LEAKED DATABASE SHOWS U.S. MILITARY DISEASE SKYROCKETING AFTER COVID-19 INOCULATIONS https:\/\/www.bitchute.com\/video\/7rhmwgEUA4wd\/ First published at 18:47 UTC on January 31st, 2022. Wardo Rants<\/a> Wardo-Rants<\/a> 18971 subscribers<\/p>\n\n\n\n February 1, 2022 The Honorable Lloyd J. Austin III Secretary Department of Defense Dear Secretary Austin: 1 Press Release, VIDEO RELEASE Sen. Ron Johnson COVID-19: A Second Opinion Panel Garners Over 800,000 Views in 24 Hours, Jan. 25, 2022, https:\/\/www ronjohnson.senate.gov\/2022\/1\/video-release-sen-ron-johnson-covid19-a-second-opinion-panel-garners-over-800-000-views-in-24-hours. 2 COVID-19: A Second Opinion, Rumble, Jan. 22, 2022, https:\/\/rumble.com\/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html The Honorable Lloyd Austin February 1, 2022 Page 2 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, 5 COVID-19: A Second Opinion, Rumble, Jan. 22, 2022, https:\/\/rumble.com\/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html The Honorable Lloyd Austin February 1, 2022 OP-ED<\/a><\/a>DANIEL HOROWITZ<\/a> February 02, 2022 https:\/\/www.theblaze.com\/op-ed\/horowitz-military-spokesman-claims-5-random-years-of-dod-medical-surveillance-system-were-plagued-by-a-giant-glitch The military\u2019s vital national security shield depends on the health of its service members. According to a spokesman for the Defense Health Agency, every data point for five years in the agency\u2019s entire epidemiological surveillance system \u2013 Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) \u2013 was one giant glitch. Oh, and that glitch magically stopped in January 2021, but it still wasn\u2019t detected until Thomas Renz testified<\/a> before Sen. Ron Johnson last Monday that this data existed!<\/p>\n\n\n\n Last Monday, attorney Thomas Renz came forward with DMED data<\/a> downloaded by several named and unnamed military physicians showing unnatural increases in numerous medical diagnoses in the military in 2021, completely out of sync with the previous five-year averages. He presented hundreds of these concerning safety signal data points to Sen. Ron Johnson last week and publicized several examples at the hearing. Three military doctors signed a sworn affidavit to be used in a federal lawsuit attesting to the fact that the data correlates with their clinical experience in treating soldiers in 2021 and that in their professional opinion, the mass vaccination is the most likely culprit of these increased injuries and ailments.Don’t miss out on content from Dave Rubin free of big tech censorship. Listen to The Rubin Report now.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Here are a few of the data points out of hundreds of ICD codes showing a massive increase in 2021 outpatient diagnoses over the preceding five-year average. They are detailed in a letter from Sen. Ron Johnson<\/a> to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin:<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is in addition to the original data Renz revealed to Sen. Johnson showing a tenfold increase in diagnoses for neurological issues, a 300% increase in miscarriage diagnoses, and a total cancer diagnosis increase of about 300%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One would think this data would be the biggest national news story for the ensuing week, but the revelation was met with radio silence. Then, late Monday night, PolitiFact finally drops<\/a> its obligatory \u201cfact-check\u201d and posts the first and only response from a defense official. Shockingly, they validate the data, but suggest without cause that somehow the 2016-2020 data in the system was all a glitch and that they will get to the bottom of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Officials compared numbers in the DMED with source data in the DMSS and found that the total number of medical diagnoses from those years “represented only a small fraction of actual medical diagnoses.” The 2021 numbers, however, were up-to-date, giving the “appearance of significant increased occurrence of all medical diagnoses in 2021 because of the underreported data for 2016-2020,” Graves said.<\/p> The DMED system has been taken offline to “identify and correct the root-cause of the data corruption,” Graves said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n What\u2019s next? Are they going to tell us the VAERS data from 1990 through 2020 was just a glitch, in order to accommodate the new 2021 sky-high baseline?<\/p>\n\n\n\n This statement, taken at face value, is the equivalent of a political and national security nuclear bomb that requires immediate follow-up questions just to make sense of it, yet PolitiFact takes this absurdity at face value and goes on to rule the articles on the DMED data \u201cfalse.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Putting aside the feasibility of such a statement for a moment, the implication of this assertion would be that the entire military health surveillance system was 100% broken on every diagnosis code for five straight years. This is the expensive database whose purpose is described<\/a> by the military as \u201cgranting military health officials unprecedented access to epidemiologic data on active component service members and tailored queries that respond in a timely and efficient manner.\u201d That in itself is a huge national security issue, and Thomas Renz and his military whistleblowers deserve a medal for \u201cdiscovering\u201d it. Why would the Defense Health Agency not have put out a press release to inform the public and instead allow this to be used as a parsimonious statement in a fact-check article? If this is really about the health of the military and not just about defending the vaccine at all costs, then why wouldn\u2019t the military have come clean in a more direct way?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Now, onto the substance of the claim. Here are some obvious problems with the statement of Mr. Graves:<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1) We are to believe that somehow a data system that was designed to be monitored constantly was worthless and underreported for five years, but then magically reset to the proper baseline on its own in January 2021; however, the mistake of the previous five years was still not discovered until the whistleblowers came forward a year later?<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2) There is nothing unique about the years 2016-2020. Those just happened to be the arbitrary years that the whistleblowers used to establish a baseline from which to compare the 2021 data. Why would this magic glitch affect only affect those years \u2013 not a year before and not a year after?<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3) How could there be a glitch that underreports every single ICD code imaginable, not just one or two?<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4) How are they so certain that the five-year numbers are low while 2021 data is normal when they still haven\u2019t discovered the source of the supposed glitch?<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5) The raw numbers of the 2021 data are awfully high. If that is a normal<\/em> year, then don\u2019t we have a terribly unhealthy active-duty military?<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6) The DMED data is not what drove these military doctors to blow the whistle; it was their clinical experience in the military dealing with vaccine injuries and the constant opposition they received from the chain of command in requesting help for diagnosing and treating these injuries. The 2021 data as an anomaly from the previous five years would harmonize more with their clinical experience than the glitch hypothesis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7) If every diagnosis from the previous five years only reported a \u201cfraction\u201d of ICD codes, then wouldn\u2019t that be evident in every<\/em> diagnosis, including ones that would conceivably have nothing to do with a vaccine injury? Instead, released data (posted here<\/a> and verified by my source) confirms that the number of diagnoses for things like Lyme disease, tick-borne diseases, and Chagas \u2013 ailments we can safely theorize would not be affected by the vaccine \u2013 were not meaningfully higher in 2021 than the previous years. But if there was underreporting in the previous years, shouldn\u2019t that be the case with every ICD code, not just the ones causing neurological, hematological, pulmonary, cardio, and reproductive disorders as well as cancers?<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8) The diversity and magnitude of the individual numbers are too revealing to dismiss them as a glitch. If the vaccines were indeed the culprit, neurological disorders are exactly what one would expect to increase more than anything else. This harmonizes perfectly with Pfizer\u2019s own cumulative post-authorization safety data reported to its system during the first few months of vaccination. In the 38-page document<\/a>, obtained in a FOIA lawsuit by judicial ruling, Pfizer discloses the existence of 42,086 adverse event case reports containing 158,893 total events, including 1,227 deaths. The single largest category of serious injuries was classified as \u201cNervous system disorders.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Isn\u2019t the media the least bit curious about any of this? And if the Department of Defense is now taking down the system so these doctors cannot make further queries of the data, who is to say they will not doctor the data? Sen. Johnson sent a letter to the Secretary of Defense on Jan. 24 asking him to preserve all the DMED data and make sure none of it is tampered with. One of the whistleblowers has already alleged that some of the myocarditis data has been tampered with.https:\/\/playlist.megaphone.fm\/?e=BMDC9867124336<\/p>\n\n\n\n After receiving no response, Johnson sent another letter on Tuesday<\/a> asking if DOD was aware of any of the aforementioned alarming data points and if the department has an explanation for it. After all, it\u2019s pretty odd that our military would respond first to PolitiFact rather than a senator. OP-ED<\/a><\/a>DANIEL HOROWITZ<\/a> January 26, 2022 https:\/\/www.theblaze.com\/op-ed\/horowitz-whistleblowers-share-dod-medical-data-that-blows-vaccine-safety-debate-wide-open<\/p>\n\n\n\n Data, transparency, and surveillance. That is what has been missing from the greatest experiment on humans of all time throughout this pandemic. Now, military medical whistleblowers have come forward with what they claim is perhaps the most accurate and revealing data set on vaccine safety one could possibly find.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The pro-pharma politicians and media claim the CDC\u2019s pharmacosurveillance tool \u201cVAERS\u201d is not good enough to trigger investigations into the shots because anyone can supposedly submit a vaccine adverse event entry. Thus, all the concerning safety signals from VAERS are being ignored, even though that system was put in place as a consolation to the public for absolving vaccine manufacturers of liability. Well, now some military whistleblowers are coming forward to present data that, if verified, would signal extremely disturbing safety concerns about the vaccine that make the VAERS data look like child\u2019s play.<\/p>\n\n\n\n On Monday, during Sen. Ron Johnson\u2019s five-hour hearing on a \u201cCOVID-19: Second Opinion<\/a>,\u201d Ohio attorney Thomas Renz, who has been representing clients suing the vaccine mandates, presented DOD medical billing data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) that paints a shockingly disturbing picture of the health of our service members in 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Attorney Thomas Renz reveals what multiple DoD whistleblowers have provided on the safety signals they are seeing \\n\\nThese numbers are mind blowing! \\n\\n@SenRonJohnsonpic.twitter.com\/gs4fhwF1Po<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2014 Chief Nerd (@Chief Nerd) 1643052460<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the military,<\/a> DMED is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch\u2019s (AFHSB) \u201cweb-based tool to remotely query de-identified active component personnel and medical event data contained within the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS).\u201d In other words, it contains every ICD medical billing code for any medical diagnosis in the military submitted for medical insurance billing during any given period of time. Three military doctors have presented queried data to Renz that shows a shocking and sudden spike in nearly every ICD code for common vaccine injuries in 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In a declaration under penalty of perjury that Renz plans to use in federal court, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long \u2014 three military doctors \u2014 revealed that there has been a 300% increase in DMED codes registered for miscarriages in the military in 2021 over the five-year average. The five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182. As Renz explained to me in an interview with TheBlaze, these doctors queried the numbers for hundreds of codes from 2016 through 2020 to establish a baseline five-year average. These codes were generally for ailments and injuries that medical literature has established as being potential adverse effects of the vaccines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Renz told me the numbers tended to be remarkably similar in all those preceding years, including in 2020, which was the first year of the pandemic but before the vaccines were distributed. But then in 2021, the numbers skyrocketed, and the 2021 data doesn\u2019t even include the months of November and December. For example, some public health officials speculate that COVID itself places women at higher risk for miscarriages. But the number of miscarriage codes recorded in 2020 was actually slightly below the five-year average (1,477). However, they were not drastically below the average on any one category in a way that one can suggest it reflects lockdown-related decreases in doctor\u2019s visits, which somehow led to an increase in 2021 diagnoses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The database has all the ICD codes for both military hospital visits and ambulatory visits. The data presented by Renz so far is all from the query of ambulatory diagnosis data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Aside from the spike in miscarriage diagnoses (ICD code O03 for spontaneous abortions), there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in diagnosis codes for neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000!<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some other numbers he did not mention at the hearing but gave to me in the interview are the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n All these numbers are among the ambulatory visits because those are where the vast number of diagnoses in the military occur. However, Renz did say the increases were indicated in the hospitalized patients as well. I have seen one of the sworn declarations from one of the military doctors, and it states as follows, \u201cIt is my professional opinion that the major increases incidences of the above discussed instances of miscarriages, cancers, and disease were due to COVID-19 \u2018vaccinations.'”<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Renz, it was the actual clinical experience of the three named doctors and several unnamed doctors that led them to investigate DMED, and their discoveries reflected their experience treating patients with ailments extremely unusual to healthy, young soldiers since the rollout of the vaccines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I have spoken to one of the whistleblowers who attests to being gravely concerned with seeing young soldiers with sudden metastatic cancers, auto-immune diseases, and heart and circulatory disorders that have caused many soldiers to drop out of various training programs. \u201cThese doctors were motivated to explore DMED data due to the numbers of case increases they were seeing empirically,\u201d said the whistleblower, who served in the military for many years. \u201cSome physicians throughout the force (all branches) have been intimidated by commands not to perform the full spectrum of testing and adhere to the regulations, which implicitly direct full workups for EUA vaccination adverse reactions. It will require other military physicians to step forward and share experiences to fully ascertain the enormity of these allegations and engender an investigation to the fullest extent.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Renz claims he has a video with two witnesses showing the entire process of downloading this data from the database and is prepared to present it in court. He also told me that this is just \u201cthe tip of the iceberg,\u201d as the codes have increased exponentially in numerous other diagnosis categories. Renz said his spreadsheet, which includes over 100 medical diagnosis categories, was shared with Senator Johnson and his staff before the Monday hearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It\u2019s important to note that these numbers do not represent the number of individual people<\/em> diagnosed with various ailments, but number of diagnoses codes used in totality at a given time. For example, someone who has a stroke is obviously going to rack up numerous neurological ICD codes over the course of a year with multiple ambulatory and hospital visits. However, the apples-to-apples comparison from the previous five years clearly shows an unmistakable spike in ailments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If these numbers are verified in the upcoming court cases, then absent some massive military insurance fraud or bizarre glitch in the system, it potentially paints a shocking picture of vaccine safety concerns that would indicate that not only were the VAERS safety signals something that should immediately have been followed up on, but they are plagued by woeful underreporting. The military is a defined, finite, and closely controlled and monitored population. They are also overwhelmingly young and healthy. If allegations of neurological, cardio, and cancer concerns surrounding the vaccines are indeed true, the military would be the most revealing place to discover it, and their data is the most reliable and undisputable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n DMED is quite literally an epidemiological<\/em> surveillance program designed for the express purpose of detecting surges in illness and injury to make sure the military is combat-ready. It\u2019s about national security even more than public health. Why would the military not have blown the whistle and warned the CDC right away about this data? On the military health system website<\/a>, the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division (AFHSD) is described as \u201cthe central epidemiologic resource for the U.S. Armed Forces, conducting medical surveillance to protect those who serve our nation in uniform and allies who are critical to our national security interests.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n How could the blaring and glaring surveillance signals of a lifetime be ignored by the Defense Health Agency (DHA), and how was this not conveyed to the general public? The question is why the military public health analysts have not been communicating with military doctors about the shocking spikes in diagnoses this year and why they have not put out any analysis explaining it.https:\/\/playlist.megaphone.fm\/?e=BMDC8047582230<\/p>\n\n\n\n For his part, Sen. Ron Johnson said at the Monday hearing that he put DOD on notice that it better not delete any of the data. \u201cThe Department of Defense, the Biden administration is on notice they must preserve these records and this must be investigated,\u201d said Johnson. Renz testified at the hearing that some of the myocarditis data was slid backwards since the doctors originally downloaded it last year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Even if somehow these earth-shattering increases have nothing to do with the vaccines, isn\u2019t it important that our government investigate what appears to be a catastrophic decline in the health of our active-duty fighting force? After all, the DMED data was designed for this very purpose. \u201cA person can do a research paper just on this data alone,\u201d said one of the whistleblowers I spoke to. \u201cIt was designed for this very purpose. The amount of data points you could query is nearly unlimited.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The bottom line according to Renz is that the onus of proof is on the government, not on the military personnel and citizens being forced to take the shots. If the manufacturers are exempt from liability for government coercion to use their product, and the only pharmacological safety data we have is completely ignored, then where is the recourse of the people to redress safety concerns? In the opinion of the Ohio attorney, if the shots are safe and effective, then the Pentagon should have no problem explaining the source of these gargantuan increases in instances of numerous illnesses. Transparency is the most potent cure of a pandemic of secrecy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Can an alternator be used as a generator? Yes, you can use an alternator as a generator in the following ways:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n https:\/\/portablepowerguides.com\/can-an-alternator-be-used-as-generator\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n February 4, 2021 According to the latest data from the ZOE COVID Symptom Study people who have had a previous COVID-19 infection are almost twice as likely to experience one or more mild whole body (systemic) after effects compared to people who didn\u2019t have COVID-19 (33% vs 19%) from a Pfizer\/BioNTech vaccine dose. The most common mild whole body (systemic) after effects experienced were fatigue (9%), headache (8%) and chills or shivers (4%). Most mild whole body (systemic) after effects appeared in the first two days after the vaccination and only 3% of people have any after effects beyond three days. https:\/\/covid.joinzoe.com\/post\/vaccine-after-effects-more-common-in-those-who-already-had-covid<\/p>\n\n\n\n The COVID Symptom Study<\/strong>, formerly the COVID Symptom Tracker<\/strong>,[1]<\/a><\/sup> is a COVID-19<\/a>epidemiological<\/a> research mobile app<\/a> developed in the United Kingdom that runs on Android<\/a> and iOS<\/a>. It is a collaboration between King’s College London<\/a>, Guy’s<\/a> and St Thomas’ Hospitals<\/a> and Zoe Global<\/a> Limited, with funding granted by the UK government. The purpose of the app is to track symptoms and other salient data in a large number of people to enable epidemiological results to be calculated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n [1]<\/sup> Chan, Andrew; Spector, Tim (11 May 2020). “Coronavirus: research reveals way to predict infection \u2013 without a test”<\/a>. The Conversation<\/em>. Archived<\/a> from the original on 12 May 2020. Retrieved 12 May 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Virology. 1995 Jan 10;206(1):520-6. doi: 10.1016\/s0042-6822(95)80068-9. Coat protein of the Ectocarpus siliculosus virus<\/strong> M Klein<\/a> 1<\/a><\/sup>, S T Lanka<\/a>, R Knippers<\/a>, D G M\u00fcller<\/a>Affiliations expand PMID: 7831806<\/strong> DOI: 10.1016\/s0042-6822(95)80068-9<\/a> Ectocarpus siliculosus virus, EsV, multiplies in sporangia and gametangia of the marine brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. We describe an improved method for the isolation of morphologically intact and infectious virus from diseased plants. We show that treatment of virus particles with high concentrations of CsCl results in a substantial loss of structural proteins. One of the proteins which resists CsCl treatment is glycoprotein-1, the largest of the three viral glycoproteins. We have isolated an EsV genomic fragment with an open reading frame encoding glycoprotein-1. The predicted amino acid sequence is rich in hydrophilic amino acids, but contains hydrophobic regions close to the amino and carboxy termini. A discrepancy between the molecular weight predicted from the coding region and the molecular weight determined by gel electrophoresis suggests that proteolytic processing is required for the maturation of the protein. https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/7831806\/<\/p>\n\n\n\n Virology. 1994 Aug 1;202(2):1076-8. doi: 10.1006\/viro.1994.1443. Single-stranded regions in the genome of the Ectocarpus siliculosus virus M Klein<\/a> 1<\/a><\/sup>, S Lanka<\/a>, D M\u00fcller<\/a>, R Knippers<\/a>Affiliations expand PMID: 8030215<\/strong> DOI: 10.1006\/viro.1994.1443<\/a> The double-stranded DNA genome of the Ectocarpus siliculosus virus, EsV, is interrupted by numerous single-stranded gaps. We have investigated whether single-stranded regions occur at random or at specific sites. A brief treatment with a single-strand-specific endonuclease dissected the genome into two large fragments, but more extensive treatment produced a spectrum of nuclease-resistant fragments, mainly 10 to 70 kb in size. Native EsV DNA was also used as a substrate for gap-filling DNA synthesis. Restriction analysis revealed that essentially all of the 60 or more SacI restriction fragments became labeled but a few fragments were more intensely labeled than others. The EsV genome may contain a few extended single-stranded regions at fixed sites in addition to numerous single-stranded regions probably occurring at random and varying sites. https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/8030215\/<\/p>\n\n\n\n Virology<\/a>. 1993 Apr;193(2):802-11. doi: 10.1006\/viro.1993.1189.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Genome structure of a virus infecting the marine brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus S T Lanka<\/a> 1<\/a><\/sup>, M Klein<\/a>, U Ramsperger<\/a>, D G M\u00fcller<\/a>, R Knippers<\/a>Affiliations expand PMID: 8460486<\/strong> DOI: 10.1006\/viro.1993.1189<\/a> Abstract We describe a procedure for the isolation of virus particles from the marine brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. Virus particles are composed of at least 13 different polypeptides, including two glycoproteins, and double-stranded DNA. A typical virus DNA preparation contains three fractions, namely linear DNA and circular DNA, each composed of about 320 kilobase pairs, as well as DNA fragments, 10 to 60 kilobase pairs in size. The large linear and the circular DNA contain single-stranded regions (average length: 2.9 kilobase). We propose that the native Ectocarpus virus genome is a circular DNA molecule whose double strand is interrupted by single-stranded regions. During the preparation procedure, the DNA circles tend to break at the single-stranded sites producing large linear as well as fragmented DNA. https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/8460486\/<\/p>\n\n\n\n January 25, 2022 https:\/\/www.ronjohnson.senate.gov\/2022\/1\/video-release-sen-ron-johnson-covid-19-a-second-opinion-panel-garners-over-800-000-views-in-24-hours<\/p>\n\n\n\n Click here<\/a> for the video. <\/strong>https:\/\/www.ronjohnson.senate.gov\/2022\/1\/video-release-sen-ron-johnson-covid-19-a-second-opinion-panel-garners-over-800-000-views-in-24-hours<\/p>\n\n\n\n OSHKOSH <\/strong>\u2014 On Monday, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) held a panel discussion with a group of world renowned doctors and medical experts to provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sen. Ron Johnson<\/strong> said: \u201cI’m hoping everybody that viewed this today recognizes the qualifications of the individuals that spoke here today. Now, again, there’s disagreement between people in this room. The viewpoints expressed are those of those individuals expressing it. But these are real world experiences from people that are on the front lines, that are treating patients. It\u2019s different from probably anything you’ve heard, unless you’ve been following these people in the media, trying to break through, trying to convey to the American public and provide the information that I think we all need, that we all deserve. Now, you know, my antenna is always up because I’m getting accused of spreading this misinformation all the time. So I can imagine how the news media is going to treat so much of this. They’re going to pick little phrases out, and they’re going to pick it apart and they’re going to try and marginalize this entire event.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cAll I can ask, is the viewers to share this. Tell your friends, I know this is long. This is a five hour long panel, and we didn’t even scratch the surface of what we need to discuss. This shouldn’t have been necessary. As our information grew, as we became better and better educated, less ignorant about the Coronavirus, COVID, the COVID vaccines, this should have been made public every step along the way. But it wasn’t. So again, I’m just asking the viewing public to have an open mind. Respect these individuals who have paid a significant price professionally, reputationally. These are highly qualified individuals. They speak from experience. We’ve got to fix this problem. We can’t let this continue. We can’t let it happen in the future. So again, thank all of you for coming. Thank you for being doctors, for being nurses, for being academicians, for being medical researchers, and thank all of you for viewing this. Share this with your friends. God bless you all.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sen. Johnson also extended an invitation to the following agencies to hear firsthand from the medical professionals. All declined to participate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Watch the video here<\/a>. Watch the full roundtable here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Below you can download the MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19<\/strong>, for use by professionals, with detailed guidance on the timing of initiation along with the suggested initial doses and durations of each component medication. The protocol document is available for download in multiple languages (see below) \u2013 more translations are available here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Please also review our\u00a0\u00a0I-MASK+ Prevention & Early Outpatient Treatment Protocol for COVID-19<\/a>, which was developed for the prevention and early outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Both are physiologic-based combination treatment regimens developed by leaders in critical care medicine. All component medicines are FDA-approved, inexpensive, readily available and have been used for decades with well-established safety profiles.\u00a0In October 2020, we added\u00a0\u00a0ivermectin<\/a>\u00a0as a core medication\u00a0<\/strong>in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. https:\/\/covid19criticalcare.com\/covid-19-protocols\/math-plus-protocol\/<\/p>\n\n\n\n BitChute<\/strong> es un servicio de alojamiento de v\u00eddeos<\/a> que funciona mediante tecnolog\u00eda peer-to-peer<\/a>.1<\/a><\/sup>\u200bFue fundado como m\u00e9todo de evitar algunas de las reglas de contenido marcadas en plataformas como Youtube<\/a>, y algunos creadores de contenido que fueron bloqueados o cuyos canales fueron desmonetizados (impedidos de recibir beneficios por la inclusi\u00f3n de anuncios en sus v\u00eddeos) en Youtube han migrado a BitChute.1<\/a><\/sup>\u200b2<\/a><\/sup>\u200b<\/p>\n\n\n\n La plataforma se cre\u00f3 en\u00a02017<\/a>. En el lanzamiento, el sitio se describi\u00f3 a s\u00ed mismo como usando tecnolog\u00eda WebTorrent peer-to-peer. En noviembre de 2019,\u00a0The Daily Dot<\/a>\u00a0cuestion\u00f3 si el uso compartido de usuario final entre pares estaba realmente en uso.<\/p>\n\n\n\n January 31, 20221:16 AM GMT-5 Last Updated 3 days ago Americas Canada rally against vaccine mandates blocks Ottawa as Trump praises protest By Steve Scherer https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/world\/americas\/canada-protest-against-covid-vaccine-mandates-blocks-ottawa-second-day-2022-01-30\/ Letter to the The Honorable Lloyd J. … Leer m\u00e1s<\/a><\/p>\n
On January 24, 2022, I held a roundtable featuring world renowned doctors and medical experts who shared their perspectives on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety and the overall response to the pandemic.1 At that roundtable, I heard testimony from Thomas Renz, an attorney who is representing three Department of Defense (DoD) histleblowers, who revealed disturbing information regarding dramatic increases in medical diagnoses among military personnel. The concern is that these increases may be related to the COVID-19 vaccines that our servicemen and women have been mandated to take. Based on data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), Renz reported that these whistleblowers found a significant increase in registered diagnoses on DMED for miscarriages, cancer, and many other medical conditions in 2021 compared to a five-year average from 2016-2020.2 For example, at the roundtable Renz stated that registered diagnoses for neurological issues increased 10 times from a five-year average of 82,000 to 863,000 in 2021.3 There were also increases in registered diagnoses in 2021 for the following medical conditions:4
\uf0b7 Hypertension \u2013 2,181% increase
\uf0b7 Diseases of the nervous system \u2013 1,048% increase
\uf0b7 Malignant neoplasms of esophagus \u2013 894% increase
\uf0b7 Multiple sclerosis \u2013 680% increase
\uf0b7 Malignant neoplasms of digestive organs \u2013 624% increase
\uf0b7 Guillain-Barre syndrome \u2013 551% increase
\uf0b7 Breast cancer \u2013 487% increase
\uf0b7 Demyelinating \u2013 487% increase
\uf0b7 Malignant neoplasms of thyroid and other endocrine glands \u2013 474% increase<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(at 4:54:35). 3 Id. at 4:55:23. 4 Data on file with staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\uf0b7 Female infertility \u2013 472% increase
\uf0b7 Pulmonary embolism \u2013 468% increase
\uf0b7 Migraines \u2013 452% increase
\uf0b7 Ovarian dysfunction \u2013 437% increase
\uf0b7 Testicular cancer \u2013 369% increase
\uf0b7 Tachycardia \u2013 302% increase
Renz also informed me that some DMED data showing registered diagnoses of myocarditis had been removed from the database.5 Following the allegation that DMED data had been doctored, I immediately wrote to you on January 24 requesting that you preserve all
records referring, relating, or reported to DMED.6 I have yet to hear whether you have complied with this request. At the roundtable, Renz revealed the names of the brave whistleblowers who uncovered this information in DMED: Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long.7 Any retaliatory actions taken against these individuals will not be tolerated and will be investigated immediately. In order to better understand what, if any awareness DoD has about COVID-19 vaccine injuries to service members, I request you provide the following information:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If so, please explain what actions DoD has taken to investigate the root cause for the increases in these diagnoses.<\/li>
Please provide this information as soon as possible but no later than February 15, 2022.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n
Ron Johnson Ranking Member Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(at 4:52:54). 6 Letter from Ron Johnson, Ranking Member, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, to Lloyd Austin, Secretary, Dep\u2019t of Defense, Jan. 24, 2022. 7 COVID-19: A Second Opinion, Rumble, Jan. 22, 2022, https:\/\/rumble.com\/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
(at 4:54:38).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Page 3 cc: The Honorable Jon Ossoff Chairman Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations https:\/\/roar-assets-auto.rbl.ms\/documents\/13712\/2022-02-01%20RHJ%20letter%20to%20DoD%20re%20DMED.pdf<\/a> https:\/\/www.ronjohnson.senate.gov\/services\/files\/FB6DDD42-4755-4FDC-BEE9-50E402911E02<\/p>\n\n\n\nHorowitz: Military spokesman claims 5 random years of DOD medical surveillance system were plagued by a giant glitch<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Either way, this is an enormous story that either demonstrates there are serious problems with the vaccines in the civilian world as well or that there is something wrong with the health of many service members. For some reason, there doesn\u2019t seem to be much interest in finding out what is<\/em> the problem other than to exonerate the sacred shots. https:\/\/roar-assets-auto.rbl.ms\/documents\/13635\/DMED%20fact%20sheet_final.pdf<\/p>\n\n\n\nHorowitz: Whistleblowers share DOD medical data that blows vaccine safety debate wide open<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Vaccine after effects more common in those who already had COVID<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/assets-global.website-files.com\/5e3d471e8cf4751833faf0f9\/61de9107389b4e23d5ba6f65_info.svg\")
This article has not been updated recently<\/p>\n\n\n\nVIDEO RELEASE Sen. Ron Johnson COVID-19: A Second Opinion Panel Garners Over 800,000 Views in 24 Hours<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
![\"FLCCC-Protocol-Logo-MATH-plus\"](\"https:\/\/covid19criticalcare.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/FLCCC-Protocol-Logo-MATH-plus.svg\" "\\"FLCCC-Protocol-Logo-MATH-plus\\"\/"){kind=logo}
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n