{"id":7499,"date":"2022-06-10T21:16:25","date_gmt":"2022-06-11T02:16:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/?p=7499"},"modified":"2022-06-10T21:17:57","modified_gmt":"2022-06-11T02:17:57","slug":"the-top-10-creepiest-and-most-dystopian-things-pushed-by-the-world-economic-forum-wef","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/2022\/06\/10\/the-top-10-creepiest-and-most-dystopian-things-pushed-by-the-world-economic-forum-wef\/","title":{"rendered":"The Top 10 Creepiest and Most Dystopian Things Pushed by the World Economic Forum (WEF)"},"content":{"rendered":"\nThe World Economic Forum (WEF) is one of the most powerful organizations in the world. And, throughout the years, people at the WEF have said some truly insane and dystopian things. And they\u2019ve managed to word these things in the creepiest ways possible. Here are the top 10 most insane things said by the WEF. \n\n\n\nPublished 1 week ago on June 1, 2022 By Vigilant Citizen\n\n\n\nWhen one talks about the \u201cglobal elite\u201d, one usually refers to a small group of wealthy and powerful individuals who operate beyond national borders. Through various organizations, these non-elected individuals gather in semi-secrecy to decide policies they want to see applied on a global level.\n\n\n\nThe World Economic Forum (WEF) is smack dab in the middle of it all. Indeed, through its annual Davos meetings, the WEF attempts to legitimize and normalize its influence on the world\u2019s democratic nations by having a panel of world leaders attending and speaking at the event.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nA simple look at the list of attendees at these meetings reveals the organization\u2019s incredible reach and influence. The biggest names in media, politics, business, science, technology, and finance are represented at the WEF.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 34 (out of 58) of the list of attendees at the 2022 Davos meeting. Big names, big companies, big influence.\n\n\n\nAccording to mass media, the Davos meetings gather people to discuss issues such as \u201cinequality, climate change, and international cooperation\u201d. This simplistic description appea[...x]<\/span>
rs to be custom-made to cause the average citizen to yawn in boredom. But topics at the WEF go much further than \u201cinequality\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Throughout the years, people at the WEF have said some highly disturbing things, none of which garnered proper media attention. In fact, when one pieces together the topics championed by the WEF, an overarching theme emerges: The total control of humanity using media, science, and technology while reshaping democracies to form a global government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If this sounds like a far-fetched conspiracy theory, keep reading. Here are the 10 most dystopian things that are being pushed by the WEF right now. This list sorted is in no particular order. Because they\u2019re all equally crazy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#10 Penetrating Governments<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The least one can say is that Klaus Schwab, the founder and the head of the WEF is not a fan of democracy. In fact, he perceives it as an obstacle to a fully globalized world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the 2010 WEF report titled \u201cGlobal Redesign\u201d, Schwab postulates that a globalized world is best managed by a \u201cself-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system), and select civil society organizations (CSOs)\u201d. This is the exact opposite of a democracy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He argued that governments are no longer \u201cthe overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage\u201d and that \u201cthe time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance\u201d. For this reason, the Transnational Institute (TNI) described the WEF as \u201ca silent global coup d\u2019\u00e9tat\u201d to capture governance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2017, at Harvard\u2019s John F. Kennedy School of Government, Schwab blatantly admitted what is continually dismissed as a \u201cconspiracy theory\u201d by mass media: The WEF is \u201cpenetrating\u201d governments around the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Head of the World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab at Harvard\u2019s John F. Kennedy School of Government in 2017:<\/p>

\u201cWhat we are very proud of, is that we penetrate the global cabinets of countries with our WEF Young Global Leaders\u2026 like Trudeau\u201dpic.twitter.com\/D6odR5mqI6<\/p>

\u2014 Maajid \u0623\u0628\u0648 \u0639\u0645\u0651\u0627\u0631 (@MaajidNawaz) January 25, 2022<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Schwab said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI have to say, when I mention now names, like Mrs. (Angela) Merkel and even Vladimir Putin, and so on, they all have been Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of now is the young generation, like Prime Minister [Justin] Trudeau, the President of Argentina and so on.<\/p>

We penetrate the cabinets. So yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet, are actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. (\u2026) It\u2019s true in Argentina and it\u2019s true in France, with the President \u2013 a Young Global Leader.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

In this outstanding talk, Schwab blatantly stated that Angela Merkel of Germany, Vladimir Putin of Russia, Justin Trudeau of Canada, and Emmanuel Macron of France were \u201cgroomed\u201d by the WEF. He even adds that at least half of Canada\u2019s cabinet consists of representatives sold to the WEF\u2019s agenda. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is the absolute truth, confirmed by the head of the WEF himself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#9 Controlling Minds Using Sound Waves<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In 2018, one of the topics of discussion at the WEF was \u201cMind Control Using Sound Waves\u201d (read my full article about it here). I did not alter this title for sensationalism, those are exactly the words used by the WEF.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the title of an actual article published on the WEF\u2019s official website. It was deleted for obscure reasons, but it is still viewable in web archives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the article, the technology is touted as a possible treatment for Parkinson\u2019s and Alzheimer\u2019s disease. However, the article also states that \u201cit can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you\u201d. It can also be used to completely control a person\u2019s mind, remotely. The article states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind\u2019s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.<\/p>

This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The conclusion of the article: Nobody can stop scientists from developing this technology. To prevent misuse, it should be regulated by organizations such as \u2026 the WEF. That\u2019s convenient because some companies developing this technology are part of the WEF. Do you see where this is going?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works Oxford University’s Antoine Jerusalem explains the art of ultrasound neuromodulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the moment, non-invasive neuromodulation \u2013 changing brain activity without the use of surgery \u2013 looks poised to usher in a new era of healthcare. Breakthroughs could include the better management of Parkinson\u2019s and Alzheimer\u2019s disease, reducing the pain of migraines or even reversing cognitive disorders caused by brain injury<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But what happens if this technique for altering our brain waves escapes regulation and falls into the wrong hands? Imagine a dictatorial regime with access to the tricks and tools to change the way its citizens think or behave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That\u2019s the ethical battleground that Antoine Jerusalem, a professor of engineering science at Oxford University, finds himself in as he researches the potential of ultrasound technology to tackle neurological diseases and disorders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this interview, conducted as part of the World Economic Forum’s annual gathering in the Middle East of scientists, government and business, he tells us more about this growing field of research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Controlling the brain with sound waves: how does it work?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well, to get straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then hopefully, given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you want to get rid of neurons that have gone wild, for example in epilepsy, then you might want to crank up the energy to essentially kill them. But if you want to selectively promote or block the neuronal activity, you need to fine-tune your ultrasound waves carefully.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, there\u2019s a difference between ultrasound stimulation used for removing tissue, and ultrasound neuromodulation, which is aimed at controlling neuronal activity without damaging the tissue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ultrasound neuromodulation is something that definitely works, but that we still don\u2019t understand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

What social good can come of it?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The current buzzwords are Alzheimer\u2019s and Parkinson\u2019s disease, as well as traumatic brain injuries. But scientists are also looking at the spinal cord and peripheral nervous systems.As far as I am concerned, since the brain is the de facto centre of decision for so many processes, any of them could be targeted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is it safe?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When attempting to ‘control’ neuronal activity by providing minute mechanical vibrations to a region of the brain, it’s important that the focus of the ultrasound, frequency and amplitude are properly tuned, or the brain can potentially be damaged. The point is that we still don’t know how to tune all of this; and if I were to exaggerate a bit, I could say that our current approach is not that far off from fiddling around with the settings on a radio until we hear the right station.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the many difficulties is to know for sure that we are indeed controlling<\/em> neurons with these sound waves, as opposed to damaging them. The truth is that we still don\u2019t know how the process works. And if you don\u2019t know how it works, you don\u2019t know how much is “too much”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What are the biggest ethical challenges?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The potential of this technique is huge – by that I mean the sheer number of applications, as well as the ethical use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From a biological perspective, it\u2019s similar to drugs. It can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you. It\u2019s all about staying within a given set of rules. From an ethical perspective, the world is changing so fast that it\u2019s difficult to assess what will be acceptable tomorrow that is not today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am also convinced that human nature is such that if something can be done, it will be done. The question is by whom. I would rather have a fair society leading the dance than some rogue state without any respect for human or animal life. If we want to lead that dance 10 years from now, we need to start researching today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How dystopian could it get?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What can we do to safeguard its potential?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am not going to argue that scientists are all wise and knowledgeable when it comes to what should and should not be done. Some of us will go as far as we can get away with. But that\u2019s human nature, and not unique to scientists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Either way, our job is to find something that is beneficial to humanity. And if you find a way to make somebody better, then you most likely also know how to do the contrary. The goal is to make sure that regulation prevents the latter, without impeding the former. I believe that this is the role of regulators. And I think that the European Union, where I work, is quite good at this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another role of politicians should be to provide a communication platform to explain the long vision of any given area of research. And it can be too early, or not a good idea, and the final decision might very well be to stop it. But in the long term, the public should have the potential benefits of a new technology explained to them in plain words, which is something that scientists are not necessarily good at.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Politicians should remember that if we don\u2019t do it, then somebody somewhere will do it anyway\u2026potentially unregulated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#8 Pills That Contain Microchips<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Once again, this title sounds like a far-fetched conspiracy theory cleverly worded for sensationalism. It is not. Here\u2019s a video from the WEF\u2019s 2018 meeting where Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, talks about pills that contain microchips.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n<\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bourla says:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cFDA approved the first \u2018electronic pill\u2019, if I can call it like that. It is basically a biological chip that is in the tablet and, once you take the tablet, and it disolves into your stomach, it sends a signal that you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of that, the compliance. The insurance companies would know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Is this field truly fascinating? Or utterly dystopian? As Bourla himself said: Imagine the compliance. This kind of technology could easily open the door to all kinds of nefarious applications. Since then, COVID put Pfizer in a position of power never seen before for a pharmaceutical company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Like Pfizer, the WEF is also using COVID to further its agenda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#7 Praising Massive Lockdowns<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In 2020 and 2021, cities around the world were subjected to massive and drastic lockdowns, causing job losses, suicides, drug overdoses, isolation, mental health issues, domestic abuse, bankruptcies, and homelessness. During this horrific period, children could not attend school for months and were essentially barred from interacting with other children. A slew of small and medium businesses was destroyed while large corporations strived.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite all of this, the WEF could not hide its love of drastic, life-destroying lockdowns. In fact, it released a video surrealistically called \u201cLockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world\u201d. Here\u2019s this piece of complete insanity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n<\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The video states \u201cLockdowns significantly reduced human activity \u2026 leading to Earth\u2019s quietest period in decades,\u201d while showing dystopian images of empty cities and planes stuck on the ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Completely ignoring the immense human suffering caused by these lockdowns, the WEF considered it was all worth it because \u201ccarbon emissions were down 7% in 2020\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When this thing was first posted, it garnered intense backlash. So the WEF deleted the video above and posted this tweet.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

As you can see, despite deleting the video, the WEF kept praising lockdowns. That\u2019s because the WEF would love to see \u201ccovidian\u201d life become permanent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#6 \u201cTake a Peek at the Future\u201d<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Judging by comments on YouTube and social media, people absolutely hate videos created by the WEF. But they keep coming. Because they don\u2019t care what you think. They just want to plant their seed of insanity into your mind. In a video titled \u201cHow our lives could soon look\u201d (read my full article about it here), the WEF invites viewers to \u201ctake a peek at the future\u201d. And it is BLEAK. It is all about making COVID life permanent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is how our lives could soon look.<\/p>

Take a peak at the future: pic.twitter.com\/sR7l66C95C<\/p>

\u2014 World Economic Forum (@wef) August 17, 2021<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The video is filled with masked people, purell dispensers, and QR codes. This is the future they want. Then, there\u2019s this nugget of insanity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No. Go away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The video proudly says:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cNASA has invented a system that can ID you from your heartbeat using a laser.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

As if that wasn\u2019t enough, the video shows children stuck at home and being schooled through screens. The video ends by showing people wearing masks outside, like crazy people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NONE. Go away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#5 Pushing For a Great Reset<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

As stated above, the WEF perceives the pandemic as an \u201copportunity\u201d. It is not only an opportunity to reshape our personal existence but to restructure the entire world structure according to its principles. The WEF calls it \u201cthe Great Reset\u201d. To promote this Reset (that absolutely nobody wants) the WEF released a propaganda video (it really fits the definition of \u201cpropaganda\u201d). Here it is in all of its insanity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n<\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When I posted an article about this video in 2021, the comments were not yet turned off. And I took a screenshot of the top ones.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

This short video manages to contain an incredible amount of subversive messages. It even ridiculizes \u201cconspiracy theories\u201d while, astoundingly, confirming these theories.<\/ins><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A screenshot from the video. Are you serious?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The video also announced the \u201cdeath of capitalism\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another surreal screenshot from the video.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While capitalism is based on a self-regulating system of offer and demand, the Great Reset looks to redefine the way businesses are evaluated through new parameters. The main one: Compliance with the elite\u2019s social and political agendas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Towards the end, the narrator utters this enigmatic sentence:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAnd that\u2019s all about getting the right people in the right place at the right time\u201d.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

While the video doesn\u2019t quite explain what this sentence actually means in real-life situations, its implications are rather chilling. Instead of allowing successful individuals and businesses to grow organically, the elite\u2019s system would interfere to \u201cget the right people at the right place at the right time\u201d, in accordance with its agenda. In other words, the system would be rigged and compliance with a wider agenda would be mandatory in a new economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The video ends with a call to viewers to get involved. However, of course, you\u2019re not actually invited to the WEF. In fact, they\u2019re actually looking to \u201crecalibrate\u201d your freedom of speech.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#4 \u201cRecalibrating\u201d freedom of speech<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

An easy way to identify world leaders who are groomed by the WEF is through their incessant railing against free speech. They absolutely hate it and they\u2019re constantly calling for the internet to be censored and highly regulated. At the 2022 Davos meeting, Australian \u201ceSafety commissioner\u201d Julie Inman Grant stated that we need a \u201crecalibration of free speech\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Australian eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant tells the World Economic Forum we need a \u201crecalibration\u201d of freedom of speech. pic.twitter.com\/zEq72wFhNf<\/p>

\u2014 Andrew Lawton (@AndrewLawton) May 23, 2022<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Grant said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere and everything feels binary when it doesn\u2019t need to be. So I think we\u2019re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online. You know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Here, Grant essentially calls for censorship. She even believes that freedom of speech as a human right should be \u201crecalibrated\u201d using \u201conline violence\u201d as an excuse. There is no such thing as \u201conline violence\u201d. They love to equate speech with violence. It is an extremely manipulative way of justifying China-style censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Free speech is, in fact, binary. Either it exists or it doesn\u2019t. And they clearly don\u2019t want it to exist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#3 Tracking Your Clothes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The WEF wants to control your clothes. And they\u2019ve made a video about it. Did I mention that people absolutely hate WEF videos? Here\u2019s another one that got people\u2019s blood boiling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Using the environment as an excuse (as usual), the WEF announced the coming of clothing laced with \u201cdigital passports\u201d that can be traced at all times. Backed by Microsoft (of course), these garments will apparently flood the market by 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They really want RFID chips and QR codes everywhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the WEF, these chips will allow fashion brands to resell their clothes. I have no idea how that would work. The video makes sure NOT to mention that this technology would be a great way of tracking those who ditched their smartphones.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But ditching your smartphone might become \u2026 impossible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#2 \u201cSmartphones will be in your body by 2030\u201d<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

At the 2022 Davos meeting, Nokia CEO Pekka Lundmark claimed that, by 2030, \u201csmartphones will be implanted directly into the body.\u201d This would coincide with the coming of 6G technology, which is expected to be launched by the end of the decade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n<\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, this site has been documenting the elite\u2019s incessant push for transhumanism, which is the merging of humans with machines. They\u2019re looking to accelerate this transition by making things people cannot live without (such as smartphones) available in transhumanist form.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are you noticing their creepy eagerness to insert things inside our bodies?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#1 \u201cYou\u2019ll Own Nothing. And You\u2019ll Be Happy.\u201d<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

This is probably the most dystopian moment in WEF history. In 2016, Ida Auken, a Member of Parliament in Denmark said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWelcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better\u201d.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The WEF loved that quote so much that it tweeted about it.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The WEF also created a video (that everybody absolutely hated) titled \u201c8 Predictions for the World in 2030\u201d. Here\u2019s a screenshot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The WEF loves to phrase its \u201cpredictions\u201d in a non-conditional form, as if they\u2019re an inevitability. But look at this smiling guy. He\u2019s clearly happy. Thank you WEF!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An article on the WEF\u2019s website explains:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI don\u2019t own anything. I don\u2019t own a car. I don\u2019t own a house. I don\u2019t own any appliances or any clothes,\u201d writes Danish MP Ida Auken. Shopping is a distant memory in the city of 2030, whose inhabitants have cracked clean energy and borrow what they need on demand. It sounds utopian, until she mentions that her every move is tracked and outside the city live swathes of discontents, the ultimate vision of a society split in two.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

In this dystopian future, there are no products you can own. Only \u201cservices\u201d that are rented and delivered using drones. This system would make all humans completely dependent on WEF-controlled corporations for every single basic need. There would be absolutely no autonomy, no freedom, and no privacy. And you\u2019ll be happy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Honorable Mention: Individual carbon footprint tracker<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

At the 2022 Davos meeting, Alibaba Group president J. Michael Evans announced the development of an \u201cindividual carbon tracker\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alibaba Group president J. Michael Evans boasts at the World Economic Forum about the development of an \u201cindividual carbon footprint tracker\u201d to monitor what you buy, what you eat, and where\/how you travel. pic.twitter.com\/sisSrUngDI<\/p>

\u2014 Andrew Lawton (@AndrewLawton) May 24, 2022<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Once again, the WEF uses the environment to promote the micro-management of human behavior. Evans says that the tracker can monitor \u201cwhere they\u2019re traveling, how they\u2019re traveling, what are they\u2019re eating and what are they consuming on the platform\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Notice that he used the pronoun \u201cthey\u201d and not \u201cwe\u201d because there is no way in hell he\u2019s going to use that thing. Me neither.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Upon reviewing this list, two common themes become obvious. The first theme is \u201cpenetration\u201d. The WEF wants to penetrate governments using \u201cGlobal Leaders\u201d (aka Manchurian candidates). It also wants to penetrate our bodies through pills, microchips, and vaccines. It also wants to penetrate our minds using soundwaves, censorship, and propaganda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The other theme is \u201ccontrol\u201d. They want to control what we think, where we go, what we say, what we eat, and what we wear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Do you know who agrees with the WEF? China. Censorship is widespread, a social credit system controls people\u2019s behaviors and COVID is still used as an excuse for massive lockdowns and total population control. Not to mention the literal concentration camps. Despite all of this, Chinese officials are constantly present at WEF meetings. Why? Because China is basically a laboratory for the WEF\u2019s policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With all of that being said, how can we counteract the WEF\u2019s insanity? How can we vote them out if they were never voted in? A first step would be to elect \u2013 at all levels of government \u2013 representatives that want nothing to do with the WEF. If our elected officials treated the WEF as the rogue, illegitimate organization that it is, its influence would be greatly reduced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Second, we can boycott every company that is part of the WEF. I realize this is easier said than done because many of these companies are virtual monopolies. However, if we stop giving them our money, they\u2019ll stop using our money to poison our lives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Then, they\u2019ll own nothing. And we\u2019ll all be happy.<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is one of the most powerful organizations in the world. And, throughout the years, people at the WEF have said some truly insane and dystopian things. And they\u2019ve managed to word these things in the creepiest ways possible. Here are the top 10 most insane things said by the WEF. … Leer m\u00e1s<\/a><\/p>\n\n

\n Sharing is caring<\/span><\/strong> \n <\/i> Share<\/span><\/a>\n <\/i> +1<\/span><\/a>\n <\/i> Tweet<\/span><\/a>\n <\/i> Share<\/span><\/a>\n <\/i> Share<\/span><\/a>\n 4130 words 146 views<\/w>\n <\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7505,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7499","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sin-categoria"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7499","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7499"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7499\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7508,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7499\/revisions\/7508"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7505"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7499"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7499"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abudinen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7499"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}