“Las personas que las realizan no son actores, sino que usualmente es gente que siente el tema porque ha estado en una situación parecida al caso que se está llevando a cabo. Entonces ellos no están actuando, sino que están viviendo su problema. Pero sí, hay casos que son recreados y yo no sé cuáles son”, agregó seghún consigna Emol.
The company, and its actions during its first 15 years, became the subject of political and media scrutiny as a result of co-founder Mitt Romney’s later political career, especially his 2012 presidential campaign.[9][10]
[9] Knickerbocker, Brad (June 23, 2012). “Why is Mitt Romney’s time at Bain Capital such a target?”. The Christian Science Monitor.
[10] Fifield, Anna; McGregor, Richard (September 21, 2012). “Romney releases tax return detail”. Financial Times.
https://www.baincapitalprivateequity.com/people/susan-levine
Managing director
Ms. Levine received an MBA from Harvard Business School, an MA from the University of Pennsylvania, and she graduated magna cum laude with a BS in Spanish/International Affairs from Georgetown University.
READ: https://www.mentealternativa.com/bain-capital-y-el-adoctrinamiento-jesuitico-tras-bill-gates/
Bain & Company and Acumen, with the support of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, undertook a joint four-month research effort
https://www.bain.com/insights/growing-prosperity-executive-summary/
Papa Francisco Jesuits
When a competitor tried to buy Starbucks, Howard Schultz was rescued by Bill Gates Sr.
Published Wed, Oct 4 2017 3:59 PM EDT
Updated Wed, Oct 4 2017 3:59 PM EDT
Kathleen Elkins
@KATHLEEN_ELK
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/04/bill-gates-sr-helped-howard-schultz-buy-starbucks.html
International Planned Parenthood Federation Expands Programs With $1.7 Million Gift From Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
The grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation supports programs for impoverished people in Latin America and the Caribbean
However, in 2016, it also received an award of $75,000 from the James Randi Educational Foundation, an organization formed to debunk paranormal claims. In 2017, it raised approximately $700,000 from a crowd-sourced GoFundMe effort and received $100,000 from Facebook as a part of a fact-checking partnership.[35]
On February 1, 2019, Snopes announced that it had ended its fact-checking partnership with Facebook.
[35] “Disclosures”. Snopes.com. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
James Randi: Why I Came Out at Age 81 | Big Think
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5QLt6EO3k28
‘Fact checking’ website Snopes on verge of collapse after founder is accused of fraud, lies, and putting prostitutes and his honeymoon on expenses (and it hasn’t told its readers THOSE facts)
By Alana Goodman For Dailymail.com21:13 26 Jul 2017, updated 22:47 26 Jul 2017
‘Fact-checking’ website Snopes is asking its users for help in a GoFundMe saying an ‘outside vendor’ is ‘holding it hostage’
But the site which claims to be ‘transparent’ and to tell people the facts they need to know hasn’t told those donating everything that is going on
In fact it is at the center of a bitter legal battle with its CEO being accused of fraud, lies, conspiracy and putting prostitutes and his honeymoon on expenses
David Mikkelson set up company which owns Snopes.com in 2003 with then wife Barbara but she sold her 50 per cent stake during bitter divorce
Owners of company which provided it with tech and advertising services bought her stake but have now fallen out with Mikkelson and call him a fraudster
Case could see judge order site closed – despite it being chosen by Facebook to arbitrate on fake news
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html
Change Org Charitable Foundation
Date: November 2016
Purpose: to build a global network of activists who are equipped to wage and win their own women and girl rights issue battles, in India and globally
Amount: $4,745,619
Term: 50
Topic: Empower Women and Girls
Regions Served: GLOBAL|ASIA
Program: Advocacy
Grantee Location: San Francisco, California
Grantee Website: http://www.changefoundation.org/
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database/Grants/2016/11/OPP1158269
Reid Hoffman, Bill Gates, Sam Altman invest $30 million in Change.org
Katie Roof
@katie_roof / 6:34 pm PDT • May 26, 2017
https://techcrunch.com/2017/05/26/reid-hoffman-bill-gates-sam-altman-invest-30-million-in-change-org/amp/
REVIEWWWWW: https://septicskeptics.com/james-randi/
El médico nazi que mató a 100 personas sumergiéndolas en agua con hielo
Publicado el 21 ene. 2019
Sigmund Rascher buscaba tratamientos contra la hipotermia para pilotos derribados en el océano. Visita http://elpais.com
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qTfXKRpi2Bk
Nazis Were Given ‘Safe Haven’ in U.S., Report Says
Dr. Josef Mengele in 1956, left. Arthur Rudolph, center, in 1990, was a rocket scientist for Nazi Germany and NASA. John Demjanjuk in 2006.Credit…Left and center, Dave Dieter/The Huntsville Times, via AP; C.H. Pete Copeland/Plain Dealer, via AP
By Eric Lichtblau
Nov. 13, 2010
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/us/14nazis.html
Operation Paperclip was a secret initiative launched by the U.S. government to recruit German NAZIS engineers, doctors, physicists, chemists and other scientific experts for U.S. technological advancement
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/16/fact-check-nazi-scientists-brought-u-s-operation-paperclip/5690870002/
Jesus confirms that John the Baptist was only a type of Elijah in Matthew 11:
Matt. 11:14 “And if you are willing to accept it, John himself is Elijah who was to come.
Jesus says for those who were willing to accept what John preached, John was Elijah. In other words, Jesus says for the one willing to accept Jesus as Messiah, John becomes that person’s “Elijah” in the sense that John was a herald announcing Jesus’ first coming like Elijah announces the Second Coming. That person need not wait for Elijah in order to have the Messiah. The person can accept John’s testimony instead, and for that person John is their “Elijah.”
Jesus was confirming that John was a type of Elijah, though not the actual Elijah. If John were the actual Elijah, then Jesus would not have needed to add the statement, “if you are willing to accept it.” If John were truly Elijah, then Jesus would have said John was Elijah regardless of whether someone accepted it or not.
Sargon II Conocido por su mención en el Libro de Isaías, fue el primer rey asirio cuyo nombre se logró descifrar a mediados del siglo XIX.
Elections:Federal Efforts to Improve Security and Reliability of Electronic Voting Systems Are Under Way, but Key Activities Need to Be Completed
GAO-05-956Published: Sep 21, 2005. Publicly Released: Oct 21, 2005.
https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-05-956
21 sep. 2005 — Other suggested practices include testing and certifying systems against national voting system standards. The federal government has begun …
107 páginas·1 MB
Not found: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05956.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj95I-HvKLvAhVrpVkKHWbZA1AQFjAAegQIBBAD&usg=AOvVaw3LD2vP2wat4Xet38AylrfT
Black box voting signifies voting on voting machines which do not disclose how they operate such as with closed source or proprietary operations. If a voting machine does not provide a tangible record of individual votes cast then it can be described as black box voting.[1]
[1] Janet Lynn Evans (2007). “We’ll Take Care of the Counting*”: A Cultural, Rhetorical and Critical Analysis of Electronic Voting Technology (Dissertation). University of Colorado Boulder. p. 166.
Both optical scan systems which interpret paper ballots and Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) systems can be black box systems; in fact, mechanical voting machines can also be seen as black-box systems, since only the technicians who set up the machines have access to the linkages between the voting levers on the face of the machine and the vote recording counters inside. Rhode Island supreme court justice Horatio Rogers, in an 1897 dissenting opinion, wrote of one early mechanical voting machine that
… a voter on this voting machine has no knowledge, through his senses that he has accomplished a result. The most that can be said is, if the machine worked as intended, then he has made his holes and voted. It does not seem to me that this is enough.[3]
[3] Horation Rogers, Dissenting Opinion, In re Voting Machine, Atlantic Reporter, Vol. 36, West, St. Paul, 1897; page 717 (19 R.I. 1729 (1897))
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Date: November 2001
Purpose: to support urban high school reform through the Schools for a New Society initiative
Amount: $9,364,000
Term: 50
Topic: K-12 Education
Program: United States
Grantee Location: New York, New York
Bill and melinda gates
—
As part of this refocus, the Ford Foundation announced in 2016 that it would lead a six-year effort to raise $100 million for the Movement for Black Lives, an organization designed to receive grants for groups involved in the Black Lives Matter movement. Allies of the Ford Foundation in this effort are the foundations associated with liberal billionaire George Soros, the NoVo Foundation, and the Hill-Snowden Foundation.[31]
Valerie Richardson, “Black Lives Matter Cashes $100 Million Foundation Check,” Washington Times, August 16, 2016 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/16/black-lives-mtter-cashes-100-million-liberal-foun ^
Henry Ford foundation antisemitic freemason
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/news/freemasons-facts-symbols-handshake-meaning
https://www.universalfreemasonry.org/en/famous-freemasons/henry-ford
John F. Kowal
Vice President, Programs
Before joining the Brennan Center, Kowal developed and led grantmaking programs at the Open Society Foundations and Ford Foundation on issues related to democracy, justice, human rights, and the rule of law.
https://www.brennancenter.org/experts/john-f-kowal
RESTORING THE RIGHT TO VOTE
Erika Wood
The author would like to thank Judith Joffe-Block, Larry Schwartztol, and Denise Schulman for their invaluable research assistance, and Matt Robinson, Carl Wicklund, Deborah Goldberg, Ryan King, Kimberly Haven, Andres Idarraga, Denver Schimming, Koren Carbuccia, Myrna Pérez, Renée Paradis, Ana Muñoz, and members of the Brennan Center Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Advisory Council for their helpful comments. The Center thanks the Carnegie Corporation of New York, Educational Foundation of America, Ford Foundation, JEHT Foundation, Open Society Institute, and an anonymous donor for the generous support that made this paper possible.
https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/restoring-right-vote
https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/uploads/312f4bfc-e19e-4c9c-a0bd-2d83bddaf6ef/Brennan_RestoringVote_2008.pdf
2018
The Brennan Center would like to thank those
who so generously supported our work in 2018, with special recognition of the following leaders:*
Over $1,000,000
Ford Foundation†
The Lakeshore Foundation†
Open Society Foundations
The Bernard and Anne Spitzer Charitable Trust†
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/424483353-2018-Annual-Report-Brennan-Center-for-Justice.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiK8ejEw6PvAhWixFkKHXD2BCUQFjABegQIAxAJ&usg=AOvVaw3HMmD-MR6TFmVRwVXimWfs
Arnold ventures abortion
https://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/02/opinions/arnold-texas-abortion-law/index.html
Influence watch
Capital Research Center (CRC) is an American conservative non-profit organization located in Washington, D.C.[2][3] Its stated purpose is “to study non-profit organizations, with a special focus on reviving the American traditions of charity, philanthropy, and voluntarism.”[4] According to The Washington Post, it also discourages donations by corporations and non-profits supporting what it sees as liberal or anti-business policies.[5] It monitors the giving of major liberal donors in the U.S.[3]
[2] Vogel, Kenneth; Debenedetti, Gabriel (January 18, 2017). “Dems jockey for big money control”. Politico. Retrieved 25 March 2018.
[3] Vogel, Kenneth; Vinik, Danny (November 1, 2016). “Podesta paid $7,000 a month by top donor”. Politico. Retrieved 25 March 2018.
[4] Crane, Michael (2004). The Political Junkie Handbook. SP Books. ISBN978-1-56171-891-7.
[5] Barr, Stephen (July 2, 1997). “12 Foundations Push Conservative Agenda; $210 Million Given Over 3 Years”. The Washington Post. p. A.21.
In 2017, the CRC launched the website Influence Watch, which focuses on identifying funding sources of progressive organizations and initiatives
William J. Brennan Center for Justice
The Center has devised a “robust toolkit’ of scholarship, legislative drafting, lobbying and legal action”[3] that is merged into “an almost seamless effort aimed at action.”[4] While the group purports to be “nonpartisan,” it has received substantial funding from George Soros-associated organizations,[5] and is mainly funded by left-leaning organizations, having received substantial funding from other liberal groups including the Kohlberg Foundation, Tides Foundation, Proteus Fund, Joyce Foundation, Schumann Media Center, Public Welfare Foundation, and JPB Foundation.[6]
3. Katz, Lee Michael. “The Brennan Center for Justice A Bipartisan Champion of Democracy Comes of Age.” Carnegie Results Newsletter. Summer 2008. Archived March 20, 2014. Accessed July 31, 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20140320161508/https://www.carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/carnegie_results_sum08.pdf/) ^
Carnegie results summer 2008
The Brennan Center for Justice
A Bipartisan Champion of Democracy Comes of Age
4. Katz, Lee Michael. “The Brennan Center for Justice A Bipartisan Champion of Democracy Comes of Age.” Carnegie Results Newsletter. Summer 2008. Archived March 20, 2014. Accessed July 31, 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20140320161508/https://www.carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/carnegie_results_sum08.pdf/)
5. Kroll, Alex J. “Dismantling Self-Government: The Brennan Center’s Election Fraud Offensive.” Capital Research Center. April 1, 2014, Accessed July 31, 2017. https://capitalresearch.org/article/dismantling-self-government-the-brennan-centers-election-fraud-offensive/ ^
6. Author’s analysis of data compiled by FoundationSearch.com, a project of Metasoft Systems, from tax returns filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Queries conducted August 1, 2017 ^
Ballotpedia is a nonprofit and nonpartisan online political encyclopedia that covers American federal, state, and local politics, elections, and public policy.[2][3][4][5] Written by a staff of researchers and writers, the website was founded in 2007.[6][7] Ballotpedia is sponsored by the Lucy Burns Institute, a nonprofit organization based in Middleton, Wisconsin. As of 2014, Ballotpedia employed 34 writers and researchers;[8] it reported an editorial staff of over 50 in 2018.[9]
[2] Chokshi, Niraj (September 9, 2014). “Tuesday is the last day of the state legislative primary season”. Washington Post. Retrieved 8 December 2014.
[3] Wisniewski, Mary; Hendee, David (January 24, 2011). “Omaha mayoral recall vote part of angry voter trend”. Reuters. Retrieved 8 December 2014.
[4] Dewan, Shaila (November 5, 2014). “Higher Minimum Wage Passes in 4 States; Florida Defeats Marijuana Measure”. The New York Times. Retrieved 8 December 2014.
[5] Morones, Alyssa (2013-08-22). “Ballotpedia Launches ‘Wikipedia’ for School Board Elections”. Education Week. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
[6] Chokshi, Niraj (November 5, 2018). “Voter Guide: How, When and Where to Vote on Tuesday”. New York Times. Retrieved 19 December 2018.
[7] Levine, Andrew (October 29, 2018). “New York Today: Why Don’t We Have Early Voting?”. New York Times. Retrieved 19 December 2018.
Ballotpedia
Brennan Center for Justice
Opposition
The National Center for Public Policy Research
In 2012, Justin Danhof of the National Center for Public Policy Research—a group described as a conservative communications and research foundation on its website—stated, “The Brennan Center is on a mission to undermine support for voter integrity measures, claiming that state-level voter ID provisions will disfranchise millions of voters and that voter fraud rarely occurs. However, some of its major reports concerning voter ID measures and voter fraud are wrought with bias and have been refuted by election scholars.” The group also claimed that the Brennan Center had received at least $7 million from progressive activist George Soros.[13][14][15]
National Center for Public Policy Research, “Report Exposes Brennan Center for Justice’s Biased Reporting and Liberal Funding, New GroupSnoop.org Profile of the Brennan Center for Justice Released, Leading Opponent of Voter Integrity Measures is Financed By George Soros,” July 26, 2012
http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-Brennan_Center_072612.html
MRC Business, “Soros-Backed Voting Study Promoted By Soros-Funded Media,” October 6, 2011
http://www.mrc.org/articles/soros-backed-voting-study-promoted-soros-funded-media
Time, “Turning Dollars into Change,” September 1, 1997
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,986919-1,00.html
The Brennan Center would like to thank those who so generously supported our work in 2019, with special recognition of the following leaders:*
$2,000,000+
Arnold Ventures
Lakeshore Foundation
$1,000,000 – $1,999,999
Ford Foundation
Craig Newmark Philanthropies
Quadrivium
The Bernard and Anne Spitzer Charitable Trust
$500,000 – $999,999
Gail Furman
The JPB Foundation
Open Society Foundations
As we look out into the Universe and identify the many accidents of physics and astronomy that have worked together to our benefit, it almost seems as if the Universe must in some sense have known that we were coming.
As quoted in The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (1986) by John D. Barrow and Frank J. Tipler, p. 318
Sharing is caringFacebookX / TwitterLinkedInWhatsAppTelegramRedditEmail2914 words · 155 views