{"id":7069,"date":"2022-02-09T19:46:42","date_gmt":"2022-02-10T00:46:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/?p=7069"},"modified":"2022-02-09T19:46:43","modified_gmt":"2022-02-10T00:46:43","slug":"arnm-vaccines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/2022\/02\/09\/arnm-vaccines\/","title":{"rendered":"ARNm vaccines"},"content":{"rendered":"\nEl Dr. Anthony Fauci, los funcionarios de Salud y Servicios Humanos y otros expertos, incluyendo al Dr. Rick Bright, exdirector de la Autoridad de Investigaci\u00f3n y Desarrollo Biom\u00e9dico Avanzado de Estados Unidos (BARDA por sus siglas en ingl\u00e9s), ahora vicepresidente s\u00e9nior del \u00e1rea para prevenir y responder a las pandemias de la Fundaci\u00f3n Rockefeller, participaron en un panel organizado por el Instituto Milken, que se llev\u00f3 a cabo del 28 al 30 de octubre de 2019, para discutir c\u00f3mo podr\u00edan lograr el cambio del desarrollo de vacunas convencionales a la nueva tecnolog\u00eda de ARNm.1\n\n\n\nFauci And Others Openly Discuss Their Intent to Enforce A mRNA Type Flu Vaccine \u2013 In&nbsp;2019\n\n\n\nBY&nbsp;RHODA WILSON&nbsp;ON&nbsp;OCTOBER 7, 2021&nbsp;\u2022 Listen Now An explosive video of Fauci with Health and Human Services (\u201cHHS\u201d) officials and other health experts discussing how to enforce a mRNA-based universal flu vaccine is circulating on social media.&nbsp; The video clip is taken from a forum hosted by the Milken Institute in October 2019.&nbsp; Panellists include Anthony Fauci, Michael Specter and Rick Bright. \n\n\n\nMichael Specter&nbsp;is a journalist who has been a staff writer at The New Yorker since 1998.\n\n\n\nAnthony Fauci&nbsp;requires no introduction.&nbsp; His role in the current pandemic is widely publicised from:&nbsp;directing National Institutes of Health (\u201cNIH\u201d) funding&nb<span class=\"maquina-leer-mas\">[...x]<\/span><div id=\"premium-content-gate\" style=\"display:none;\" class=\"contenido-premium\">sp;to gain-of-function research on coronaviruses;&nbsp;ignoring hydroxychloroquine&nbsp;(\u201cHCQ\u201d) as a treatment for Covid; issuing diktats such as&nbsp;\u201cforget freedom\u201d and make Covid injections mandatory; the injection fraud that is the \u201cCovid vaccine\u201d; to, the part he has played in the coronavirus&nbsp;criminal conspiracy and racketeering enterprise&nbsp;which began in 1999 and has culminated in the current pandemic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dr. Rick Bright, formerly a director of the US Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (\u201cBARDA\u201d), was&nbsp;ousted in March \/April 2020 by the Trump administration&nbsp;after filing a whistle-blower complaint about the HHS\u2019s promotion of HCQ as a treatment for Covid.&nbsp; According to Dr. Vladimir Zelenko,&nbsp;Bright blocked access to HCQ&nbsp;and \u201cthis obstruction to life-saving medication was a death sentence for over 500,000 Americans.\u201d&nbsp; In March 2021,&nbsp;Bright joined The Rockefeller Foundation&nbsp;as Senior Vice President of Pandemic Prevention and Response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the \u2018Universal Flu Vaccine\u2019 forum in 2019, Bright said \u201cthere may be a need, even an urgent call, for an entity of excitement out there which is completely disruptive, not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes\u201d and Fauci agreed.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bright also said: \u201cit is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that and beam it to a number of regional centres, if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch to be self-administered.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Universal Flu Vaccine, Washington D.C., 28 \u2013 30 October 2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The clip above was taken from a forum hosted by the&nbsp;Milken Institute.&nbsp; You can watch the full forum\u2019s discussion&nbsp;HERE&nbsp;on C-Span or&nbsp;HERE&nbsp;on Bitchute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"the-milken-institute\"><strong>The Milken Institute<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The&nbsp;Milken Institute (\u201cMI\u201d)&nbsp;is an economic think tank based in California. It publishes research and hosts conferences that apply market-based principles and financial innovations to social issues.&nbsp; Its&nbsp;strategic partners&nbsp;include the usual suspects such as various financial institutions and The Rockefeller Foundation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MI was founded in 1991 by its chairman&nbsp;Michael Milken.&nbsp;&nbsp;In 1990 Milken was convicted&nbsp;of securities fraud and last year was given a pardon by President Trump. The White House statement called the charges against Milken \u2013 of which there were originally 98 \u2014 \u201ctruly novel.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Like the World Economic Forum (\u201cWEF\u201d), MI has annual Global Conferences which have been called \u201cDavos with Palm Trees.\u201d&nbsp; And like WEF\u2019s Young Global Leaders, MI has their Young Leaders Circle.&nbsp; Another similarity is that both receive money from the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation (\u201cBMGF\u201d).&nbsp; BMGF has granted&nbsp;US$3,3 million to WEF&nbsp;and US$4,4 million to MI over the last couple of decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MI, like WEF, seems to be pressing a \u2018sustainability\u2019 message and although there are a number of similarities between the two organisations there are also some differences.&nbsp; One significant difference being the price of admission.&nbsp; In 2014 Milken was US$8,500 \u2013 US$12,500 while Davos was US$87,000.&nbsp; And, the participants of MI\u2019s Global Conference are more hardcore finance, while Davos\u2019 are more government-centric.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Apart from the obvious BMGF common connection, there are visible direct links between MI and WEF.&nbsp; For example, a&nbsp;search for \u201cMilken Institute\u201d on WEF\u2019s website&nbsp;returns 163 results between 2012 and 2021, and MI is one of 10 named core collaborators on WEF\u2019s \u2018Global Standards Mapping Initiative: An overview of blockchain technical standards\u2019.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"universal-flu-vaccine-links-with-the-oxford-astrazeneca-covid-injection\"><strong>Universal Flu Vaccine Links with the Oxford\/AstraZeneca Covid Injection<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>University of Oxford\u2019s Sarah Gilbert and Adrian Hill&nbsp;created Vaccitech in 2016&nbsp;and it is Vaccitech which holds the&nbsp;patents and royalty rights for AstraZeneca\u2019s&nbsp;Covid injection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prior to Covid, Vaccitech\u2019s main focus, especially in 2019, was the&nbsp;development of a universal vaccine for the flu. To fully finance Hill and Gilbert\u2019s Vaccitech, and specifically its quest to develop a universal flu vaccine, Oxford Science Innovations sought \u00a3600 million from \u201coutside investors,\u201d chief among them the Wellcome Trust and the&nbsp;venture-capital arm of Google, Google Ventures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the same time, BMGF was also funding research to develop a universal flu vaccine.&nbsp; The BMGF effort originally partnered with Google\u2019s co-founder Larry Page and his wife Lucy. &nbsp;&nbsp;But, in 2017, BMGF joined forces with governmental and non-governmental organizations to form the&nbsp;Global Funders Consortium for Universal Influenza Vaccine Development&nbsp;to \u201csupport the creation of a universal influenza vaccine.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2018, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (\u201cNIAID\u201d) unveiled a strategic plan for research efforts and a&nbsp;bill was introduced by several US senators&nbsp;calling for $1 billion over the following five years for development of a universal flu vaccine. By this time, as indicated above, both BMGF and Page\u2019s&nbsp;Alphabet&nbsp;(Google) were already involved, having put down money for private developers CureVac and Vaccitech, respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2019, Fauci, Director of NIAID \u2013 NIAID being one of the 27 institutes and centres that make up the NIH \u2013 was a panellist at the MI\u2019s forum discussing, or rather promoting, a universal flu vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"explosive-video-emerges-of-fauci-and-hhs-officials-plotting-for-a-new-avian-flu-virus-to-enforce-universal-flu-vaccination-video\">EXPLOSIVE VIDEO Emerges of Fauci and HHS Officials Plotting for \u2018A New Avian Flu Virus\u2019 to Enforce Universal Flu Vaccination (VIDEO)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>By&nbsp;Jim Hoft Published October 6, 2021 at 8:15am <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here\u2019s the transcript:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><strong>Michael Specter:<\/strong>&nbsp;Why don\u2019t we blow the system up? I mean obviously, we can\u2019t just turn off the spigot on the system. We have and then say, hey everyone in the world should get this new vaccine that we haven\u2019t given to anyone yet. But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in 1947.<\/p><p><strong>Fauci:<\/strong>&nbsp;In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried-and-true egg growing which we know gives us results that can be beneficial, I mean we\u2019ve done well with that. There must be something that has to be much better. You have to prove that this works and then you\u2019ve got to go through all of the clinical trials: phase 1, phase 2, phase 3, and then show that this particular product is going to be good over a period of years. That alone, if it works perfectly, it\u2019s going to take a decade.<\/p><p><strong>Bright:<\/strong>&nbsp;There might be a need or even an urgent call for an entity of excitement out there that\u2019s completely disruptive, that\u2019s not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes.<\/p><p><strong>Fauci:<\/strong>&nbsp;So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza and it\u2019s going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don\u2019t care what your perception is, we\u2019re going to address the problem in a disruptive and in an iterative way because she does need both.<\/p><p><strong>Bright:<\/strong>&nbsp;But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that.. to a number of regional centers if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch of self-administer.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"monday-night-emergency-broadcast-video-emerges-of-fauci-and-hhs-plotting-to-stage-massive-health-scare-using-new-virus\"><strong>Monday Night Emergency Broadcast: Video Emerges of Fauci and HHS Plotting TO Stage Massive Health Scare Using &#8220;New Virus&#8221;<\/strong> 1,736,722&nbsp;views \u00b7 Oct 4, 2021 <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En la actualidad, parece que entre 64 600 y 407 400 personas en Estados Unidos han perdido la vida a causa de estas vacunas (utilizando un factor de subregistro de 6.5, como sugieren los CDC,<sup>2<\/sup>&nbsp;o un factor de 41, seg\u00fan los c\u00e1lculos de Steve Kirsch, director ejecutivo del&nbsp;<em>COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund<\/em>), y eso es en un solo a\u00f1o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"icymi-cdc-just-published-a-paper-that-admits-that-vaers-is-underreported-by-at-least-6-5x\">ICYMI: CDC just published a paper that admits that VAERS is underreported by at least 6.5X<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"this-was-easy-to-miss-since-it-wasn-t-specifically-called-out-but-a-cdc-paper-published-a-week-ago-confirmed-once-again-that-vaers-is-very-underreported-even-when-people-are-urged-to-report-by-hhs\">This was easy to miss since it wasn&#8217;t specifically called out, but a CDC paper published a week ago confirmed (once again) that VAERS is very underreported, even when people are urged to report by HHS Steve Kirsch Jan 6 372220 It\u2019s hard to keep up with all the data coming out of the CDC, but I try my best. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And sometimes, you strike gold every now and then.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Here\u2019s one such paper that was brought to my attention by Dr. David Wiseman. It was written by authors from the CDC and FDA. So you can trust it:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Children Aged 5\u201311 Years \u2014 United States, November 3\u2013December 19, 2021<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now look carefully at the second paragraph in the \u201cReview of V-Safe data\u201d section:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>Approximately 5.1% of parents reported that their child was unable to perform normal daily activities on the day after receipt of dose 1, and 7.4% after receipt of dose 2. Approximately 1% of parents reported seeking medical care in the week after vaccination; most medical care was received via a clinic appointment (441; 0.6%).&nbsp;<strong>Fourteen (0.02%) children reportedly received care at a hospital<\/strong>; information regarding reason for hospitalization was available for five children and included appendicitis (two), vomiting and dehydration (one), respiratory infection (one), and retropharyngeal cellulitis (one).&nbsp;<strong>Parents and guardians of all hospitalized children were contacted; two parents completed VAERS reports<\/strong>, and one revealed hospitalization was reported in error.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>In short, 13 child hospitalizations (since one of the 14 was a mistake), yet only 2 VAERS reports were filed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is stunning is that&nbsp;<strong>even after the parents were expressly asked<\/strong>&nbsp;by HHS to report to VAERS, only 2 complied with the advice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of course, these are relatively small numbers, but it is evidence that even in a best case scenario, VAERS is likely to be underreported by at least 6.5. So we know they know. They just don\u2019t want to admit it. Ever. Not even in the same paper! They just say at the end that VAERs is underreported and V-Safe is voluntary. They don\u2019t quantify it for you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"covid-19-vaccine-safety-in-children-aged-5-11-years-united-states-november-3-december-19-2021\">COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Children Aged 5\u201311 Years \u2014 United States, November 3\u2013December 19, 2021<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Weekly<\/em>&nbsp;\/ December 31, 2021 \/ 70(5152);1755\u20131760<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Anne M. Hause, PhD<sup>1<\/sup>; James Baggs, PhD<sup>1<\/sup>; Paige Marquez, MSPH<sup>1<\/sup>; Tanya R. Myers, PhD<sup>1<\/sup>; Julianne Gee, MPH<sup>1<\/sup>; John R. Su, MD, PhD<sup>1<\/sup>; Bicheng Zhang, MS<sup>1<\/sup>; Deborah Thompson, MD<sup>2<\/sup>; Tom T. Shimabukuro, MD<sup>1<\/sup>; David K. Shay, MD<sup>1<\/sup>&nbsp;(View author affiliations)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>During November 3\u2013December 19, 2021, v-safe enrolled 42,504 children aged 5\u201311 years who received Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (Table 3); second dose information was available for 29,899 (70.3%) of these children. During the week after receipt of dose 1, local (23,290; 54.8%) and systemic (14,734; 34.7%) reactions were frequently reported; systemic reactions were more frequently reported during the week after dose 2 (12,223; 40.9%) than dose 1. Reactions were reported most frequently on the day after vaccination for both doses. The most frequently reported reactions after either dose were injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. Fever was more frequently reported after dose 2 (4,001; 13.4%) than dose 1 (3,350; 7.9%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Approximately 5.1% of parents reported that their child was unable to perform normal daily activities on the day after receipt of dose 1, and 7.4% after receipt of dose 2. Approximately 1% of parents reported seeking medical care in the week after vaccination; most medical care was received via a clinic appointment (441; 0.6%). Fourteen (0.02%) children reportedly received care at a hospital; information regarding reason for hospitalization was available for five children and included appendicitis (two), vomiting and dehydration (one), respiratory infection (one), and retropharyngeal cellulitis (one). Parents and guardians of all hospitalized children were contacted; two parents completed VAERS reports, and one revealed hospitalization was reported in error. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En un art\u00edculo del 14 de enero de 2022 en el diario&nbsp;<em>The Japan Times<\/em>,<sup>3<\/sup>&nbsp;Brahma Chellaney, profesor de estudios estrat\u00e9gicos en el Centro de Investigaci\u00f3n de Pol\u00edticas de Delhi, destac\u00f3 la necesidad de identificar los errores que ocurrieron durante la pandemia de COVID, y para ello debemos investigar lo que sucedi\u00f3 en China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><em>\u201cSi queremos prevenir otra pandemia de coronavirus en el siglo XXI, es obligatorio comprender las causas de la actual\u201d,<\/em>&nbsp;escribe Chellaney.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><em>\u201cEl COVID-19 ha causado m\u00e1s de 5.4 millones de muertes. Pero eso es solo el comienzo, la cantidad de v\u00edctimas de la pandemia incluye tasas mayores de obesidad, desempleo, pobreza, depresi\u00f3n, alcoholismo, homicidio, violencia dom\u00e9stica, divorcio y suicidio.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><em>Y a medida que la variante \u00f3micron alimenta las tasas de infecci\u00f3n y perturba la econom\u00eda en muchas partes del mundo, la fatiga pand\u00e9mica se transform\u00f3 en una impotencia.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><em>Nuestras posibilidades de eliminar el COVID-19 cada vez parecen m\u00e1s lejanas. Pero mientras intentamos descubrir c\u00f3mo vivir con el virus, tambi\u00e9n debemos identificar los errores y accidentes que nos trajeron hasta aqu\u00ed. Y eso significa analizar de manera juiciosa a China\u201d.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"the-great-covid-19-coverup\">The great COVID-19 coverup<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"to-eliminate-the-virus-past-missteps-need-to-be-identified-that-means-looking-at-china\">To eliminate the virus, past missteps need to be identified \u2014 that means looking at China China has embraced obfuscation rather than transparency as the world tries to determine if COVID-19 emerged naturally in wildlife or was leaked from a lab. | REUTERS BY&nbsp;BRAHMA CHELLANEY PROJECT SYNDICATE Jan 14, 2022   <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En los primeros d\u00edas del brote inicial en Wuhan, China, el r\u00e9gimen chino neg\u00f3 cualquier evidencia de transmisi\u00f3n de persona a persona, una mentira que despu\u00e9s repiti\u00f3 la Organizaci\u00f3n Mundial de la Salud en un tuit del 14 de enero de 2020.<sup>4<\/sup>&nbsp;Menos de dos meses despu\u00e9s, la OMS declar\u00f3 al COVID-19 como una pandemia mundial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CORONAVIRUS<strong> Published<\/strong>&nbsp;March 18, 2020 <strong>WHO haunted by January tweet saying China found no human transmission of coronavirus<\/strong> By&nbsp;Nick Givas| Fox News <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>De acuerdo con el diario&nbsp;<em>South China Morning Post<\/em>,<sup>5<\/sup>&nbsp;el gobierno chino ten\u00eda claro que el virus se propagaba entre las personas. Los registros del gobierno vistos por el&nbsp;<em>South China Morning Post<\/em>&nbsp;rastrearon el primer caso conocido de COVID hasta mediados de noviembre de 2019, y a partir de entonces se reportaron de uno a cinco casos por d\u00eda. Sin duda la transmisi\u00f3n estaba ocurriendo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"exclusive-coronavirus-china-s-first-confirmed-covid-19-case-traced-back-to-november-17\">Exclusive |&nbsp;Coronavirus: China\u2019s first confirmed Covid-19 case traced back to November 17<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"government-records-suggest-first-person-infected-with-new-disease-may-have-been-a-hubei-resident-aged-55-but-patient-zero-has-yet-to-be-confirmeddocuments-seen-by-the-post-could-help-scientists-track-the-spread-of-the-disease-and-perhaps-determine-its-source\">Government records suggest first person infected with new disease may have been a Hubei resident aged 55, but \u2018patient zero\u2019 has yet to be confirmedDocuments seen by the Post could help scientists track the spread of the disease and perhaps determine its source <strong>Josephine Ma<\/strong> Published: 8:00am, 13 Mar, 2020 <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Al negar la probabilidad de transmisi\u00f3n de persona a persona, el gobierno chino y la OMS permitieron que el virus se propagara a trav\u00e9s de las fronteras internacionales durante varias semanas. China tambi\u00e9n expuls\u00f3 a todos los periodistas de Estados Unidos, lo que provoc\u00f3 este tuit del 18 de marzo de 2020, de un reportero de&nbsp;<em>Axios<\/em>, Jonathan Swan:<sup>6<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><em>&#8220;Terrible. Necesitamos reportes precisos de China con urgencia. La pandemia se origin\u00f3 en Wuhan y en un principio se encubri\u00f3 por las autoridades chinas. Un estudio de la Universidad de Southampton descubri\u00f3 que pudo haber existido una REDUCCI\u00d3N del 95 % en los casos y menos propagaci\u00f3n si Beijing hubiera intervenido 3 semanas antes\u201d.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>De hecho, las autoridades en Estados Unidos se han enfocado en proteger a China de las consecuencias. Por ejemplo, en febrero de 2020, cient\u00edficos de Estados Unidos relacionados con los Institutos Nacionales de Alergias y Enfermedades Infecciosas (NIAID) y los Institutos Nacionales de Salud, publicaron una &#8220;declaraci\u00f3n de consenso&#8221; en la revista&nbsp;<em>The Lancet<\/em>, en la que &#8220;condenaron de manera en\u00e9rgica&#8221; la &#8220;teor\u00eda de la conspiraci\u00f3n&#8221; de que el virus fue creado por el hombre y que se filtr\u00f3 de un laboratorio.<sup>8<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CORRESPONDENCE|&nbsp;VOLUME 395, ISSUE 10226,&nbsp;E42-E43,&nbsp;MARCH 07, 2020<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"statement-in-support-of-the-scientists-public-health-professionals-and-medical-professionals-of-china-combatting-covid-19\">Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Charles Calisher Dennis Carroll Rita Colwell Ronald B Corley Peter Daszak Christian Drosten et al. Published:February 19, 2020DOI:(20)30418-9 (20)30418-9\/fulltext<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Despu\u00e9s, criticaron a Richard Horton, editor en jefe de la revista&nbsp;<em>The Lancet<\/em>, por su defensa y apoyo al r\u00e9gimen chino, y adem\u00e1s lo acusaron por usar la revista para perseguir causas pol\u00edticas y sofocar el debate cient\u00edfico.<sup>9<\/sup>&nbsp;La tendencia de&nbsp;<em>The Lancet<\/em>&nbsp;parece inconfundible en este caso.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En enero de 2021, 14 expertos mundiales enviaron una carta a&nbsp;<em>The Lancet<\/em>&nbsp;en la que argumentaban que \u201cel origen natural no est\u00e1 respaldado por argumentos concluyentes y que no se puede descartar un origen de laboratorio\u201d. Horton rechaz\u00f3 la presentaci\u00f3n y afirm\u00f3 que &#8220;no era una prioridad&#8221; para la revista.<sup>10<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"world-s-most-famous-medical-journal-the-lancet-is-accused-of-doing-china-s-dirty-work-by-denouncing-the-covid-lab-leak-theory-as-a-conspiracy-writes-ian-birrell\">World&#8217;s most famous medical journal The Lancet is accused of doing China&#8217;s dirty work &#8211; by denouncing the Covid lab leak theory as a conspiracy, writes IAN BIRRELL<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>By&nbsp;SPECIAL INVESTIGATION BY IAN BIRRELL FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY <strong>PUBLISHED:<\/strong>&nbsp;22:01 GMT, 26 June 2021&nbsp;|&nbsp;<strong>UPDATED:<\/strong>&nbsp;11:56 GMT, 27 June 2021  Earlier this year, the prominent German psychiatrist Thomas Schulze sent a proposal to Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of world-renowned medical journal The Lancet, suggesting they start a debate over the complicity of Chinese scientists in the persecution of Uighurs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En lo que parece haber sido un acto de reciprocidad ben\u00e9fica para sus aliados de Estados Unidos, en marzo de 2021, el WIV elimin\u00f3 de su sitio web las menciones de su colaboraci\u00f3n con el NIAID\/NIH y otros socios de investigaci\u00f3n de Estados Unidos, luego de que los miembros del Senado comenzaran a interrogar al Dr. Fauci sobre la forma en que financi\u00f3 la investigaci\u00f3n de ganancia de funci\u00f3n en el WIV.<sup>11<\/sup>&nbsp;Tambi\u00e9n eliminaron un art\u00edculo cient\u00edfico que hablaba sobre la investigaci\u00f3n gen\u00e9tica del virus del SARS.<sup>12<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"here-we-go-again-rand-paul-clashes-with-fauci-for-the-4th-time\">&#8216;Here we go again&#8217;: Rand Paul clashes with Fauci (for the 4th time)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Yesterday was the fourth time Rand Paul clashed with Anthony Fauci during a hearing. If the senator thinks these exchanges help him, he&#8217;s wrong. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"will-sars-come-back\">Will SARS come back<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>2015-12-04 |&nbsp;AAA&nbsp;&nbsp;[print][close]  The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV underscores the threat of cross-species transmission events leading to outbreaks in humans.&nbsp;Recently, Prof. Zhengli Shi and Xingyi Ge from WIV, in cooperation with researchers from University of North Carolina, Harvard Medical School, Bellinzona Institute of Microbiology and etc, examine the disease potential of a SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV, which is currently circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations. Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system, the scientists generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV. Evaluation of available SARS-based immune-therapeutic and prophylactic modalities revealed poor efficacy; both monoclonal antibody and vaccine approaches failed to neutralize and protect from infection with CoVs using the novel spike protein.&nbsp;On the basis of these findings, they synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. The work suggests a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mencion\u00e9 por primera vez que el brote ten\u00eda las caracter\u00edsticas de una fuga de laboratorio en un art\u00edculo del 4 de febrero de 2020. Un informe de evaluaci\u00f3n de la Agencia de Inteligencia de Defensa de Estados Unidos del 27 de marzo de 2020, se\u00f1al\u00f3 que tal vez el SARS-CoV-2 se liber\u00f3 de forma accidental de un laboratorio de enfermedades infecciosas.<sup>13<\/sup>&nbsp;Sin embargo, esto ocurri\u00f3 un a\u00f1o antes de que los principales medios de comunicaci\u00f3n dejaran de descartar la evidencia.<sup>14,15<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"the-controversial-experiments-and-wuhan-lab-suspected-of-starting-the-coronavirus-pandemic\">The Controversial Experiments and Wuhan Lab Suspected of Starting the Coronavirus Pandemic<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>BY&nbsp;<strong>FRED GUTERL&nbsp;,&nbsp;NAVEED JAMALI&nbsp;AND&nbsp;TOM O&#8217;CONNOR&nbsp;<\/strong>ON 4\/27\/20 AT 3:34 PM EDT <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"in-2018-diplomats-warned-of-risky-coronavirus-experiments-in-a-wuhan-lab-no-one-listened\">In 2018, Diplomats Warned of Risky Coronavirus Experiments in a Wuhan Lab. No One Listened.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>After seeing a risky lab, they wrote a cable warning to Washington. But it was ignored. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"link-37279364\">Some Scientists Question W.H.O. Inquiry Into the Coronavirus Pandemic\u2019s Origins<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Those who still suspect the outbreak in China may have been caused by a lab leak or accident are pressing for an independent investigation.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>La comisi\u00f3n de la OMS encargada de la investigaci\u00f3n del origen del SARS-CoV-2 tambi\u00e9n descart\u00f3 la teor\u00eda del origen de laboratorio sin realizar una investigaci\u00f3n real.<sup>16,17<\/sup>&nbsp;Sin embargo, la reacci\u00f3n violenta y la incredulidad fue tan grande que<sup>18<\/sup>&nbsp;el director general de la OMS, Tedros Ghebreyesus, se retract\u00f3 y prometi\u00f3 que se investigar\u00eda m\u00e1s a fondo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>After Wuhan mission on pandemic origins, WHO team dismisses lab leak theory<\/strong> A worker walks outside the Wuhan Central Hospital on Saturday. (Ng Han Guan\/AP)By&nbsp;Gerry Shih&nbsp;and&nbsp;Emily Rauhala&nbsp;February 9, 2021 <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After Wuhan mission on pandemic origins, WHO team dismisses lab leak theory  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OPEN LETTER<br>Call for a Full and Unrestricted<br>International Forensic Investigation into the<br>Origins of COVID-19<br>March 4, 2021<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Introduction<br>Finding the origins of SARS-CoV-2 is critically important to both better addressing the current pandemic and reducing the risks of future ones. Unfortunately, well over a year after the initial outbreak the origins of the pandemic remain unknown.<br>As scientists, social scientists, and science communicators who have been independently and collectively looking into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe it essential that all hypotheses about the origins of the pandemic be thoroughly examined and full access to all necessary resources be provided without regard to political or other sensitivities.<br>Based on our analysis, and as confirmed by the global study convened by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Chinese authorities, there is as yet no evidence demonstrating a fully natural origin of this virus. The zoonosis hypothesis, largely based on patterns of previous zoonosis events, is only one of a number of possible SARS-CoV-2 origins, alongside the research-related accident hypothesis.<br>Although the \u201ccollaborative\u201d process of discovery mandated by the World Health Assembly in May 2020 was meant to enable a full examination of the origins of the pandemic, we believe that structural limitations built into this endeavor make it all but impossible for the WHO-convened mission to realize this aspiration.<br>In particular, we wish to raise public awareness of the fact that half of the joint team convened under that process is made of Chinese citizens whose scientific independence may be limited, that international members of the joint team had to rely on information the Chinese authorities chose to share with them, and that any joint team report must be approved by both the Chinese and international members of the joint team.<br>We have therefore reached the conclusion that the joint team did not have the mandate, the independence, or the necessary accesses to carry out a full and unrestricted investigation into all the relevant SARS-CoV-2 origin hypotheses &#8211; whether natural spillover or laboratory\/researchrelated incident.<br>We are also concerned that the joint team\u2019s work has been inaccurately reported by the media as an independent investigation whose conclusions reflect those of the WHO. The February 9, 2021<br>Wuhan joint press conference was a good example of this misunderstanding. Although the findings were those of the joint team, they were widely reported as representing the WHO itself.<br>As strong supporters of the WHO and its mission, we believe it must be made clear that any findings of the joint committee, while potentially useful to a limited extent, represent neither the official position of the WHO nor the result of an unrestricted, independent investigation.<br>For this reason, we believe it is essential that the contours of a full and unrestricted investigation be outlined to set a standard against which current and future efforts can be evaluated. (1).pdf<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En marzo de 2021 publiqu\u00e9 un art\u00edculo<sup>20<\/sup>&nbsp;que presenta el trabajo del Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, un m\u00e9dico general en Cheshire, Inglaterra, quien se propuso a equilibrar el alarmismo que ocurre a manos de la atenci\u00f3n m\u00e9dica y los medios de comunicaci\u00f3n, en especial en los \u00faltimos dos a\u00f1os. Puede&nbsp;leerlo aqu\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"top-eight-covid-lies-dr-malcolm-kendrick-via-dr-mercola\">Top Eight Covid lies \u2013 Dr Malcolm Kendrick via Dr Mercola<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>by&nbsp;Editor&nbsp;|&nbsp;Mar 22, 2021  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"expanderHead\">STORY AT-A-GLANCE<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, a general practitioner in Cheshire, England, has made it his mission to add some balance to the widespread fear-mongering that occurs at the hands of the health care lobby and media, including in regard to COVID-19<\/li><li>The top COVID lies include that there\u2019s no such thing as naturally acquired herd immunity and that vaccines induce stronger and longer lasting immunity than recovery from natural infection<\/li><li>COVID-19 death statistics are also misleading, and the universal mask mandates and lockdowns said to save lives are a farce<\/li><li>Other COVID lies include the myth of asymptomatic spreaders driving the pandemic and the \u201cofficial\u201d narrative that the virus didn\u2019t leak from a laboratory accident<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>1.No Such Thing as Herd Immunity \u2014 Except From Vaccines \u2014<\/strong>&nbsp;Herd immunity&nbsp;occurs when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease such that it can no longer spread widely in the community. When the number susceptible is low enough to prevent epidemic growth, herd immunity is said to have been reached. Prior to the introduction of vaccines, all herd immunity was achieved via exposure to and recovery from an infectious disease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Eventually, as vaccination became widespread, the concept of herd immunity evolved to include not only the naturally acquired immunity that comes from prior illness but also the temporary vaccine-acquired immunity that can occur after vaccination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the case of COVID-19, however, we\u2019ve been told that the idea of natural herd immunity to COVID-19 is not achievable \u2014 and even considering that it could be is \u201cdeadly and dangerous.\u201d<sup>2<\/sup>&nbsp;Yet, a curious thing happened. When vaccines became available, the idea of vaccine-induced herd immunity to COVID-19 became widespread. According to Kendrick:<sup>3<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><em>\u201cFirst, I was told that attempting to create herd immunity was not achievable. It would also be extremely dangerous and would inevitably result in many hundreds of thousands of excess deaths.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><em>Then the vaccines arrived at fantastical speed and I was told that mass vaccination, by creating herd immunity, would be the factor that would allow us to conquer COVID19 and return to normal life. I am not entirely sure which of these things is impossible, but one of them must be.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>5.The Swedish COVID-19 Response Was a Disaster \u2014<\/strong>&nbsp;Sweden&nbsp;handled the pandemic differently than most of the globe, and has been chided for its looser restrictions and lack of severe lockdowns. In October 2020, TIME called the Swedish COVID-19 response a \u201cdisaster,\u201d<sup>14<\/sup>&nbsp;but Kendrick cites data showing that the death rate in Sweden in 2020 was right in line with other years \u2014 nothing out of the ordinary.<sup>15<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When Kendrick compared the number of deaths in Sweden in 2012 \u2014 one of their highest death statistics \u2014 to 2020, the difference between absolute death rate in 2012 and 2020 is 0.012%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThat is 120 extra deaths per million of the population, which is 1,224 people in a population of 10.2 million. The statistics tell us that twelve thousand people died from COVID19 in Sweden. Maybe you can make all that add up. Frankly, I find it impossible.\u201d<sup>16<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>7.Asymptomatic Spreaders Are Driving the Pandemic \u2014<\/strong>&nbsp;The reasoning given for lockdowns, masks and social distancing is to stop the spread of disease among people who are asymptomatic. It\u2019s common sense to stay home if you\u2019re sick and exhibiting symptoms, but for people who feel healthy, the institution of lockdowns to prevent asymptomatic spread is unprecedented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yet, during a June 8, 2020, press briefing, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization\u2019s technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that&nbsp;asymptomatic transmission is very rare, meaning an individual who tests positive but does not exhibit symptoms is highly unlikely to transmit live virus to others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A study in Nature Communications also found \u201cthere was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts.\u201d<sup>20<\/sup>&nbsp;When they further tested asymptomatic patients for antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the 300, or 63.3%, had actually had a \u201chot\u201d or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies. Still, none of their contacts had been infected.<sup>21<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"about-dr-malcolm-kendrick\">About Dr. Malcolm&nbsp;Kendrick<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>I am a GP living in Macclesfield, having graduated from Aberdeen medical school many moons ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This blog is my best effort at providing some balance to the increasingly strident healthcare lobby that seems intent on scaring everyone about almost everything. Is there a foodstuff that is safe to eat anymore? Is there any activity that does not cause cancer or heart disease? <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OCTOBER 29, 2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"universal-flu-vaccine\">Universal Flu Vaccine<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Health experts discussed the scientific and technological prospects of an effective universal influenza vaccine. Speakers included Dr.&nbsp;Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and&nbsp;Margaret Hamburg, former FDA commissioner. Panelists discussed the need for more funding for research, better collaboration between the private and government sectors, advances in technology in flu research and the goal of a universal flu vaccine. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Por ejemplo, a finales de noviembre de 2020, las comunidades de personas jubiladas instalaron \u201cmuros de abrazos\u201d donde los visitantes pod\u00edan abrazar a sus seres queridos a trav\u00e9s de l\u00e1minas gruesas de pl\u00e1stico. La AARP report\u00f3<sup>21<\/sup>&nbsp;esto como un ingenioso invento para ayudar a los seres queridos a conectarse, pero, en realidad, est\u00e1n a un paso de la locura. \u00bfNadie pens\u00f3 que un virus en el aire podr\u00eda viajar por encima o por debajo de la cortina de pl\u00e1stico?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"retirement-community-s-hugging-wall-allows-for-touch-during-pandemic\">Retirement Community&#8217;s &#8216;Hugging Wall&#8217; Allows for Touch During Pandemic<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"a-little-inspiration-and-plastic-helps-loved-ones-connect-during-the-holidays\">A little inspiration \u2014 and plastic \u2014 helps loved ones connect during the holidays by Christina Ianzito,&nbsp;AARP, November 30, 2020 <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pas\u00f3 m\u00e1s de un a\u00f1o y medio antes de que los medios comenzaran a cuestionar la utilidad de estas barreras. En un art\u00edculo del New York Times del 19 de agosto de 2021,<sup>22<\/sup>&nbsp;Tara Parker-Pope destac\u00f3 la investigaci\u00f3n que sugiere que las barreras \u201cpueden interferir con la ventilaci\u00f3n normal\u201d y el flujo de aire,<sup>23<\/sup>&nbsp;lo que puede hacer que la propagaci\u00f3n viral sea m\u00e1s probable. Un estudio, realizado por los CDC descubri\u00f3 que las barreras no ten\u00edan ning\u00fan impacto en el riesgo de infecci\u00f3n,<sup>24<\/sup>&nbsp;y poco tiempo despu\u00e9s otro descubri\u00f3 que lo empeoraron.<sup>25<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"link-790189fc\">Those Anti-Covid Plastic Barriers Probably Don\u2019t Help and May Make Things Worse<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Clear barriers have sprung up at restaurants, nail salons and school classrooms, but most of the time, they do little to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Shields at a restaurant in Placerville, Calif., in May 2020. Research suggests that transparent barriers can interfere with normal ventilation.Credit&#8230;Rich Pedroncelli\/File, via Associated Press <strong>By&nbsp;Tara Parker-Pope<\/strong>Aug. 19, 2021  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Weekly SARS-CoV-2 screening of asymptomatic students and staff to guide and evaluate strategies for safer in-person learning<br>Shira Doron, MD*<br>Robin R. Ingalls, MD*<br>Anne Beauchamp, PhD<br>Jesse Boehm, PhD<br>Helen W. Boucher, MD<br>Linda H. Chow, MBA<br>Linda Corridan, M.Ed, BSN, RN<br>Katey Goehringer, MBA<br>Doug Golenbock, MD<br>Liz Larsen, MBA<br>David Lussier, Ed.D.<br>Marcia Testa, MPH, MPhil, PhD<br>Andrea Ciaranello, MD, MPH<br>*These authors contributed equally to this work. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"mask-use-and-ventilation-improvements-to-reduce-covid-19-incidence-in-elementary-schools-georgia-november-16-december-11-2020\">Mask Use and Ventilation Improvements to Reduce COVID-19 Incidence in Elementary Schools \u2014 Georgia, November 16\u2013December 11, 2020<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Weekly<\/em>&nbsp;\/ May 28, 2021 \/ 70(21);779\u2013784<em>On May 21, 2021, this report was posted online as an&nbsp;<\/em>MMWR&nbsp;<em>Early Release.<\/em>Jenna Gettings, DVM<sup>1,2,3<\/sup>; Michaila Czarnik, MPH<sup>1,4<\/sup>; Elana Morris, MPH<sup>1<\/sup>; Elizabeth Haller, MEd<sup>1<\/sup>; Angela M. Thompson-Paul, PhD<sup>1<\/sup>; Catherine Rasberry, PhD<sup>1<\/sup>; Tatiana M. Lanzieri, MD<sup>1<\/sup>; Jennifer Smith-Grant, MSPH<sup>1<\/sup>; Tiffiany Michelle Aholou, PhD<sup>1<\/sup>; Ebony Thomas, MPH<sup>2<\/sup>; Cherie Drenzek, DVM<sup>2<\/sup>; Duncan MacKellar, DrPH<sup>1<\/sup>&nbsp;(View author affiliations)  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"household-covid-19-risk-and-in-person-schooling\">Household COVID-19 risk and in-person schooling<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\" id=\"contrib-group-1\"><li><em>\ue901<\/em>View ORCID ProfileJustin Lessler<sup>1<\/sup>,*,&nbsp;<\/li><li><em>\ue901<\/em>View ORCID ProfileM. Kate Grabowski<sup>1<\/sup>,<sup>2<\/sup>,&nbsp;<\/li><li><em>\ue901<\/em>View ORCID ProfileKyra H. Grantz<sup>1<\/sup>,&nbsp;<\/li><li><em>\ue901<\/em>View ORCID ProfileElena Badillo-Goicoechea<sup>3<\/sup>,&nbsp;<\/li><li><em>\ue901<\/em>View ORCID ProfileC. Jessica E. Metcalf<sup>4<\/sup>,&nbsp;<\/li><li><em>\ue901<\/em>View ORCID ProfileCarly Lupton-Smith<sup>5<\/sup>,&nbsp;<\/li><li><em>\ue901<\/em>View ORCID ProfileAndrew S. Azman<sup>1<\/sup>,<sup>6<\/sup>,&nbsp;<\/li><li><em>\ue901<\/em>View ORCID ProfileElizabeth A. Stuart<sup>3<\/sup>,<sup>5<\/sup>,<sup>7<\/sup><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>+<\/strong>&nbsp;See all&nbsp;authors and affiliationsScience&nbsp;&nbsp;04 Jun 2021:<br>Vol. 372, Issue 6546, pp. 1092-1097<br>DOI: 10.1126\/science.abh2939 In-person schooling has proved contentious and difficult to study throughout the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Data from a massive online survey in the United States indicate an increased risk of COVID-19\u2013related outcomes among respondents living with a child attending school in person. School-based mitigation measures are associated with significant reductions in risk, particularly daily symptoms screens, teacher masking, and closure of extracurricular activities. A positive association between in-person schooling and COVID-19 outcomes persists at low levels of mitigation, but when seven or more mitigation measures are reported, a significant relationship is no longer observed. Among teachers, working outside the home was associated with an increase in COVID-19\u2013related outcomes, but this association is similar to that observed in other occupations (e.g., health care or office work). Although in-person schooling is associated with household COVID-19 risk, this risk can likely be controlled with properly implemented school-based mitigation measures.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Adem\u00e1s de todos los estudios que en a\u00f1os pasados demostraron que los cubrebocas no funcionan contra los virus, ahora podemos se\u00f1alar un informe del Departamento de Educaci\u00f3n del Reino Unido,<sup>26,<\/sup><sup>27<\/sup>&nbsp;que no encontr\u00f3 evidencia de que el uso de cubrebocas en las escuelas redujera las ausencias por enfermedad. Sarah Lewis, profesora de epidemiolog\u00eda molecular en la Universidad de Bristol, dijo para Bloomberg:<sup>28<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><em>\u201cLos mandatos del uso de cubrebocas pueden restar valor a la calidad de la educaci\u00f3n y excluir a los alumnos con dificultades auditivas de las discusiones. Cuando no hay suficiente evidencia de un beneficio de una pol\u00edtica y evidencia de da\u00f1os, el valor predeterminado no debe intervenir\u201d.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"u-k-study-fails-to-prove-masks-work-in-schools\">U.K. Study Fails to Prove Masks Work in Schools<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>By&nbsp;Irina Anghel&nbsp;+FollowJanuary 7, 2022, 9:50 AM UTC  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Aun as\u00ed, los investigadores que quieren que los cubrebocas sean la regla y no la excepci\u00f3n contin\u00faan realizando &#8220;estudios&#8221; que seg\u00fan prueban que todas las personas est\u00e1n mejor con la cara cubierta. Por ejemplo, un estudio que respalda el uso de cubrebocas<sup>29<\/sup>&nbsp;sali\u00f3 a la luz en enero de 2022 como parte de una iniciativa de la Fundaci\u00f3n Nacional de Ciencias para estudiar la transmisi\u00f3n de enfermedades en las aulas. El estudio consisti\u00f3 en solo 14 personas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"headline\">Face masks cut distance airborne pathogens could travel in half, new study finds<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Date:January 12, 2022Source:University of Central FloridaSummary:The effectiveness of face masks has been a hotly debated topic since the emergence of COVID-19. However, a new study offers more evidence that they work. Researchers found that face masks reduce the distance airborne pathogens could travel, when speaking or coughing, by more than half compared to not wearing a mask. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lo \u00fanico bueno de esta triste historia es que la venta de estos bloqueadores ineficaces de rasgos faciales, que implantaron las universidades y escuelas de Estados Unidos, recaudaron $ 12,000 para el fondo de becas de m\u00fasica de la Universidad Estatal de Nuevo M\u00e9xico a fines de agosto de 2020.<sup>30<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"nmsu-marching-band-creates-masks-with-opening-for-instruments\">NMSU marching band creates masks with opening for instruments<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>by:&nbsp;KRQE Staff Posted:&nbsp;Aug 6, 2020 \/ 10:24 PM MDT Updated:&nbsp;Aug 7, 2020 \/ 05:35 AM MDT <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8211;&nbsp;Fuentes y Referencias<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\" id=\"footnote-references2\"><li><sup>1<\/sup>&nbsp;Rights and Freedoms October 7, 2021<\/li><li><sup>2<\/sup>&nbsp;Steve Kirsch Substack January 6, 2022<\/li><li><sup>3,<\/sup>&nbsp;<sup>7,<\/sup>&nbsp;<sup>19<\/sup>&nbsp;The Japan Times January 14, 2022<\/li><li><sup>4,<\/sup>&nbsp;<sup>6<\/sup>&nbsp;Fox News March 18, 2020<\/li><li><sup>5<\/sup>&nbsp;South China Morning Post March 13, 2020<\/li><li><sup>8<\/sup>&nbsp;The Lancet February 19, 2020 DOI: 10.1016\/S0140-6736(20)30418-9<\/li><li><sup>9,<\/sup>&nbsp;<sup>10<\/sup>&nbsp;Daily Mail June 26, 2021, Updated June 27, 2021<\/li><li><sup>11<\/sup>&nbsp;MSNBC March 19, 2021<\/li><li><sup>12<\/sup>&nbsp;Web Archive WIV Will SARS Come Back? December 4, 2015<\/li><li><sup>13<\/sup>&nbsp;Newsweek April 27, 2020<\/li><li><sup>14<\/sup>&nbsp;Politico March 8, 2021<\/li><li><sup>15<\/sup>&nbsp;New York Times March 4, 2021 (Archived)<\/li><li><sup>16<\/sup>&nbsp;The Washington Post February 9, 2021<\/li><li><sup>17<\/sup>&nbsp;The Washington Post February 9, 2021 (Archived)<\/li><li><sup>18<\/sup>&nbsp;WSJ Open Letter, Call for Full and Unrestricted International Forensic Investigation Into the Origins of COVID-19, March 4, 2021 (PDF)<\/li><li><sup>20<\/sup>&nbsp;Covid-unmasked.net March 22, 2021<\/li><li><sup>21<\/sup>&nbsp;AARP November 30, 2020<\/li><li><sup>22<\/sup>&nbsp;New York Times August 19, 2021<\/li><li><sup>23<\/sup>&nbsp;MedRxiv March 20, 2021 DOI: 10.1101\/2021.03.20.21253976<\/li><li><sup>24<\/sup>&nbsp;CDC MMWR May 28, 2021; 70(21): 779-784<\/li><li><sup>25<\/sup>&nbsp;Science June 4, 2021; 372(6546): 1092-1097<\/li><li><sup>26<\/sup>&nbsp;Department of Education UK Evidence Summary January 2022<\/li><li><sup>27,<\/sup>&nbsp;<sup>28<\/sup>&nbsp;Bloomberg January 7, 2022<\/li><li><sup>29<\/sup>&nbsp;Science Daily January 12, 2022<\/li><li><sup>30<\/sup>&nbsp;KRQE August 6, 2020<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>READ History has been rewritten and buildings destroyed <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>READ <\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El Dr. Anthony Fauci, los funcionarios de Salud y Servicios Humanos y otros expertos, incluyendo al Dr. Rick Bright, exdirector de la Autoridad de Investigaci\u00f3n y Desarrollo Biom\u00e9dico Avanzado de Estados Unidos (BARDA por sus siglas en ingl\u00e9s), ahora vicepresidente s\u00e9nior del \u00e1rea para prevenir y responder a las pandemias de la Fundaci\u00f3n Rockefeller, participaron &#8230; <a title=\"ARNm vaccines\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/2022\/02\/09\/arnm-vaccines\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about ARNm vaccines\">Leer m\u00e1s<\/a><\/p>\n\n        <p class=\"social-share\">\n            <strong><span>Sharing is caring<\/span><\/strong> <!--<i class=\"fa fa-share-alt\"><\/i>&nbsp;&nbsp;-->\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fabudinen.com%2Fblog%2F2022%2F02%2F09%2Farnm-vaccines%2F\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"facebook\"><i class=\"fab fa-facebook\"><\/i> <span>Share<\/span><\/a>\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fabudinen.com%2Fblog%2F2022%2F02%2F09%2Farnm-vaccines%2F\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"gplus\"><i class=\"fab fa-google-plus\"><\/i> <span>+1<\/span><\/a>\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=ARNm%20vaccines&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fabudinen.com%2Fblog%2F2022%2F02%2F09%2Farnm-vaccines%2F&amp;via=YOUR_TWITTER_HANDLE_HERE\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"twitter\"><i class=\"fab fa-twitter\"><\/i> <span>Tweet<\/span><\/a>\n            <a href=\"http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=ARNm%20vaccines\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"linkedin\"><i class=\"fab fa-linkedin\"><\/i> <span>Share<\/span><\/a>\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/wa.me\/?text=ARNm%20vaccines https%3A%2F%2Fabudinen.com%2Fblog%2F2022%2F02%2F09%2Farnm-vaccines%2F\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"whatsapp\"><i class=\"fab fa-whatsapp\"><\/i> <span>Share<\/span><\/a>\n            <w>6537 words 135 views<\/w>\n        <\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sin-categoria"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7069"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7069\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7108,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7069\/revisions\/7108"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}