Sucharit Bhakdi

¿Qué tienen en común la penicilina, la aspirina y la ivermectina? Además de rimar, los tres pertenecen al selecto grupo de fármacos que pueden presumir de haber tenido el mayor impacto benéfico sobre la salud y bienestar de la humanidad.

Tienen por lo menos dos otras cosas en común: los tres son de origen natural y los tres condujeron a un premio Nobel. La aspirina es un derivado de la salicina, un compuesto que se encuentra en una variedad de plantas incluyendo el sauce. Aunque Hipócrates ya habla de su uso en el 400 BC, no se aisló hasta el 1829 como ácido salicílico y se sintetizó unos años más tarde como ácido acetilsalicílico. El descubrimiento de sus mecanismos de acción le mereció a Sir John Vane el premio Nobel en 1982. La penicilina se aisló a partir de un hongo que creció por accidente en una placa de Petri en el laboratorio de Alexander Fleming. Su descubrimiento cambió radicalmente el curso de la medicina y le dio a Fleming el premio Nobel en 1945, junto con Howard Florey y Ernst Chain.

Y esto nos trae a la ivermectina –un fármaco que seguramente no forma parte de nuestro botiquín, como la aspirina o la penicilina, pero que ciertamente ha mejorado la vida de millones de personas desde su descubrimiento en 1975.

La historia de cómo se descubrió la ivermectina es bastante increíble. A finales de los 60, Satoshi Ōmura, un microbiólogo del Instituto Kitasako de Tokyo, empezó a coleccionar miles de muestras de suelo de todo Japón, a la búsqueda de compuestos antibacterianos. Cultivaba bacterias provenientes de las muestras, identificaba los cultivos con potencial médico, y las enviaba a 10.000 km de distancia a los laboratorios Merck en New Jersey, donde su colaborador William Campbell probaba su efecto contra lombrices parasitarias que afectan al ganado y otros animales. Un cultivo proveniente de una muestra recogida cerca de un campo de golf al sur de Tokyo mostró un efecto notable contra las lombrices. La bacteria en el cultivo resultó ser una nueva especie, que bautizaron como Streptomyces avermictilis. El compuesto activo, llamado avermectina, fue modificado químicamente para aumentar su actividad y seguridad. El nuevo compuesto, llamado ivermectina, se comercializó para uso animal en 1981 y pronto se convirtió en uno de los fármacos veterinarios [y humano] más vendidos en el mundo. Es extraordinario que, a pesar de décadas de búsqueda, S. avermictilis siga siendo la única fuente de avermectina que se ha encontrado.

A Myth is Born: How CDC, FDA, and Media Wove a Web of Ivermectin Lies That Outlives The Truth
New Mexico officials admit they were wrong: Two people died from covid. NOT from ivermectin. Yet the CDC generated the nation’s highest health alert and a thousand fake headlines on false cases.
Linda Bonvie and Mary Beth Pfeiffer https://rescue.substack.com/p/a-myth-is-born-how-cdc-fda-and-media

El limoneno es una sustancia natural que se extrae del aceite de las cáscaras de los cítricos y que da el olor característico a los mismos. Pertenece al grupo de los terpenos, en concreto a de los limonoides, que constituyen una de las más amplias clases de alimentos funcionales y fitonutrientes, funcionando como antioxidantes.

Posee un carbono asimétrico como estereocentro. Por tanto, existen dos isómeros ópticos: R-limoneno y S-limoneno , el segundo también conocido como L-limoneno (antiguamente, dextro y levo, respectivamente).

Odontólogo colombiano creó un enjuague bucal que asegura que destruye el 99,9% del coronavirus

El producto contiene D-limoneno, una sustancia extraída de la cáscara de los cítricos y CPC (cloruro cetilpiridinio) y esta logra romper la membrana del SARS-CoV-2. 19 de Enero de 2022 El coinventor del enjuague que neutraliza el 99.9% del COVID es colombiano. El odontólogo y rehabilitador oral, Enrique Jadad Bechara fue una de las personas más importantes en el desarrollo de este enjuague bucal. Foto: Organización Dr. Enrique Jadad Bechara https://www.infobae.com/america/colombia/2022/01/19/odontologo-colombiano-creo-un-enjuague-bucal-que-asegura-que-destruye-el-999-del-coronavirus/

Friedrich von Knauss (7 de febrero de 1724, Aldingen en Ludwigsburg—14 de agosto de 1789, Viena) fue relojero e inventor alemán que construyó mecanismos de relojería capaces, de manera elemental, de tocar instrumentos musicales, escribir frases cortas o realizar otras tareas individuales especializadas. Su padre, Ludwig Knauss, también fue relojero. Friedrich tuvo un hermano, Ludwig Johann, cuyo año de nacimiento se supone debe haber sido 1715 o 1716.

The writing hand is a mechanical automaton created by Friedrich von Knauss in 1764.^[1][2] A clockwork mechanism moves a hand which dips a pen into an inkstand and writes the phrase “Huic Domui Deus / Nec metas rerum / Nec tempora ponat” (“May God not impose ends or deadlines on this house”) on a small card.^[3] On the silver-coating of the mechanism are the words “Pro patria”.

1. Moritsch, Otmar. “All-writing miraculous machine: writing apparatus”. Technisches Museum Wien. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
2. ^ Adelheid Voskuhl (31 May 2013). Androids in the Enlightenment: Mechanics, Artisans, and Cultures of the Self. University of Chicago Press. pp. 31–2. ISBN 978-0-226-03402-7.
3. ^ Erkki Huhtamo; Jussi Parikka (16 June 2011). Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications. University of California Press. p. 84. ISBN 978-0-520-94851-8.

Autómata (del latínautomăta y este del griego αὐτόματος autómatos, ‘espontáneo’ o ‘con movimiento propio’. Según la RAE, «máquina que imita la figura y los movimientos de un ser animado»)^[1]​ es un equivalente tecnológico de lo que en la actualidad serían los robots autónomos. Si el robot es antropomorfo se conoce como androide.^[2]

1.  «Autómata, Real Academia Española».
2. ↑ «Androide, Diccionario Wordreference». Consultado el 21 de septiembre de 2015.

REVIEW Históricamente los primeros autómatas se remontan a la prehistoria, cuando las estatuas de algunos de dioses o reyes despedían fuego de los ojos, como era el caso de una estatua de Osiris. Otras tenían brazos mecánicos operados por los sacerdotes del templo, y otras, como la de Memon de Etiopía, emitían sonidos cuando los rayos del sol las iluminaba, y así infundían temor y respeto a quien las contemplara.

Esta finalidad religiosa de los autómatas continuó hasta la Grecia clásica, en la que se hicieron estatuas que se movían con energía hidráulica. Esos nuevos conocimientos quedan plasmados en el primer libro sobre la figura de los robots Autómata, escrito por Herón de Alejandría (10 d. C.-70 d. C.) donde se explica la creación de mecanismos, muchos basados en los principios de Filón o Arquímedes, realizados fundamentalmente como entretenimiento y que imitaban el movimiento, como el de aves que gorjeaban, volaban y bebían, estatuas que servían vino o puertas automáticas, todos producidos por el movimiento del agua, la gravedad o por sistemas de palancas. También cabe destacar su “The Automaton Theatre”, sobre su teatro de marionetas mecánicas que representaban la Guerra de Troya.

Aunque Herón es el primero en recopilar datos sobre los autómatas, otros anteriores a él realizaron aportaciones, como es el caso de Archytas (428 a. C.-347 a. C.), inventor del tornillo y la polea y famoso por su paloma mecánica capaz de volar gracias a vapor de aire en propulsión. O el terrible sistema descrito por Polibio (200 a. C.-118 a. C.) y utilizado por Nabis, tirano de Esparta, que consistía en un artilugio con forma de mujer con clavos en su pecho y brazos y que abrazaba mortalmente a todo aquel que incumplía sus pagos.

READ Karana Mudra

Vitarkamudra en pintura mural en Bezeklik, Cuenca del Tarim, siglo IX.

The earliest known manual alphabet, described by the Benedictine monk Bede in 8th century Northumbria, did just that.^[14] While the usual purpose of the Latin and Greek finger alphabets described by Bede is unknown, they were unlikely to have been used by deaf people for communication — even though Bede lost his own hearing later in life. Historian Lois Bragg concludes that these alphabets were “only a bookish game.”^[15]

1.  Bede. (AD 710). De Computo vel Loguela per Gestum Digitorum (“Of counting or speaking with the fingers”), preface to De temporum ratione (“On the reckoning of time”). Illustrated in AD 1140, National Library, Madrid.
2. ^ Bragg, Lois (1997). Visual-Kinetic Communication in Europe Before 1600: A Survey of Sign Lexicons and Finger Alphabets Prior to the Rise of Deaf Education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2:1 Winter 1997

Yes sound wave can travel longitudinally in plasma state of matter. Plasma state is basically electron breaking stage at very high temperature so it’s still a gas through which light and sound wave can travel. … Yes sound wave do propagate through this.22 nov 2018https://www.topperlearning.com › s… sound can travel in solid air and gas but can it travel in plasma and bose …

Unen pensamientos para justificar

Sucharit Bhakdi (สุจริต ภักดี [sut̚˨˩.t͡ɕa˨˩.rit̚˨˩ pʰak̚˦˥.diː˧]; born Sucharit Punyaratabandhu, สุจริต บุณยรัตพันธุ์, 1 November 1946, in Washington, D.C.)

[he claimed] that the pandemic was “fake” and that COVID-19 vaccines were going to decimate the world’s population.^[3][2]

1. Muriel Kalisch; Patrick Stotz (21 May 2020). “Hinter der Verschwörung” [Behind the plot]. Der Spiegel (in German).
2. ^ ^a b Daniel Funke (30 April 2021). “Fact check: COVID-19 vaccines don’t cause death, won’t decimate world’s population”. USA Today.

Bhakdi’s parents are Thai diplomats.^[7] In an interview, Bhakdi stated that his mother studied at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.^[8]

Bhakdi studied at the Universities of Bonn, Gießen, Mainz and Copenhagen, and at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology in Freiburg.^[4]

He studied medicine at the University of Bonn from 1963 to 1970, during part of which (from 1966 to 1970) he was a scholarship holder of the German Academic Exchange Service.^[9] Bhakdi worked for a while as a private assistant to the internal medicine specialist Walter Siegenthaler [de].^[8] In February 1971 he received his doctorate in medicine. From 1972 to 1978, he studied at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology in Freiburg on scholarships from the Max Planck Society at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology in Freiburg and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.^[4]

He worked at the University of Copenhagen for a year before moving to the Institute of Medical Microbiology at the Justus Liebig University in Gießen, where he worked from 1977 to 1990. In July 1979 he habilitated.

1. “Sucharit Bhakdi (Punyarataband) Lebenslauf” [curriculum vitae]. studylibde.com. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
2. ^ ^a b Universität distanziert sich von Corona-Kritiker Bhakdi (tr. “University distances itself from Corona critic Bhakdi”) 2 November 2020 www.swr.de Accessed 4 December 2020
3. ^ ^a b Algemeiner, The (16 July 2021). “Jews ‘Learned Evil’ From Nazis: Leading COVID-19 Conspiracy Theorist in Germany Loses Publisher Over Antisemitic Comments”. Algemeiner.com. Retrieved 26 July 2021.
4. ^ “Sucharit Bhakdi]”. goldegg-verlag.com, Goldegg Verlag. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
5. ^ ^a b “Weltwoche: “Gefährliche Verführungen”” [Dangerous seductions]. www.weltwoche.ch. 6 May 2020. Retrieved 14 May 2020. His mother, who had studied at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, inspired him early in medicine. «She was an excellent doctor,» says Bhakdi.
6. ^ ^a b c “Gestern Stipendiatin – und heute? Sucharit Bhakdi – Leiter des Instituts für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz” [Yesterday scholarship holder – and today? Sucharit Bhakdi – Head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.]. DAAD, March 2006 (archive). Retrieved 2 December 2021.

Bhakdi was appointed C2 professor at Gießen in 1982. He spent a further year in Copenhagen and became C3 professor of medical microbiology (at Gießen again) in 1987 before being appointed to the University of Mainz in 1990. From 1991 he headed the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene as a C4 professor.^[4]

Bhakdi retired on 1 April 2012.^[10] Since 2016 he has been a visiting scholar at the University of Kiel.^[11][12][13]

Prior to his retirement, Bhakdi produced scientific work in the fields of bacteriology and atherosclerosis, and published multiple scientific articles in these areas.^[14]

Research career

The immune system

From 1972, Bhakdi researched the functioning of the body’s non-specific defenses at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology in Freiburg. He contributed to a better understanding of the mechanisms with which the large molecules of the complement system in the blood render exogenous substances harmless.^[9] In 1978 Bhakdi discovered a protein that attacks and damages cells by sinking into the cell membrane, resulting in the formation of a pore (see membrane attack complex).^[15] This was the enforcer molecule of the complement system, which is formed on the surface of foreign cells as a result of a chain reaction involving the immune system. This was followed by the discovery that bacteria, in turn, can also produce pore-forming proteins.^[16] Today it is known that the vast majority of pathogenic bacteria produce pore formers that damage host cells. In 1984 the Royal Society in London invited Bhakdi to present the concept of cell membrane damage by pore formers.^[17] From then on, Bhakdi concentrated on research on this topic.^[18]

Atherosclerosis

Investigation of the complement system led Bhakdi to the area of atherosclerosis. In 1989 he discovered through animal experiments that the complement component 5 is activated in the vessel walls where low density lipoprotein (LDL) is deposited.^[19]

According to current understanding, atherosclerosis is a polygenic disease caused by a complex interplay of several environmental and genetic factors, especially cholesterol. This is transported in the blood via LDL and absorbed by the cells that need it via cellular receptors. However, it can accumulate in the blood vessel walls during transport and oxidize there or even beforehand. This attracts monocytes, which take up the oxidized LDL and turn into “foam cells“. These then trigger chronic inflammatory reactions that damage the vascular wall.

In 1998, Bhakdi and his team of colleagues put forward the “Mainz hypothesis” that atherosclerosis is only caused monocausally by the lack of removal of LDL.^[20] According to Bhakdi’s hypothesis, LDL is generally not oxidized, but cholesterol is also absorbed by monocytes and foam cells are formed. However, the high density lipoprotein (HDL) can remove cholesterol again. If, however, a certain amount of LDL accumulates locally on the vascular wall and cannot be removed, part of the immune system causes inflammatory reactions that lead to atherosclerosis. In this way, early-stage atherosclerosis could be reversed if the LDL blood level (and blood pressure) was lowered and the HDL level increased.^[21] Bhakdi’s hypothesis, however, is not reflected in current opinion.^[20]

Memberships and functions

• Member of the Collaborative Research Centres of the German Research Foundation “Proteins as Tools in Biology” at the University of Giessen (1987-1990),
• Deputy Spokesperson of the Collaborative Research Center “Immunopathogenesis” (1990-1999)
• Spokesperson of the Collaborative Research Center “490 Infection and Persistence in Infections” in Mainz (2000-2011).^[9]
• Co-founder and board member of the Association of Physicians and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy, which was founded in May 2020 and lost its non-profit status in October 2020.^[22] The purpose of the association is to take action against the German government’s measures to contain the corona pandemic.^[12]

In autumn 2020 he was one of the first signatories of the “appeal for free debating spaces” (Appell für freie Debattenräume [de], a German adaptation of the project “A Letter on Justice and Open Debate” by the American Thomas C. Williams, which was previously launched in the USA.).^[23]

He was Editor in Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology from 1990 to 2012.^[24]

1. “Neu bei uns. (PDF)” [New to us] (PDF). www.unimedizin-mainz.de. September 2013. p. 18. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
2. ^ “Meinungen am Rande des Mainstreams” [Opinions on the margins of the mainstream Pharmazeutische Zeitung]. www.pharmazeutische-zeitung.de. 30 March 2020. Retrieved 9 August 2020.
3. ^ ^a b Rohwedder, Wulf (10 August 2020). “Zweierlei Maß bei “Corona-Rebellen”” [Double standards in Corona rebels”]. tagesschau.de. Retrieved 26 August 2020.
4. ^ Schwenke, Karen (8 August 2020). “”Wir wollen zum Denken anregen” – Zwei Kieler Forscher stellen sich gegen alle anerkannten Corona-Experten. Ihr Buch ist ein Bestseller (Paywall)” [“We want to inspire people to think” – Two Kiel researchers stand against all recognized Corona experts. Their book is a bestseller (Interview in den Kieler Nachrichten)].
5. ^ “Scopus preview – Bhakdi, Sucharit – Author details – Scopus”. www.scopus.com. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
6. ^ S. Bhakdi, J. Tranum-Jensen: Molecular nature of the complement lesion. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Band 75, Nr. 11, November 1978, ISSN 0027-8424, S. 5655–5659, DOI 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5655, PMID 281714.
7. ^ R. Füssle, S. Bhakdi, A. Sziegoleit, J. Tranum-Jensen, T. Kranz: On the mechanism of membrane damage by Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin. In: The Journal of Cell Biology, Band 91, Nr. 1, Oktober 1981, ISSN 0021-9525, S. 83–94, DOI 10.1083/jcb.91.1.83, PMC 2111936, PMID 6271794.
8. ^ S. Bhakdi, J. Tranum-Jensen, C. A. Pasternak, K. J. Micklem, Rodney Robert Porter: Mechanism of complement cytolysis and the concept of channel-forming proteins. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, Band 306, Nr. 1129, 6. September 1984, S. 311–324, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1984.0092.
9. ^ S. Bhakdi, J. Tranum-Jensen: Damage to mammalian cells by proteins that form transmembrane pores. In: Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Band 107, 1987, ISSN 0303-4240, S. 147–223, DOI 10.1007/bfb0027646, PMID 3303271.
10. ^ P. S. Seifert, F. Hugo, G. K. Hansson, S. Bhakdi: Perilesional complement activation in experimental atherosclerosis. Terminal C5b-9 complement deposition coincides with cholesterol accumulation in the aortic intima of hypercholesterolemic rabbits. In: Laboratory Investigation; a Journal of Technical Methods and Pathology, Band 60, Nr. 6, Juni 1989, ISSN 0023-6837, S. 747–754, PMID 2659887.
11. ^ ^a b “Atherosklerose: Verschiedene Hypothesen, ähnliche Empfehlungen” [Atherosclerosis: Different hypotheses, similar recommendations]. Pharmazeutische Zeitung. 16 February 2010. Retrieved 2 December 2021.
12. ^ Uhl, Doris (4 February 2010). “„Die Atherosklerose ist eine besiegte Krankheit!”” [Atherosclerosis is a defeated disease!]. Deutsche Apothekerzeitung. Retrieved 2 December 2021.
13. ^ Lars Wienand: Corona-Verein von Sucharit Bhakdi verliert Gemeinnützigkeit (tr. “Corona Association of Sucharit Bhakdi loses non-profit”) www.t-online.de accessed 5 November 2020
14. ^ “Erstunterzeichner” [“First signatory”]. idw-europe.org. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
15. ^ “Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Springer”. www.springer.com. Retrieved 20 October 2020.

• 1979 Justus Liebig University Giessen Prize^[58]
• 1980 Konstanz Medicine Prize^[58]
• 1987 German Society for Microbiology Prize [de]^[59]
• 1988 Dr. Friedrich Sasse Prize^[58]
• 1989 Ludwig Schunk Prize for Medicine^[58]
• 1989 Robert-Koch-Förderpreis of Clausthal-Zellerfeld^[60]
• 1991 Gay-Lussac Humboldt Prize^[61]
• 2001 Aronson Prize for „wegweisende Arbeiten auf dem Gebiet des Komplementsystems und bakterieller Toxine“ tr. “pioneering work in the field of the complement system and bacterial toxins”^[62][63]
• 2005 H. W. Hauss Award^[64]
• 2005 Verdienstorden des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz^[65]
• 2009 Rudolf-Schönheimer Medal of the German Society for Arteriosclerosis Research [de]^[66][67]

1. Institutsgeschichte Geschichte des Institutes für Medizinische Mikrobiologie in Gießen (bis zum Jahr 2000) tr. History of the Institute History of the Institute of Medical Microbiology in Gießen (until 2000) www.ukgm.de, accessed 25 November 2020
2. ^ Hauptpreis. PreisträgerInnen tr. Main Prize. Prize winners www.dghm.org, accessed 25 November 2020
3. ^ Förderpreis der Stadt Clausthal-Zellerfeld www.robert-koch-stiftung.de, accessed 25 November 2020
4. ^ Liste der Preisträger des Gay-Lussac-Humboldt-Preis (PDF; 82 kB)
5. ^ “Mainzer Universitätsprofessor Sucharit Bhakdi wird mit dem Aronson-Preis 2001 ausgezeichnet” [Mainz university professor Sucharit Bhakdi is awarded the Aronson Prize 2001]. www.uni-protokolle.de.
6. ^ Petra Giegerich (29 November 2002). “Mainzer Universitätsprofessor Sucharit Bhakdi wird mit dem Aronson-Preis 2001 ausgezeichnet” (in German).
7. ^ “Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D.” Universität Mainz. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
8. ^ “Sucharit Bhakdi MD”. chelsea green. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
9. ^ Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (20 April 2009). “Mainzer Mediziner Bhakdi für Hypothese zur Entstehung von Atherosklerose ausgezeichnet” [Mainz physician Bhakdi honored for hypothesis on the development of atherosclerosis]. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
10. ^ Deutsches Ärzteblatt. Namen und Nachrichten [Names and messages]. Retrieved 16 April 2018.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Bhakdi started a YouTube channel proposing that the number of deaths stemming from SARS-CoV-2 infection had been overstated. In November 2020 his account was terminated for violating YouTube’s community guidelines.^[25] One of his first videos was published 18 March 2020; it went viral, with 300,000 views by 23 March.^[26] In the video, he predicted the worst “horror scenario” would be a million infections and 30 deaths a day in Germany, and that death rates in Northern Italy and China were higher only because of high air pollution there (even though Germany typically has more deaths due to pollution than Italy).

Bhakdi has made a number of false statements about the COVID-19 pandemic, saying that the pandemic is a “fake”, that face masks and quarantines are “nonsense” and that the COVID-19 vaccines are deadly and will decimate the global population.^[3]

He has been otherwise criticised for his theses on the COVID-19 pandemic; according to Medical Tribune [de], they are considered unscientific by a majority of experts.^[27]

Bhakdi’s criticisms of the COVID-19 pandemic response

His criticisms of states’ (most particularly Germany’s) reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic have included:

• Writing an open Letter in March 2020 to German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel regarding the “socio-economic consequences of the drastic containment measures which are currently being applied in large parts of Europe”^[28]
• Posting videos on YouTube claiming, for example, that the government was overreacting because the virus posed no more threat than influenza, and that any COVID-19 vaccine would be “pointless”.^[29]
• Participation in May 2020 in the writing of a “position paper of the BMI” by an employee of the German crisis management department.^[30][31][32] The Federal Ministry distanced itself from the position, calling the paper a “private opinion” circulating on official letterhead, and released the chief government councilor Stephan Kohn from duty.^[33]
• He is the co-author of Corona, False Alarm? Facts and Figures (2020), German: (‘Corona Fehlalarm?’) ISBN 978-3-99060-191-4^[34][35] and Corona Unmasked. Neue Daten, Zahlen, Hintergründe. (Goldegg, Berlin/Wien 2021, ISBN 978-3-99060-231-7. An earlier book of his was published in 2016, Schreckgespenst Infektionen – Mythen, Wahn und Wirklichkeit (tr. “Bogeyman Infections – Myths, Delusions and Reality”) ISBN 978-3-903090-66-8.^[36] He published these books together with his wife, Karina Reiss [de], a biologist and biochemist at the Quincke Research Center, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel.^[37]
• Describing Germany in December 2020 as a “health dictatorship”, saying he wanted to emigrate to Thailand because of this.^[38]

1. Schmerer, Kai (28 November 2020). “COVID-19: Youtube sperrt zahlreiche Videos und Konten von Regierungskritikern” [COVID-19: YouTube blocks numerous videos and accounts of government critics]. ZDNet. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
2. ^ ^a b c Metzger, Nils (23 March 2020). “Corona-Faktencheck: Warum Sucharit Bhakdis Zahlen falsch sind”. Startseite – ZDFmediathek (in German). Retrieved 27 September 2021.
3. ^ “Wenn Ärzte von der Coronakrise als einer „kriminellen Inszenierung” sprechen” [When doctors speak of the corona crisis as a “criminal act”]. www.medical-tribune.de. 22 July 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2020. Die Thesen von Prof. Bhakdi, emeritierter Professor für Mikrobiologie der Uni Mainz, werden von der übergroßen Mehrheit der Experten unwissenschaftlich genannt, denen des ehemaligen Lungenfacharztes Dr. Wodarg wird gleichermaßen widersprochen.” tr. “The Theses of Prof. Bhakdi, professor emeritus of microbiology at the University of Mainz, is called unscientific by the vast majority of experts, those of the former lung specialist Dr. Wodarg are equally contradicted.
4. ^ ^a b Stumpfe, Miriam (3 April 2020). “Bhakdis Brief an die Kanzlerin – Was ist dran an seinen Fragen?”. BR24 (in German). Retrieved 27 September 2021.
5. ^ ^a b c Kathrin Wesolowski (19 June 2020). “Impfung gegen Covid-19 “sinnlos”? Sucharit Bhakdi stellt unbelegte Behauptungen auf” [Vaccination against Covid-19 “pointless”? Sucharit Bhakdi makes unfounded claims]. Correctiv (Fact check) (in German).
6. ^ Julia Sextl (13 May 2020). “Brisantes Corona-Papier: War das alles richtig so?” [Explosive Corona paper: was it all right?]. Abendzeitung. Retrieved 16 May 2020.
7. ^ Stephan Kohn (2020). “KM4 Analyse des Krisenmanagements (Kurzfassung)” [KM4 analysis of crisis management (short version)] (PDF). Stephan Kohn / Abendzeitung. Retrieved 16 May 2020.
8. ^ Sucharit Bhakdi, Gunter Frank, Gunnar Heinsohn, Stefan W. Hockertz, Karina Reiß, Peter Schirmacher, Andreas Sönnichsen, Till Uebel, Harald Walach / Abendzeitung (11 May 2020). “Gemeinsame Pressemitteilung der Experten des Corona-Papiers aus dem Bundesministerium des Innern” [Joint press release by the experts on the Corona paper from the Federal Ministry of the Interior] (PDF). Retrieved 16 May 2020.
9. ^ Benjamin Reuter (14 May 2020). “Wie der angebliche Corona-Geheimreport im Innenministerium entstand” [How the alleged Corona secret report in the Interior Ministry was created]. Der Tagesspiegel. Retrieved 16 May 2020.
10. ^ Bhakdi, Sucharit; Reiss, Karina. Corona Fehlalarm? Zahlen, Daten und Hintergründe [Corona false alarm? Numbers, dates and backgrounds]. www.goldegg-verlag.com. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
11. ^ “buchreport, Corona Fehlalarm?” [Bookreport, ‘Corona Fehlalarm?’]. www.buchreport.de. Retrieved 4 July 2020.
12. ^ Bhakdi, Sucharit; Reiss, Karina (April 2020). Schreckgespenst Infektionen – Mythen, Wahn und Wirklichkeit [Bogey Infections – Myths, Delusions and Reality]. www.goldegg-verlag.com. ISBN 9783903090668. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
13. ^ “Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Karina Reiß”. www.uni-kiel.de. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
14. ^ “Bhakdi will aus “Diktatur” Deutschland nach Thailand auswandern, wo Covid-Fakes bestraft werden”. Volksverpetzer (in German). 31 January 2021. Retrieved 26 July 2021.

The award Das Goldene Brett vorm Kopf (English translation: “The Golden Blockhead“, literal translation “The Golden Board in Front of the Head“) is a negative prize awarded by the Society for the Scientific Investigation of Pseudosciences (GWUP – Gesellschaft zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung von Parawissenschaften).

Sharing is caringFacebookX / TwitterLinkedInWhatsAppTelegramRedditEmail4600 words · 164 views