Daily mail

“He is a California-born doctor who pioneered mRNA vaccines. He describes himself as a carpenter and farmhand from California, who began to study science and became a pioneer in mRNA vaccine technology.” This is an intentional gross misrepresentation of my qualifications, which are readily available (including the issued mRNA and DNA vaccine patents) at

Google Scholar https://www.rwmalonemd.com/general-4 ,

Original data, notes, patents, early papers, lab notes, meeting notes, patent disclosures and more labbooks, disclosures here.

and attached documents: RW Malone, MD Bio sketch, and RW Malone MD, CV

3) This quote is inaccurate; “’I was the guy that first acquired (hydroxychloroquine) because I had Chinese connections,’ Malone told Rogan.” What I said was that I was the first to acquire the treatment protocol from China. Relating to this, video documentation of the efforts of BARDA Director Dr. Rick Bright and acting FDA director Dr. Janet Woodcock to suppress outpatient access to Hydroxychloroquine .

4) Regarding the activity of both Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, I refer Ms. Alexander to the excellent summary developed by the Attorney General of the State of Nebraska concerning this topic. This recent paper on the use of ivermectin is also useful.

5) A summary of the studies demonstrating that natural immunity is superior to vaccine induced immunity

6) “There have been isolated reports of deaths being initially misclassified, but no evidence of widespread falsification of data, as claimed by Malone.” This is a false statement, and represents hearsay not supported by evidence from Ms. Alexander. In contrast, the CDC and Dr. Deborah Birx has acknowledged this misclassification, which represents widespread falsification of deaths due to COVID-19. Evidence of data falsification by DoD concerning these data ( https://rumble.com/vtiqyu-leaked-database-shows-u.s.-military-disease-skyrocketing-after-covid-19-ino.html ) is pending and will be released shortly.

7) Regarding the incidence of hospitalized myocarditis in adolescents, the most comprehensive study is titled “Epidemiology of Acute Myocarditis/Pericarditis in Hong Kong Adolescents Following Comirnaty Vaccination”, and indeed demonstrates an incidence of approximately 1 in 2700 in boys. This study can be found here But if one wishes to pursue SOME of the other adverse events of these vaccines, here are many more peer reviewed references.

8) “While there is a legal gray area for mandating vaccines authorized for emergency use, businesses, employers and state governments generally have the power to require vaccination, experts say.” This statement is readily demonstrated to be false, and represents unattributed hearsay. Multiple federal court and Supreme court cases have rejected the illegal Biden mandates, and multiple additional cases remain pending. @RWMaloneMD

⬇️⬇️Read more⬇️⬇️

Robert W Malone, MD:
⬆️⬆️Read the beginning of the article⬆️⬆️

9) “Psychology experts say there is no support for the ‘psychosis’ theory described by Malone.” Again, hearsay, and demonstrably false. One such “expert” cited by the associated press is actively involved in “nudging” the british population, and hearings are currently in progress in Great Britian concerning this. The academic research concerned has now been published by Professor Dr. Mattias Desmet in his book “The Psychology of Totalitarianism” (De Psychologie van Totalitarisme, in Dutch, English translation in progress). This scholarly work is built on over 200 years of academic work. Please also read this post on mass formation, which has many references embedded in the text.

10) “There is no data to support his assertion that the vaccine is killing more adults than it saves.” Undocumented hearsay. There are multiple studies, not the least of which include the growing body of actuarial evidence and the recent DoD data from the DMED database provided by DoD employee whistleblowers. It is important to remember that one must use age stratification tables when looking at this data. How many young, healthy, normal lives have been lost, compared to how many elderly and obese lives saved?

11) “’It’s not just Ivermectin, its hydroxychloroquine,’ Malone told Rogan.’And just to put a marker on that, there are good modeling studies that probably half-a-million excess deaths have happened in the United States through the intentional blockade of early treatment by the U.S. government.’ @RWMaloneMD

⬇️⬇️Read more⬇️⬇️

⬆️⬆️Read the beginning of the article⬆️⬆️

Further regarding the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin and the excess lives lost, the following Executive Summary of Central Facts and Claims from an ongoing legal case provides a nice overview concerning the excess deaths:

• As of mid-July 2021, COVID-19 has caused over 5.6 million hospitalizations and an estimated 600,000 deaths in the United States.
• According to overwhelming data from dozens of studies and real-world use, attested to by world-leading, Nobel Prize-winning scientists and physicians, the widespread deployment of two inexpensive and extraordinarily safe medicines, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, in combination with other readily-accessible drugs, would have reduced U.S. COVID hospitalizations by 87.6% (https://www.ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/1100) mortality by 74.9% (same reference ).
• Among these world-leading scientists are Drs. Peter McCullough, Pierre Kory, Robert Malone and Harvey Risch, all of whom are widely-published, widely-respected, highly-credentialed experts in their fields, and all of whom have agreed to serve as experts in this litigation. We have also retained Dr. Joel Hay, an expert in health economics specializing in the pharmaceutical industry, to calculate the damages incurred by the State of Florida and other States as a result of the failure to prescribe these medicines.
• Every one of these scientific experts will testify and confirm that millions of hospitalizations and roughly 75%, or 450,000, of the estimated 600,000 COVID deaths, would have been averted if hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin had been widely deployed to combat the pandemic.
• Deploying these safe and effective drugs would, however, have thwarted the rollout of COVID vaccines. As a matter of express statutory law under 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(c)(3), COVID vaccines could not have received Emergency Use Authorizations, which they needed in order to be administered to the public, if there existed any “adequate, approved, and available alternative” for “preventing or treating” COVID.
• As a result, parties with vested interests in the vaccines, which have already garnered billions of dollars in federal funding and generated tens of billions of dollars in personal wealth for vaccine investors, waged a systematic, deceptive, fraudulent, yet highly effective campaign to discredit hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as COVID treatments and to prevent them from being widely used to combat the pandemic.
• This fraudulent campaign included:
• a. the knowing publication of false data (later retracted) in prestigious medical journals;
• b. the deceptive construction of designed-to-fail studies purportedly showing these medicines to be unsafe or ineffective in treating and preventing COVID;
• c. the fraudulent, deliberate censoring of truthful information concerning these medicines by social media companies whose CEOs have massive financial interests in vaccine development; and
• d. the issuance of unfounded, false or misleading directives by federal agencies, some of which—such as NIH, which is a co-owner of the Moderna vaccine despite its central role in the vaccine-approval process—also had a direct monetary interest in the vaccines. @RWMaloneMD

⬇️⬇️Read more⬇️⬇️

⬆️⬆️Read the beginning of the article⬆️⬆️

• Every one of the above-listed acts is a matter of public record, not open to serious dispute.
• The fraudulent campaign to thwart the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin involved numerous acts of wire fraud, which together clearly establish a pattern of racketeering activity under the RICO statute, which triggers treble damages under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c).
• Among the private parties complicit in this fraudulent campaign were the manufacturers of the U.S.-authorized COVID vaccines—Moderna, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson—as well as Merck, Bill Gates, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Glaxo Smith Kline, the Wellcome Trust, and major social media platforms, prominently including Facebook (whose CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, holds massive financial interests in for-profit vaccine companies), all of whom will potentially be named as defendants. Other complicit individuals include numerous governmental officials, including White House medical advisor and NIAID Director Anthony Fauci, FDA Acting Director Janet Woodcock, former Director of Operation Warp Speed Moncef Slaoui, and Rick Bright, former Director of Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), who will not be defendants due to governmental immunity doctrines but who will be named as willing co-conspirators.
• Like the fraudulent and deceptive campaign to cover up the addictive and carcinogenic effects of nicotine, the fraudulent and deceptive campaign to suppress hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as COVID treatments not only led to hideous numbers of unnecessary hospitalizations and deaths, but unlawfully caused states to incur billions of dollars in health care costs through Medicaid and Medicare.
• For example, according to our expert economist’s preliminary analysis, as a result of the fraudulent suppression of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the State of Florida has already suffered approximately $5.6 billion in damages for health care costs incurred in treating ill or dying Medicare and CHIP-covered individuals. A treble damage award under RICO would increase this figure to $16.8 billion, and this omits consequential damages such as lost tax revenue.
• History will record the failure to use hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin against the pandemic as one of the greatest tragedies and crimes of our era. This lawsuit will be a first step toward holding accountable those who were responsible and forcing them to pay for a small part of the havoc they wreaked.

It is disappointing that the Daily Mail substitutes disinformation and hearsay for actual medical data and established fact in this publication. Spreading medical disinformation endangers patient lives. In the future, the Daily Mail would be better served by employing experienced medical writers when reviewing information provided by highly qualified medical and scientific experts.

Dr. Robert W. Malone

?Follow and Share??
?? @RWMaloneMD

John P. A. Ioannidis (Nueva York, 21 de agosto de 1965) es un médico-científico y escritor grecoestadounidense que ha realizado contribuciones en medicina basada en hechos, epidemiología, ciencia de datos e investigación clínica. Además, ha sido pionero en el campo de la meta-investigación (investigación sobre la investigación). Ioannidis ha demostrado que gran parte de la investigación publicada no cumple con buenos estándares científicos de evidencia.

Ioannidis estudia la investigación científica en sí misma, especialmente en medicina clínica y ciencias sociales. Es uno de los científicos más citados en la literatura, y su artículo de 2005 «Por qué los hallazgos de investigación más publicados son falsos»^[1]​^[2]​ es el documento más descargado de la Public Library of Science, y en la plataforma de acceso abierto a publicaciones científicas Mendeley, Ioannidis cuenta con el mayor número de lectores en materia de ciencia.^[3]​

Ioannidis es profesor de medicina, investigación y políticas de salud, así como de ciencia de los datos biomédicos en la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad Stanford, y profesor de estadística en la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Universidad de Stanford. Es director del Centro de Investigación de Prevención de Stanford y codirector, junto con Steven N. Goodman, del Centro de Innovación en Meta-Investigación de Stanford (METRICS). ^[4]​^[5]​ También es el editor en jefe del European Journal of Clinical Investigation.^[6]​ Fue presidente del Departamento de Higiene y Epidemiología de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Ioannina y profesor adjunto de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Tufts.^[7]​ Fue presidente del Departamento de Higiene y Epidemiología, de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Ioánina, así como profesor adjunto en la Tufts University School of Medicine.^[8]​^[9]

1. Ioannidis, John P.A. (1 de agosto de 2005). «Why Most Published Research Findings Are False». PLoS Medicine 2 (8): 124. ISSN 1549-1277. PMC 1182327. PMID 16060722. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
2. ↑ «Highly Cited Researchers». Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2015.
3. ↑ Medicine – Stanford Prevention Research Center. John P.A. Ioannidis
4. ↑ «John P. A. Ioannidis». CAP Profiles. Stanford School of Medicine. Consultado el 24 de mayo de 2014.
5. ↑ «Prevention Research Center». Stanford School of Medicine. Consultado el 24 de mayo de 2014.
6. ↑ «John Ioannidis». Stanford. Archivado desde el original el 18 de mayo de 2018. Consultado el 18 de marzo de 2020.
7. ↑ «John Ioannidis». Stanford. Archivado desde el original el 18 de mayo de 2018. Consultado el 18 de marzo de 2020.
8. ↑ «John P.A. Ioannidis». Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine. Consultado el 31 de diciembre de 2008.
9. ↑ Ioannidis, John P.A.n. «Curriculum Vitae». Archivado desde el original el 21 de julio de 2011. Consultado el 4 de noviembre de 2010.

El profesor Ioannidis sobre la crisis producida con ocasión de la Pandemia de COVID-19 escribió un artículo para la publicación médica STAT, titulado: «¿Un fiasco en ciernes? A medida que la pandemia de coronavirus se afianza, estamos tomando decisiones sin datos confiables», en el cual cuestiona las medidas draconianas que se han tomado por los gobiernos, sin la debida evidencia científica, como el aislamiento social, o la cuarentena generalizada. En una de sus conclusiones, y a pesar de la falta de datos, logra formular una conclusión: «Uno de los temas de fondo es que no sabemos cuánto tiempo se pueden mantener las medidas de distanciamiento social y las cuarentenas, sin mayores consecuencias para la economía, la sociedad y la salud mental. Pueden surgir evoluciones impredecibles, incluyendo crisis financiera, disturbios, conflictos civiles, guerra y un colapso del tejido social. Como mínimo, necesitamos datos de prevalencia e incidencia imparciales sobre la carga infecciosa en evolución, para guiar la toma de decisiones».^[25]

​Ioannidis, John PA (17 de marzo de 2020). «A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data» (en inglés). Consultado el 18 de marzo de 2020. «La actual enfermedad por coronavirus, Covid-19, se ha calificado como una pandemia de esas que ocurren una vez en un siglo. Pero también puede ser un fiasco de evidencia de una vez en un siglo».

Didier Raoult (n. 13 de marzo de 1952, Dakar, África Occidental Francesa) es un infectólogo y microbiólogo francés. En 1984, Raoult creó la Unidad de Rickettsias en la Universidad de Aix-Marsella (UMA). También fue profesor de enfermedades infecciosas en la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Aix-Marsella. Desde 2008, Raoult es director de la Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes.

El 17 de marzo de 2020, Raoult anunció en un vídeo en línea que un ensayo en el que participaron 24 pacientes del sureste de Francia respaldaba la afirmación de que la hidroxicloroquina y la azitromicina eran eficaces en el tratamiento de la COVID-19.^[42]​ El 20 de marzo, publicó en línea un informe preliminar de su estudio en la revista International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents.^[43]

1. France, Connexion. «French researcher posts successful Covid-19 drug trial». connexionfrance.com. Consultado el 18 March 2020.
2. ↑ Gautret, Philippe et al. (20 March 2020). «Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial». International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 56 (1): 105949. PMC 7102549. PMID 32205204. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949. Parámetro desconocido |orig-year= ignorado (ayuda)

READ karina acevedo, helene panoun, Juan gervas

REVIEW roger hodkinson https://cs.uwaterloo.ca › Roge…PDFDr. Roger Hodkinson11 jun 2021 — He is in Good Standing with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, and has been recognized by the Court of Queen’s Bench in Alberta

REVIEW Dr. Roger Hodkinson, MA, MB (Cambridge UK), FCAP, FRCPC Executive Chairman Dr. Hodkinson is a broadly experienced clinical pathologist who holds medical degrees from Cambridge University in the United Kingdom. Prior to his association with MutantDx, he was the CEO of Stirrat Laboratories, a large retail diagnostic medical laboratory in Alberta, Canada.  Dr. Hodkinson is a Past President of the Alberta Society of Laboratory Physicians (ASLP), which represents pathologists in Alberta, Canada, and was a key player in the restructuring of the $250M diagnostic laboratory industry in that Province.  He has acted as a laboratory accreditation inspector, and was previously Chairman of the Examination Committee in General Pathology for the Royal College of Physicians of Canada. He is a Fellow of the College of American Pathologists and has been the Medical Director of a CLIA laboratory. Dr. Hodkinson is a co-author of publications based on MultiGEN technology. https://mutantdx.com/principals/

Christian Perronne, né le 19 mars 1955 à Angers, est un médecin et professeur des universités-praticien hospitalier français. Il est spécialisé dans les pathologies tropicales et les maladies infectieuses émergentes. Il a été président de la commission spécialisée « Maladies transmissibles » du Haut Conseil de la santé publique. Il est connu pour ses positions controversées sur la maladie de Lyme ainsi que son soutien apporté au traitement préconisé par le professeur Didier Raoult pendant la pandémie de Covid-19. Ses déclarations polémiques et réitérées, ses déclarations « indignes de la fonction qu’il exerce » et son soutien à l’association BonSens créée par Martine Wonner entraînent son exclusion de la « Fédération française contre les maladies vectorielles à tiques » puis de l’Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris à la fin de l’automne 2020. En 2021, il multiplie les contre-vérités à propos des vaccins contre la Covid-19 et de l’évolution de la pandémie.

Letters To The Editor

Sunday, February 6th, 2022 Published August 13. 2021 4:50PM Are you about to rip your hair out over this insane idiocy on masks, vaccinations, variants, election fraud, armed insurrection? I am. Why on God’s green earth would anybody listen to Dr. flip flop Fauci? Have you heard the montage of his ever-changing wisdom? Why hasn’t he been fired? And it has been said, and proven, masks are as useless as Biden. But, no! Let’s keep this idiocy going for as long as we can. And people have a damn good reason for not taking the jab. For one thing they lied. “Take this experimental drug, so we can get back to normal”. So now, it is “Oh no, there’s a variant!” So, get the booster. Then the next booster, and the next, if you want. It is not that you want, it is because you will have to. Read the open letter from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, an independent virologist, and vaccine expert, formerly of GAVI, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation:  linkedin.com/in/geertvandenbossche/. I listen to the science, and I am a Trump supporter. Also, a scientific study shows your natural immune system is more beneficial than any vaccine and can last up to 200 days.

Don Higgins Canterbury https://www.theday.com/article/20210813/OP02/210819747

Decision makers, in WHO, will be held responsible, accountable and liable for the dramatic consequence that this biological experiments on human beings could possibly entail.
‍Geert Vanden Bossche

Watch the second call to WHO https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/

https://mobile.twitter.com/GVDBossche

Twitter Suspends Main Account, Multiple Staff Accounts for Education Website That Highlights Dangers of CRT By Nathan Worcester February 4, 2022 Updated: February 6, 2022 Twitter has suspended four accounts associated with The Chalkboard Review, a website that includes a detailed guide to critical race theory (CRT) along with other resources and commentary on education. https://www.theepochtimes.com/twitter-suspends-main-account-multiple-staff-accounts-for-education-website-that-highlights-crt_4256196.html

https://thechalkboardreview.com/crt-toolkit https://twitter.com/ChalkBoardRev

Exposing Fauci’s Web of Deceit By Adriana Cohen https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/02/03/exposing_faucis_web_of_deceit_147140.html

SPARS Pandemic Scenario

This is a training exercise, based on a fictional scenario. It is a teaching and training resource for public health and government officials so that they can practice responses and better protect the public’s health. Read more. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/completed-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html

https://www.theepochtimes.com/feed

https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-jeff-zucker-turned-cnn-into-a-cult How Jeff Zucker Turned CNN Into A Cult

Top 10 owners of moderna and spotify technology sa.

Vitamin d zelenko

REVIEW https://www.thedesertreview.com/education/the-power-of-the-people—the-mandates-are-falling/article_fa57bca4-860f-11ec-aacd-b7e5a1826eae.html

READ Viscount Rothermere owner

Jonathan Harmsworth is the aristocratic owner of Britain’s gossipy tabloid, the Daily Mail. Known formally as the Viscount Rothermere, Harmsworth, controls the Daily Mail & General Trust–the corporate parent of the newspaper and DailyMail.com.
Jonathan Harmsworth – Forbes

Sharing is caringFacebookX / TwitterLinkedInWhatsAppTelegramRedditEmail3635 words · 176 views