarp<\/em><\/a> he died amartyr<\/a>, bound and burned at the stake, then stabbed when the fire failed to touch him.[2]<\/sup><\/a> Polycarp is regarded as a saint<\/a> in the Roman Catholic<\/a>, Eastern Orthodox<\/a>, Oriental Orthodox<\/a>, Anglican<\/a>, and Lutheran<\/a> churches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is recorded by Irenaeus<\/a>, who heard him speak in his youth, and by Tertullian<\/a>,[3]<\/sup><\/a> that he had been a disciple of John the Apostle<\/a>.[4]<\/sup><\/a>[5]<\/sup><\/a> Saint Jerome<\/a> wrote that Polycarp was a disciple of John and that John had ordained him bishop of Smyrna.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With Clement of Rome<\/a> and Ignatius of Antioch<\/a>, Polycarp is regarded as one of three chief Apostolic Fathers<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cyril of Jerusalem<\/strong> (Greek<\/a> \u039a\u03cd\u03c1\u03b9\u03bb\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2 \u0391\u0384 \u1f39\u03b5\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03bf\u03bb\u03cd\u03bc\u03c9\u03bd) was a distinguished theologian<\/a> of the early Church (ca. 313[1]<\/sup><\/a> \u2013 386 [Jerusalem<\/a>, Syria Palaestina<\/a>]) <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

St. Cyril was ordained a deacon<\/a> by Bishop St. Macarius of Jerusalem<\/a> in about 335 and a priest<\/a> some eight years later by Bishop St. Maximus<\/a>. About the end of 350 he succeeded St. Maximus in the See<\/a> of Jerusalem <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Epiphanius of Salamis<\/strong> (between 310\u2013320 \u2013 403) was bishop of Salamis, Cyprus<\/a> at the end of the 4th century<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eusebius<\/strong> (\/<\/a>ju\u02d0\u02c8si\u02d0bi\u0259s<\/a>\/<\/a>; c.AD 260\/265 \u2013 339\/340) (also called Eusebius of Caesarea<\/strong> and Eusebius Pamphili<\/strong>) was a Roman historian, exegete and Christian.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He became the Bishop<\/a> of Caesarea<\/a> in Palestine<\/a> about the year 314CE. Together with Pamphilus<\/a>, he was a scholar of the Biblical canon<\/a> and is regarded as an extremely well learned Christian of his time.[1]<\/sup><\/a> He wrote Demonstrations of the Gospel<\/em>, Preparations for the Gospel<\/em>, and On Discrepancies between the Gospels<\/em>, studies of the Biblical text. As “Father of Church History<\/a>” he produced the Ecclesiastical History<\/em><\/a>, On the Life of Pamphilus<\/em>, the Chronicle<\/em>and On the Martyrs<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Philo of Alexandria<\/strong> (Greek<\/a>: \u03a6\u03af\u03bb\u03c9\u03bd, Phil\u014dn<\/em>; c. 20 BCE \u2013 c. 50 CE), also called Philo Judaeus.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ragnar\u00f6k <\/strong>(abstract from wikipedia)<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Parece contar el diluvio universal y el juicio final. Cuenta como los \u201cdioses\u201d peleaban entre ellos y mor\u00edan en agua, para que luego la tierra se renovada y que dos personas la llenen de nuevo. Cuenta como al final la tierra ser\u00e1 quemada y el cielo no dar\u00e1 nuevamente su resplandor, pero todo esto orientado a los \u201cdioses\u201d y que ellos son los que provocan todo esto, no dando reconocimiento a DIOS ni sigui\u00e9ndole sino dando honra a las criaturas. Las interpretaciones, las fuentes y de misma manera este escrito deben de ser revisados para una interpretaci\u00f3n y descripci\u00f3n legitima.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Norse mythology<\/a>, Ragnar\u00f6k<\/strong> (UK<\/a> \/<\/a>\u02c8r\u0251\u02d0\u0261n\u0259\u02ccr\u0252k<\/a>\/<\/a>,[2]<\/sup><\/a> US<\/a> \/<\/a>\u02c8r\u00e6\u0261n\u0259\u02ccr\u0252k<\/a>\/<\/a>,[3]<\/sup><\/a>) is a series of future events, including a great battle foretold to ultimately result in the death of a number of major figures (including the gods<\/a> Odin<\/a>, Thor<\/a>, T\u00fdr<\/a>, Freyr<\/a>, Heimdallr<\/a>, and Loki<\/a>), the occurrence of various natural disasters, and the subsequent submersion of the world in water. Afterward, the world will resurface anew and fertile, the surviving and returning gods will meet, and the world will be repopulated by two human survivors. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Surtr covers the earth in fire, causing the entire world to burn. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Los dioses n\u00f3rdicos eran mortales, y solo a trav\u00e9s de las manzanas de I\u00f0unn<\/a> pod\u00edan esperar vivir hasta el Ragnar\u00f6k<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

TODAS LOS FALSOS DOGMAS ESTAN BASADOS EN UNA DISTORCION DE LA REALIDAD Y DE LA VERDAD, QUERIENDO EL HOMBRE SER DIOS ADORANDO A SATANAS, CON ANGUSTIA QUERIENDO LLEGAR A ESE LUGAR DE DONDE SALIO, POR SUS PROPIOS METODOS A ESE ESTADO DE DONDE CALLO!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Colosenses 2:8 (LBLA)<\/strong><\/a> | <\/strong>In Context<\/strong><\/a> | <\/strong>Whole Chapter<\/strong><\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Jesucristo: Dios, salvador y vencedor<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

8 <\/sup><\/strong>Mirad que nadie os haga cautivos por medio de su<\/em> filosof\u00eda y vanas sutilezas, seg\u00fan la tradici\u00f3n de los hombres, conforme a los principios elementales del mundo y no seg\u00fan Cristo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eurasiatic Languages \u2013 branches<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The branches of Eurasiatic vary between proposals, but typically include Altaic<\/a>, Chukchi-Kamchatkan<\/a>, Eskimo\u2013Aleut<\/a>, Indo-European<\/a>, and usually Uralic<\/a> (althoughJoseph Greenberg<\/a> uses the controversial Uralic-Yukaghir<\/a> instead). Other branches sometimes included are the Kartvelian<\/a> and Dravidian<\/a> families, the language isolates<\/a> Nivkh<\/a> and Etruscan<\/a>, and Greenberg’s “Korean-Japanese-Ainu.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

BUDDHA BIRTH<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Referring to the prophetic dream Queen Maya had prior to conception, the life story of the Buddha according to the Pali Cannon say that his mother did not engage in sexual activity or entertain any thoughts of other men during her pregnancy. It does not say that Siddhartha was conceived without sexual activity between his parents. [6]<\/sup><\/a> However, some parallels have been drawn with the birth story of Jesus<\/a>.[7]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Saint Nicholas<\/strong> (Greek<\/a>: \u1f0d\u03b3\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2 \u039d\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03bb\u03b1\u03bf\u03c2, Hagios Nik\u00f3laos<\/em>, Latin<\/a>: Sanctus Nicolaus<\/em>); (15 March 270 \u2013 6 December 343),[3]<\/sup><\/a>[4]<\/sup><\/a> also called Nikolaos of Myra<\/strong>, was a historic 4th-century Christian saint<\/a> and Greek<\/a>[5]<\/sup><\/a> Bishop of Myra<\/a> (Demre<\/a>, part of modern-day Turkey) in Lycia<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Church Fathers<\/strong> <\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Clement of Alexandria<\/a> referred to Buddhists and wrote:[2]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Among the Indians are those philosophers also who follow the precepts of Boutta, whom they honour as a god on account of his extraordinary sanctity.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Clement of Alexandria, Stromata<\/em><\/a> (Miscellanies), Book I, Chapter XV<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the 3rd century Indians were viewed by Christian as heretics<\/a>, with Hippolytus<\/a>, writing around 235:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is … among the Indians a heresy of those who philosophize among the Brahmins, who live a self-sufficient life, abstaining from (eating) living creatures and all cooked food . . . They say that God is light, not like the light one sees, nor like the sun nor fire, but to them God is discourse, not that which finds expression in articulate sounds, but that of knowledge (gnosis) through which the secret mysteries of nature are perceived by the wise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Early 3rd\u20134th century Christian writers such as Hippolytus<\/a> and Epiphanius<\/a> write of one Scythianus<\/a> who visited India around 50 CE, whence he brought the “doctrine of the Two Principles”. Scythianus’ pupil Terebinthus<\/a> supposedly presented himself as a “Buddha” (“he called himself Buddas” Cyril of Jerusalem<\/a>) and became well known inJudaea<\/a> and was said to have conversed with the apostles and to have brought books back from his trade with India. The same author says his books and knowledge were taken over by Mani<\/a>, and became the foundation of the Manichean doctrine<\/a>.[a]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Terebinthus, his disciple in this wicked error, inherited his money and books and heresy, and came to Palestine, and becoming known and condemned in Judaea he resolved to pass into Persia: but lest he should be recognised there also by his name he changed it and called himself Buddas.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014Cyril of Jerusalem<\/a>, Sixth Catechetical Lecture Chapter 22-24[27]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Saint Jerome<\/a> (4th century CE) mentions that the Buddhist belief of Buddha’s birth from a virgin as their “opinion […] authoritatively handed down that Budda, the founder of their religion, had his birth through the side of a virgin.”[28]<\/sup><\/a> (the Buddha was, according to Buddhist tradition, born from the hip of his mother).[29]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

apud gymnosophistas indiae, quasi per manus, hujus opinionis auctoritas traditur, quod buddam, principem dogmatis eorum, e latere suo virgo generarit.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

nec hoc mirum  de barbaris, cum minervam quoque de capite jovis, et liberum patrem de femore ejus procreatos doctissima finxerit graecia.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some knowledge of Buddhism existed quite early in the West.<\/strong> In the 2nd century CE, Clement of Alexandria<\/a>, the father of Christian dogmatism, wrote about the Buddha<\/a>:[2]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u03b5\u1f30\u03c3\u1f76 \u03b4\u1f72 \u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd \u1f38\u03bd\u03b4\u1ff6\u03bd \u03bf\u1f31 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2 \u0392\u03bf\u03cd\u03c4\u03c4\u03b1 \u03c0\u03b5\u03b9\u03b8\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03b3\u03b3\u03ad\u03bb\u03bc\u03b1\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd. \u1f43\u03bd \u03b4\u03b9\u2019 \u1f51\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b2\u03bf\u03bb\u1f74\u03bd \u03c3\u03b5\u03bc\u03bd\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 \u1f61\u03c2 \u03b8\u03b5\u1f78\u03bd \u03c4\u03b5\u03c4\u03b9\u03bc\u03ae\u03ba\u03b1\u03c3\u03b9. [Among the Indians are those philosophers also who follow the precepts of Boutta, whom they honour as a god on account of his extraordinary sanctity.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Clement of Alexandria<\/a>, Stromata<\/em><\/a> (Miscellanies), Book I, Chapter XV<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

He also recognized Bactrian Buddhists (Sramanas) and Indian Gymnosophists<\/a> for their influence on Greek thought:[3]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Thus philosophy, a thing of the highest utility, flourished in antiquity among the barbarians, shedding its light over the nations. And afterwards it came to Greece<\/a>. First in its ranks were the prophets of the Egyptians<\/a>; and the Chaldeans<\/a> among the Assyrians<\/a>; and the Druids<\/a> among theGauls<\/a>; and the Sramanas<\/strong> among the Bactrians<\/a> (“\u03a3\u03b1\u03c1\u03bc\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03af\u03bf\u03b9 \u0392\u03ac\u03ba\u03c4\u03c1\u03c9\u03bd”); and the philosophers of the Celts<\/a>; and the Magi<\/a> of the Persians<\/a>, who foretold the Saviour’s birth, and came into the land of Judaea<\/a> guided by a star<\/a>. The Indian gymnosophists are also in the number, and the other barbarian philosophers. And of these there are two classes, some of them called Sramanas<\/strong> (“\u03a3\u03b1\u03c1\u03bc\u03ac\u03bd\u03b1\u03b9”), and others Brahmins<\/a> (“\u0392\u03c1\u03b1\u03c6\u03bc\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03b9”).”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Clement of Alexandria<\/a>, Stromata<\/em><\/a> (Miscellanies)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ganapati Atharvashirsa<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ghurye notes its emergence in the early 19th century, corresponding to the rise of the Ganapati worship in Maharashtra among Brahmins centered in Pune,[3]<\/sup><\/a> but the text is probably somewhat older, dating to the 17th or 18th century;[4]<\/sup><\/a> it is not part of the Muktik\u0101<\/a> canon of 108 Upanishads compiled in the mid 17th century.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chinmayananda<\/strong> Saraswati (8 May 1916 \u2013 3 August 1993)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dharma Data:<\/strong> Buddhacarita<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was not until the 2nd century AD that the first complete biographies of the Buddha<\/a> were written. At this time two works both titled Buddhacarita, meaning the life of the Buddha, were composed by monk poets at the court of the great Buddhist emperor Kaniska. The first of these was written by Sangharaksa and was a combination of verse and prose, and although the original Sanskrit has been lost, a Chinese translation of it still exists. The second of these works was written by the celebrated poet Asvaghosa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 28 chapters Asvaghosa uses striking imagery and polished language to tell the Buddha’s life from his birth to events immediately after his death. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Jataka<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Jataka means “the story of a birth,” and the Jatakas are stories, in a mixture of prose and verse, of the 550 lives through which Gautama Buddha is said to have passed before his birth as Prince Siddhartha of the Sakya clan in northern India (563 B.C.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In his earlier births Gautama is said to have been a Pali Bodhisatta (a being destined to acheive enlightenment), who in each life, born as an animal, person, or god, moves a step closer to perfect wisdom. The perfect wisdom being the attainment of Buddha (an “Enlightened Being”).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The arrangement of the Jataka as we have it today may have been made as late as the fourth century A.D. based on the text preserved by Sri Lankan (place) Buddhist monks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rome <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Livy’s (Titus Livius Patavinus<\/strong> (59 BC \u2013 AD 17)\u2014known as Livy<\/strong> in English<\/a>\u2014was a Roman<\/a> historian who wrote a monumental history of Rome<\/a> and the Roman people.) account of the legend she was the daughter of Numitor<\/a>, king of Alba Longa<\/a>, and descended from Aeneas<\/a>. Numitor’s younger brother Amulius<\/a> seized the throne and killed Numitor’s son, then forced Rhea Silvia to become a Vestal Virgin<\/a>, a priestess of the goddess Vesta<\/a>. As Vestal Virgins were sworn to celibacy for a period of thirty years, this would ensure the line of Numitor had no heirs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sutras of JESUS <\/strong>(SECULAR)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 1907, explorers discovered a vast treasure trove of ancient scrolls, silk paintings, and artifacts dating from the 5th to 11th centuries A.D.  in a long-sealed cave in a remote region of China.  Among them, written in Chinese, were scrolls that recounted a history of Jesus’ life and teachings in beautiful Taoist concepts and imagery that were unknown in the West. These writings told a story of Christianity that was by turns unique and disturbing, hopeful and uplifting. The best way to describe them is collectively, with a term they themselves use: The Jesus Sutras.

The origins of Christianity seem rooted in Western civilization, but amazingly, an ancient, largely unknown branch of Christian belief evolved in the East. Eminent theologian and Chinese scholar Martin Palmer provides the first popular history and translation of the sect’s long-lost scriptures–all of them more than a thousand years old and comparable in significance to the Dead Sea Scrolls. Gathered, deciphered, and interpreted by a team of expert linguists and scholars, these sacred texts present an inspiring use of Jesus’ teachings and life within Eastern practices and meditations–and provide an extraordinary window into an intriguing, profoundly gentler, more spiritual Christianity than existed in Europe or Asia at the time, or, indeed, even today.

Palmer has devoted more than a decade to seeking the extant writings and other evidence of this lost religion.  His search was triggered by an encounter with an immense, mysterious carved (stele) stone from the 8th century that resides in a Chinese museum collection called the Forest of Stones. The Chinese text on this stone commemorates the founding of a “religion of light” in China by a great Western teacher and features a unique cross that merges Taoist symbolism with the Christian cross. The scrolls, the stone, and a strange map of the area around a hallowed temple (where Lao Tzu wrote the Tao Te Ching before disappearing forever) gave Palmer enough information to rediscover one of the earliest Christian monasteries.  At the site was an  8th century pagoda still intact, and within it, in 1998, Palmer and his team found more evidence, including statues, underground passageways, and artifacts, that helped them uncover and recreate the era and rituals of the Taoist Christians.  

The Taoist Christians, who wrote the Jesus Sutras recognized equality of the sexes, preached against slavery, and practiced nonviolence toward all forms of life. In particular, this tradition offered its followers a more hopeful vision of life on earth and after death than the dominant Eastern religions, teaching that Jesus had broken the wheel of karma and its consequent punishing, endless reincarnations.

Vividly re-creating the turbulence of a distant age that is remarkably evocative of our own times, Palmer reveals an extraordinary evolution of spiritual thought that spans centuries. A thrilling modern quest that is also an ancient religious odyssey, The Jesus Sutras shares a revolutionary discovery with profound historical implications–imparting timeless messages and lessons for men and women of all backgrounds and faiths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

R\u0101hula<\/strong> (born c. 534 BC) son of Siddhartha Gautama<\/a> (P\u0101li<\/em> Siddhattha Gotama), later known as the Buddha<\/a>, and his wife Princess Yasodhar\u0101<\/a>. Accounts of his life differ in certain points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La \u00fanica diferencia aparte entre el nuevo-hinduismo y el nuevo-budismo es la NO aceptaci\u00f3n de DIOS, la NO aceptaci\u00f3n de la VERDAD, tratando escapar de EL.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a detach from re-incarnation in new-hinduism called mok\u1e63a<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Theravada<\/a> Buddhism<\/a>, the Jatakas are a textual division of the Pali Canon<\/a>, included in the Khuddaka Nikaya<\/a> of theSutta Pitaka<\/a>. The term Jataka<\/em> may also refer to a traditional commentary on this book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A buddha is called “The World Honored (high respected; esteemed; adherence to what is right or to a conventional standard of conduct) Enlightened One” (Skt. Buddha-Lokanatha<\/em>) or “The Blessed Enlightened One” (Skt. Buddha-Bhagavan<\/em>).[6]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bhagavan (blessed)<\/em><\/strong>, also written Bhagwan<\/em><\/strong> or Bhagawan<\/em><\/strong>, from the Sanskrit<\/a> nt<\/em>-stem bhaga-vant-<\/em> (nominative \u092d\u0917\u0935\u093e\u0928\u094d Bhagav\u0101n<\/em>) literally means “possessing fortune, prosperous” (from the noun bhaga<\/em><\/a>, meaning “fortune, wealth”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Buddha means awake.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shakya<\/strong> (Sanskrit<\/a>: \u015a\u0101kya, Devanagari<\/a>: \u0936\u093e\u0915\u094d\u092f, P\u0101li<\/a>: S\u0101kya) is a Suryavanshi<\/a> [1]<\/sup><\/a> Kshatriya<\/a> [2]<\/sup><\/a> clan of the ancient Vedic period<\/a>(1500-500 BC)<\/em>. The name is derived from the Sanskrit<\/a> word \u015bakya which means capable, able.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lance Selwyn Cousins<\/strong> is a scholar in the field of Buddhist Studies<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a review<\/strong><\/a> <\/strong>of this most recent translation (<\/strong>Majjhima Nikaya<\/a>), <\/strong>L. S. Cousins<\/strong><\/a> <\/strong>(before getting down to details) makes various general criticisms:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n