{"id":6397,"date":"2022-01-13T16:46:19","date_gmt":"2022-01-13T21:46:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/?p=6397"},"modified":"2022-01-17T16:45:21","modified_gmt":"2022-01-17T21:45:21","slug":"viruses-and-vaccines-batch-codes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/2022\/01\/13\/viruses-and-vaccines-batch-codes\/","title":{"rendered":"Viruses and vaccines batch codes"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Malone contracted COVID-19 in February 2020, and later got the Moderna vaccine in hopes that it would alleviate his long-haul symptoms. [t]he injections made his symptoms worse: He still has a cough and is dealing with hypertension and reduced stamina, among other maladies. \u201cMy body will never be the same\u201d. In media appearances, he often notes that he has colleagues in the government and at universities who agree with him and are privately cheering him on. https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/science\/archive\/2021\/08\/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic\/619734\/<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wuhan scientists planned to release coronavirus particles into cave bats, leaked papers reveal<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Documents reveal researchers applied for $14m to fund controversial project in 2018 21 September 2021 \u2022 5:48pm<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Daily
Workers wearing protective clothing disinfect a shopping centre in Wuhan Credit: China News Service<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Wuhan and US scientists were planning to release enhanced airborne coronavirus particles into Chinese bat populations to inoculate them against diseases that could jump to humans, leaked grant proposals dating from 2018 show.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New documents show that just 18 months before the first Covid-19 cases appeared<\/a>, researchers had submitted plans to release skin-penetrating nanoparticles and aerosols containing \u201cnovel chimeric spike proteins\u201d of bat coronaviruses into cave bats in Yunnan, China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They also planned to create chimeric viruses, genetically enhanced to infect humans more easily, and requested $14million from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) <\/a>to fund the work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Papers, confirmed as genuine by a former member of the Trump administration, show they were hoping to introduce \u201chuman-specific cleavage sites\u201d to bat coronaviruses which would make it easier for the virus to enter human cells.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When Covid-19 was first genetically sequenced, scientists were puzzled about how the virus had evolved such a human-specific adaptation at the cleavage site on the spike protein, which is the reason it is so infectious.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The documents were released by Drastic, the web-based investigations team set up by scientists from across the world to look into the origins of Covid-19.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a statement, Drastic said: \u201cGiven that we find in this proposal a discussion of the planned introduction of human-specific cleavage sites, a review by the wider scientific community of the plausibility of artificial insertion is warranted.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The proposal also included plans to mix high-risk natural coronavirus strains with more infectious but less dangerous varieties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bid was submitted by British zoologist Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, the US-based organisation, which has worked closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researching bat coronaviruses. Team members included Dr Shi Zhengli, the WIV researcher dubbed \u201cbat woman\u201d, pictured below, as well as US researchers from the University of North Carolina and the United States Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Centre.Dr Shi ZhengliDarpa refused to fund the work, saying: \u201cIt is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk\u201d, and warned that the team had not properly considered the dangers of enhancing the virus (gain of function research) or releasing a vaccine by air.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Grant documents show that the team also had some concerns about the vaccine programme and said they would \u201cconduct educational outreach \u2026 so that there is a public understanding of what we are doing and why we are doing it, particularly because of the practice of bat-consumption in the region\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St Georges, University of London, who struggled to get work published showing that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had been carrying out \u201cgain of function\u201d work for years before the pandemic, said the research may have gone ahead even without the funding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is clearly a gain of function, engineering the cleavage site and polishing the new viruses to enhance human cell infectibility in more than one cell line,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Daszak was also behind a letter published in The Lancet last yea<\/a>r which effectively shut down scientific debate into the origins of Covid-19.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Wuhan
Residents in Wuhan are tested for coronavirus in April 2020 CREDIT: Roman Pilipey\/Shutterstock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Viscount Ridley, who has co-authored a book on the origin of Covid-19, due for release in November, and who has frequently called for a further investigation into what caused the pandemic in the House of Lords, said: \u201cFor more than a year I tried repeatedly to ask questions of Peter Daszak with no response.Advertisement<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cNow it turns out he had authored this vital piece of information about virus work in Wuhan but refused to share it with the world. I am furious. So should the world be. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cPeter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) proposed injecting deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into humanised and \u2018batified\u2019 mice, and much, much more.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Covid-19 researcher from the World Health Organisation (WHO)<\/a>, who wished to remain anonymous, said it was alarming that the grant proposal included plans to enhance the more deadly disease of Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome (Mers).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe scary part is they were making infectious chimeric Mers viruses,\u201d the source said. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThese viruses have a fatality rate over 30 per cent, which is at least an order of magnitude more deadly than Sars-CoV-2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIf one of their receptor replacements made Mers spread similarly, while maintaining its lethality, this pandemic would be nearly apocalyptic.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology have been aproached for comment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/2021\/09\/21\/wuhan-scientists-planned-releaseskin-penetrating-nanoparticles\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

How to check AstraZeneca batch number: Covid vaccine numbers made in India \u2013 and how it affects travel<\/strong> The jabs \u2013 up to five millions of which have been administered in the UK \u2013 were manufactured by the Serum Institute of India https:\/\/inews.co.uk\/inews-lifestyle\/travel\/astrazeneca-batch-number-check-how-covid-vaccine-numbers-made-india-uk-eu-travel-1083092<\/p>\n\n\n\n

COVID-19: UK will work to ensure travel to Europe after fears three batches of vaccine won’t be accepted by EU<\/strong> It is feared millions won’t qualify for the EU’s vaccine passport scheme because they received shots manufactured in India. By Greg Heffer, Political reporter @GregHeffer<\/a> Friday 2 July 2021 14:41, UK https:\/\/news.sky.com\/story\/covid-19-britons-reassured-over-fears-those-who-received-india-made-covishield-jabs-cant-travel-to-eu-12347013<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.howbadismybatch.com\/<\/a> Batch codes and associated deaths, disabilities and illnesses for Covid 19 Vaccines<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

“How Bad is my Batch”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The story of my vaccine injury<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I actually do have a personal life. In fact, my wife of of 42 years and I are actually pretty private. Sharing personal history is not something I do everyday. However, as many of you know – I was vaccinated with Moderna twice and had a pretty significant vaccine injury. This was pretty early in the roll-out of the vaccines. It was long before the FOIA Japanese pre-clinical trial data that had so many red-flags and irregularities, long before we learned of all the issues with the clinical trials, and long before the VAERs and adverse events began to be known.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To write it, I have never been an \u201canti-vax\u201d person. I have spent my career working with vaccines. I also know that some vaccines are \u201chot,\u201d and are less safe. Usually these types of vaccines are reserved for extremely dangerous viruses like Ebola or Yellow fever. Where the goal is to make the vaccine 100% effective. Other vaccines, that are distributed widely, like the flu vaccines need to be very safe. The trade-off being that they are less effective. There is a whole science and art to crafting vaccines to appropriately respond to the \u201cthreat.\u201d So, I know to read the literature, do my own due- diligence, etc before taking an experimental product or any vaccine. That is what I thought I did. The government assured us that these vaccines were very safe. I could never imagine that clinical data would be corrupted and even falsified – as we now know it was.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anyway, back to my story. I knew in the beginning of April, 2021, that I had to travel overseas and the word on the street was that the European Union was going to require full vaccination before entering any EU country by summer (that actually never happened BTW). I knew that a full vaccination protocol was a process of weeks – and that i had better get started! Furthermore, there was a lot of buzz around the idea that vaccination would help with \u201clong-COVID.\u201d I had already had COVID, and just couldn\u2019t shake a number of chronic issues that I had developed after getting the disease. Frankly, I should have done more homework on that one- because this idea really didn\u2019t hold up to scrutiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Be that as it may, in April, 2021, I got vaccinated. It was early enough in the cycle, that I had no choice but to take the Moderna vaccine, as that was available in my area The vaccine was distributed at a local college, with the Army reserves administering the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first shot was fine. No issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second shot almost did me in. As in I almost died.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After the injection, I had the usual fatigue, muscle-ache and then the palpitations started, as well as shortness of breath. Within a couple days, it got worse – I am not someone who goes to the doctor easily, but luckily for me, I happened to have a routine appointment with my physician. She cuffed me and my systolic blood pressure was through the roof. As she is also a cardiologist, she had more tests run, started me on high blood pressure meds and we got it under control. I kind of feel like I owe her my life. A call out to the fantastic Dr. C. Bove.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fast forward to today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the people who comments on my Substack articles, pointed me to this website:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.howbadismybatch.com\/
This site matches up vaccine batch codes with information from the VAERS system, which is the event reporting system run by the CDC. This site matches the vaccine batches to adverse drug reactions, death, disability and life threatening illnesses from the VAERS system<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the website above, the data reported in VAERS, reproduced on the site, show that adverse events triggered by Moderna batches have varied widely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n