out of thin air.
In The Case Against the Fed, Murray Rothbard argued in 1994 that, although a supposed core function of the Federal Reserve is to maintain a low level of inflation, its policies (like those of other central banks) have actually aggravated inflation. This occurs when the Fed creates too much fiat money backed by nothing. He called the Fed policy of money creation “legalized counterfeiting” and favored a return to the gold standard.[5] He wrote:
[I]t is undeniable that, ever since the Fed was visited upon us in 1914, our inflations have been more intense, and our depressions far deeper, than ever before. There is only one way to eliminate chronic inflation, as well as the booms and busts brought by that system of inflationary credit: and that is to eliminate the counterfeiting that constitutes and creates that inflation. And the only way to do that is to abolish legalized counterfeiting: that is, to abolish the Federal Reserve System, and return to the gold standard, to a monetary system where a market-produced metal, such as gold, serves as the standard money, and not paper tickets printed by the Federal Reserve.[6]
- Murray Rothbard (2007). The Case Against the Fed. Ludwig Von Mises Institute. pp. 27–29, 146. ISBN 978-0945466178.
- ^ Murray Rothbard (2007). The Case Against the Fed. Ludwig Von Mises Institute. p. 146. ISBN 978-0945466178.
One critique is that the Federal Open Market Committee, which is part of the Federal Reserve System, lacks transparency and is not sufficiently audited.[66] A report by Bloomberg News asserts that the majority of Americans believes that the System should be held more accountable or that it should be abolished.[67] Another critique is the contention that the public should have a right to know what goes on in the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings.[68][69][70]
- Poole, William (July 2002). “Untold story of FOMC: Secrecy is exaggerated”. St. Louis Federal Reserve.
- ^ Zumbrun, Joshua (9 December 2010). “Majority of Americans Say Fed Should Be Reined In or Abolished, Poll Shows”. Bloomberg.
- ^ Poole, William (6 October 2004). “FOMC Transparency”(PDF). Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 87: 1–9.
- ^ “Remarks by Chairman Alan Greenspan – Transparency in monetary policy”. Federal Reserve. 11 October 2001.
- ^ “Remarks by Vice Chairman Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.—Transparency in Central Banking: Rationale and Recent Developments”. Federal Reserve. 19 April 2001.
El hundimiento del RMS Lusitania, ocurrido frente a las costas de Irlanda el 7 de mayo de 1915 a causa del ataque de un submarino alemán, fue uno de los mayores desastres navales ocurridos a un buque de línea durante la Primera Guerra Mundial.
Es interesante lo que ocurrió tras este hundimiento hizo que la opinión pública en muchos países se opusiera al imperio alemán ya sus aliados lo que contribuyó a la entrada de eeuu en el gran conflicto bélico mundial y se convirtió en un símbolo para las campañas militares de reclutamiento este conflicto bélico como todos los demás sólo beneficiaría a los banqueros privados que se enriquecieron con los créditos ofrecidos para el gasto militar de todas las naciones sin importar el bando al que pertenecían.
Titanic
Morgan Robertson a la edad de 53 años apareció muerto 3 años después del hundimiento del titanic, 17 años después de escribir su novela en 1898. Ese evento cambio de forma drástica la historia de la humanidad y como nada ocurre por casualidad, algunos apuntan a que fue planeado por las personas que después se convertirían en las más ricas y poderosas de la tierra.
Ciertas personas salieron muy beneficiadas tras ese fatídico acontecimiento. Desde entonces se encuentran en la cima de la economía y el poder mientras tanto los ciudadanos de todos los países del mundo seguimos ignorantes y contribuyendo con nuestro dinero y trabajo a que ellos sigan en la cúspide de la pirámide.
El hundimiento del titanic tuvo un efecto colateral afectando también al mundo energético. John jacob astor aparte de ser el hombre más rico en esa época era un gran amigo de nikola tesla y por supuesto su principal mecenas. Tesla disponía de los fondos necesarios para desarrollar sus experimentos de energía libre además se hospedaba en el waldorf astoria también propiedad de astor. Sin embargo después del hundimiento del titanic tesla contrajo una gran cantidad de deudas que no pudo pagar y tuvo que desmantelar sus aparatos.
Morgan financió a nikola tesla hasta el año 1906 cuando construyó la torre de wardenclyffe con la que pretendía enviar energía a través de la atmósfera a cualquier lugar con coste cero, es decir energía gratuita. Algo que no sentó nada bien a morgan dueño de la general electric company y poseedor del monopolio de la electricidad al parecer morgan hizo todo lo posible para que dicha tecnología no se desarrollara porque lo hubiera arruinado económicamente.
Deudas impuestos
En 1903 el magnate y banquero john pierpont morgan más conocido como jp morgan al frente de la y m m international mercantil marín company adquirió la white star line una línea naviera británica de transporte de mercancías y pasajeros. Cuatro años más tarde en 1907 comenzó la construcción de una serie de buques de lujo para el traslado de personas a largas distancias serían los barcos más grandes jamás construidos hasta ese momento así surgieron tres naves prácticamente iguales el británico el olympique y el titanic estos dos últimos casi identicos al mismo tiempo en aquellos años se estaba gestando un movimiento financiero de control por parte de las principales fortunas encabezadas por los personajes más destacados de las organizaciones pertenecientes a las familias morgan rockefeller y ross que pretendían la creación de la reserva federal de eeuu eso significaba que un banco central controlaría la economía estadounidense pero lo peor de todo es que estaría en manos privadas como ya ocurría en otros países europeos estos hombres sin escrúpulos habían dejado de luchar entre ellos para unir fuerzas y crear un sistema de deuda que los enriqueciera aún más a costa de empobrecer a los ciudadanos que eran los que a través de los impuestos estarían obligados sin saberlo a pagar esa deuda algo que por desgracia seguimos sufriendo desde que se hicieron con los bancos centrales de todos los países del mundo este plan fue advertido por algunos opositores gente económicamente muy poderosa que se posicionó en contra de la creación de la reserva federal de eeuu.
El del Titanic es conocido como uno de los mayores desastres marítimos en tiempos de paz de la historia. La tragedia sucedió dos años antes del inicio de la Primera Guerra Mundial. Pero hay quienes todavía especulan que un submarino alemán estaría detrás del hundimiento del barco.
Si tal teoría fuese cierta, el hundimiento del Titanic habría sido precursor al del Lusitania. En 1915, un submarino alemán atacó el transatlántico británico situado frente a la costa de Irlanda, acabando con la vida de 1.198 personas.
Aunque la teoría carece de pruebas, ciertamente no se encuentra fuera del ámbito de lo posible.
Varios supervivientes del Titanic declararon haber avistado “un barco no identificado a aproximadamente cinco o seis millas de distancia” del navío que se estaba hundiendo, el cual supuestamente permaneció en la superficie hasta las 2 de la madrugada, de acuerdo con el artículo del Dr. Franklin Ruehl’s para The Huffington Post. Ruehl especuló que posiblemente se tratase de “un submarino que había emergido a la superficie para evaluar el daño que había causado, después de lo cual se escondió”, y también citó testimonios de supervivientes que declaraban haber escuchado una serie de explosiones que parecían estallar contra el barco a gran profundidad.
“El submarino pudo haber atacado deliberadamente al lujoso transatlántico o haber chocado accidentalmente contra él”, escribió Ruehl. https://www.businessinsider.es/5-teorias-conspiracion-torno-hundimiento-titanic-200672
About federal reserve Astor and Guggenheim did not take a public stance on the matter
Futility, or the Wreck of the Titan (en español: El naufragio del Titan o Futilidad) fue una novela escrita por Morgan Robertson en 1898. La historia trata sobre el ficticio transatlántico Titan y su hundimiento, el cual guarda muchas similitudes con el RMS Titanic, que se hundiría catorce años después de la publicación de la novela.
John Jacob Astor IV (13 de julio de 1864 – 15 de abril de 1912) fue un empresario estadounidense, constructor de bienes raíces, inversionista, inventor, escritor, teniente coronel de la Guerra hispano-estadounidense y miembro prominente de la familia Astor.
Isidor Straus (Otterberg, Alemania; 6 de febrero de 1845–Atlántico norte, 15 de abril de 1912) fue un prominente empresario judío germano nacionalizado estadounidense, congresista y copropietario de las grandes tiendas de departamentos RH Macy & Co de Nueva York.
Benjamin Guggenheim (Filadelfia, Pennsylvania, 26 de octubre de 1865 – Océano Atlántico, en el hundimiento del RMS Titanic, 15 de abril de 1912) fue un empresario estadounidense, el quinto de los siete hijos del magnate dedicado a la minería y la metalurgia Meyer Guggenheim.
Woodrow Wilson As for the remaining portions of the quote, they can be found in the book “New Freedom” published in 1913, namely in Chapters 8 and 9 where Wilson spoke about monopolies and social justice. This book is a compilation of speeches publicly delivered by Wilson during his 1912 presidential campaign, whereas the Federal Reserve Act was signed by Wilson in December 1913. At the time of Wilson’s presidential campaign, Federal Reserve Act was not under consideration. Therefore, separate authentic portions of the posted quote (marked in yellow and green paint) did not concern the Federal Reserve System.
| Fabricated quote | Chapter 8 of Wilson’s book | Chapter 8 of Wilson’s book |
| “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” | “The great monopoly in this country is the monopoly of big credits. So long as that exists, our old variety and freedom and individual energy of development are out of the question. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men… ” | “We have, not one or two or three, but many, established and formidable monopolies in the United States. We have, not one or two, but many, fields of endeavor into which it is difficult, if not impossible, for the independent man to enter. We have restricted credit, we have restricted opportunity, we have controlled development, and we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.” |
The Federal Reserve Act and in general, the issue of setting up a federal reserve system was part of the policy of combatting monopolies. After several years of debating the development of banking and monetary system, the US Congress adopted the very bill that was supported by Woodrow Wilson, thereby imposing a central government control over the banking system.
John Pierpont Morgan (17 de abril de 1837 – 31 de marzo de 1913) fue un empresario, banquero y coleccionista de arte estadounidense que dominó las finanzas corporativas y la consolidación industrial de su época. Entre sus actividades destacan la fusión de Edison General Electric y Thompson-Houston Electric Company para formar la General Electric Company en 1891, la financiación para la creación de la Federal Steel Company (Compañía Federal de Acero) y la fusión de la Carnegie Steel Company y varias compañías más del sector del hierro y del acero para formar en 1901 la Corporación de Acero de Estados Unidos.
J. P. Morgan cancelled his passage on the Titanic
REVIEW Thus far, canceled bookings for more than 50 passengers have been authenticated, mainly in newspaper stories at the time of the disaster. Names of crew who deserted, failed to join or transferred prior to the voyage appear on a list compiled for the British Board of Trade. https://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/canceled-titanic-passages.html#:~:text=Thus%20far%2C%20canceled%20bookings%20for,the%20British%20Board%20of%20Trade.
NIKOLA TESLA TIMELINE 1912 – TESLA INVESTOR JOHN JACOB ASTOR DIES IN TITANIC SINKING Breadcrumb Home Nikola Tesla 1856 1912 https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/timeline/1912-tesla-investor-john-jacob-astor-dies-titanic-sinking
“Let us control the money of a nation, and we care not who makes its laws” was said to be a “maxim” of the House of Rothschilds
The Titanic hit an iceberg on April 14, 1912, which caused considerable damage, this damage caused the ship to flood and eventually sink. Overconfidence, speed, damaged bulkheads, poor quality rivets, and delays spotting the iceberg also contributed to the sinking. https://emmacruises.com/why-did-the-titanic-sink/
Was Titanic inquiry scuppered by the Freemasons?
A new secret archive shows a high level of masonic involvement in the inquiry into the sinking of the TitanicBy John Bingham ; Johnbingham and Victoria Ward23 November 2015 • 8:58am https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/12010573/Was-Titanic-inquiry-scuppered-by-the-Freemasons.html The inquiry into the sinking of the Titanic may have been influenced by the Freemasons, new evidence suggests.
A secret archive containing the names of two million Freemasons have been made public for the first time which reveals extensive Masonic involvement in the controversial British investigation into the catastrophe. It confirms that not only the judge who oversaw the British Wreck Commissioner’s inquiry into the disaster and leading investigators, but also even some of those who escaped censure were all Freemasons. While a US Senate inquiry into the sinking savaged the White Star Line and singled out the British Board of Trade for blame for lax regulations which allowed the scandalously small number of lifeboats fitted on the ship, the UK investigation overseen by Lord Mersey avoided blaming the Board of Trade. Lord Mersey himself – John Charles Bigham – was, the records show, a Freemason, initiated in 1881 at the Northern Bar Lodge in London. Crucially, so too appears to have been the President of the Board of Trade Sydney Buxton, initiated at Limehouse in East London in 1888 where he was the local MP at the time. https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3363815/posts?page=14
According to new records, Jack the Ripper was an obscure singer whose identity was shielded by fellow Masons. His murders were intricately planned Masonic rituals. https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/new-study-reveals-that-jack-the-ripper-was-a-protected-freemason-who-carried-out-ritualistic-murders/
In the book They All Love Jack: Busting the Ripper, Robinson argues that all of the Ripper killings bore the stamp of Masonic ritual; the symbol of a pair of compasses carved into the face of Catherine Eddowes, the removal of meal buttons and coins from the bodies of Eddowes and Annie Chapman and the cryptic graffiti daubed on a wall in Goulston Street, which he says was “the most flagrant clue of all.”
The new archives prove for the first time that singer Maybrick and his brother James were both masons.
– The Telegraph, Was Titanic inquiry scuppered by the Freemasons?
Did a German U-Boat Sink the Titanic?
Will the Titanic ever be resurrected to assess the destruction and determine if this hypothesis could be viable?By Dr. Franklin Ruehl, Ph.D., ContributorHost, ‘Mysteries From Beyond the Other Dominion’04/10/2012 09:56am EDT | Updated June 10, 2012 Is it possible, just possible, that a German submarine, rather than an iceberg, sank the mighty Titanic? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/-did-a-german-uboat-sink-_b_1413770
When the sunken Titanic was discovered in 1985, its starboard (right) side was embedded in sand. This was the side that had struck the iceberg off of Newfoundland 100 years ago on April 14,1912. So-called “subprofiler” digital images revealed that six rivets has popped off, suggesting that shoddy workmanship led to the ship’s demise. But, this covered only a relatively small area of just 12 square feet, hardly enough to cause the huge luxury liner to sink with such rapidity.
Significantly, several survivors including both passengers and crew members, when questioned by a U.S. Senate inquiry panel, testified that they never felt any impact or heard any sound when the collision occurred, suggesting it was minor in nature. However, they reported having heard four “reports,” or explosions, deep in the bowels of the Titanic AFTER it had scraped the iceberg! These could conceivably have been torpedoes launched by a German submarine.
Moreover, a number of survivors huddled in lifeboats observed a searchlight in the distance, encouraging them that a rescue vessel was approaching. This light had been attributed to the Californian. But, that ship’s captain, Stanley Lord, insisted that it was not his, that there was another vessel between his and the Titanic. Indeed, his craft was mired in a colossal ice field and forced to remain there until daylight. Several sailors on watch asserted that they witnessed an unidentified vessel approximately 5 to 6 miles away until about 2 a.m., possibly a submarine that had surfaced to assess the damage it had caused, after which time it skulked off. For the record, this was not the Carpathia, which arrived on the scene later to assist in rescuing survivors.
Most assuredly, that mystery craft could well have been a German sub, as their U-boat technology was highly perfected by that time and their subs were scanning the North Atlantic then. The sub may have deliberately targeted the luxury liner or possibly accidentally collided with it. It should be noted that a German U-boat did indeed sink the famed Lusitania just three years later in 1915.
Will the Titanic ever be resurrected to assess the destruction and determine if this hypothesis could be viable? Probably not, as it took two years just to recover a relatively small 20-ton section from the 46,000-ton craft. which is in an extremely fragile state. It will most likely remain in place as a lasting memorial to the most dramatic oceanic tragedy on record.
Here is a video of the German sub hypothesis:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHKlrpzqhSg
Premonitions of the Titanic’s sinking:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsVOJ8M9xkc
Did a missing key sink the Titanic?:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddCD014gvj4&noredirect=1
Prophecies concerning the Titanic:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEjuakf2ZzQ
REVIEW https://history.house.gov/Blog/2014/April/4-15-Titanic/
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/08/federal-reserve.asp
Gold
Durante los Acuerdos de Bretton Woods, se decidió adoptar el dólar estadounidense como divisa internacional, bajo la condición de que la Reserva Federal (el banco central de ese país) sostuviera el patrón oro pero a partir de 1971 el mismo se quiebra definitivamente; por lo que el dólar se convirtió de facto en una moneda fíat respaldada por una imposición gubernamental estadounidense y sin valor intrínseco, pero con un valor legal propio.
En 1971, como consecuencia de un déficit comercial y un enorme gasto bélico con motivo de la participación estadounidense en la Guerra de Vietnam, el entonces presidente Richard Nixon impuso un shock económico en el cual se suspendió definitivamente la convertibilidad directa del dólar respecto al oro. Esto significó que Estados Unidos abandonara el patrón oro, por lo que desde entonces, el valor de la divisa estadounidense se sostendría, exclusivamente en una imposición legal del gobierno estadounidense, bajo la forma de una moneda fíat (o dinero por decreto); visión criticada por Don Patinkin y por parte del marxismo que considera al dinero materializado de facto, en los mercados (como activo financiero) y reconocido por los estados, los cuales acumulan cuantiosas reservas de este metal.
Sharing is caringFacebookX / TwitterLinkedInWhatsAppTelegramRedditEmail3733 words · 134 views